Peer Feedback as a Future Competence
Improving Reflective Practice-based Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/ecrpl25-10922Keywords:
Reflective practice-based learning, RPL, Peer feedback, Peer acticities, Focus group interviewAbstract
Background
In clinical health education, limited time and resources for supervision often hinder students’ development of professional competencies and reflective practice. Reflective Practice-Based Learning (RPL) emphasises peer learning and feedback as potential strategies to enhance knowledge sharing and competence development. However, empirical evidence on the strengths and limitations of peer feedback in healthcare remains scarce. This study explores how students and clinical supervisors experience formal and informal peer activities and their influence on student learning.
Method
Data were collected through six semi-structured interviews involving 32 students and 13 clinical supervisors from nursing and physiotherapy programs. Thematic analysis was conducted following Braun and Clarke’s framework. Two health education students were involved throughout the research process, contributing to the development of the interview guide and the analysis.
Results
Four themes emerged: (1) Creating a safe learning environment, (2) Learning through peer activities, (3) Possibilities and limitations for peer feedback, and (4) Positions in clinical practice. Peer activities were perceived as informal and equal, fostering open dialogue, reflection, and critical thinking. Students reported enhanced academic and clinical learning, including leadership development. However, peer learning alone may risk exclusion from the broader clinical community. The findings underscore the importance of structured frameworks, clearly defined roles, and adequate preparation for effective peer feedback. Junior students benefit from experienced peers, while senior students gain from providing feedback. Limitations include uneven responsibility distribution, skill gaps, and organisational challenges.
Conclusion
Peer learning should be viewed as a complementary approach within clinical education, supported by institutional structures and supervisory engagement.
References
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press
Baillie, L. (2019). Exchanging focus groups for individual interviews when collecting qualitative data [Article]. Nurse Researcher, 27(2), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2019.e1633
Barimani, M., Zwedberg, S., & Ulfsdottir, H. (2022). Open dialogue – A grounded theory study on peer learning at birthing units. Midwifery, 111, 103355. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MIDW.2022.103355
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing Interviews (Second edition, Vol. 2) [SAGE Publications-https://doi.org/10.4135/97815297166Dau, S. (2025, February 28). refleksiv praksislæring. Den Store Danske. https://lex.dk/refleksiv_praksisl%C3%A6ring
Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut. (2021). Viden om peerfeedback på videregående uddannelser. https://www.eva.dk/udgivelser/2021/maj/viden-om-peerfeedback-paa-videregaaende-uddannelser
Dau, S., & Nielsby, U. (2021). Professionel dømmekraft og refleksiv praksislæring. I L. H. Horn, P. M. Pe-dersen, & M. Georgsen (red.), Teori og praksis i professionsdidaktik: En bog om refleksiv praksislæring. (s. 63-75). Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Davis, E., & Richardson, S. (2017). How peer facilitation can help nursing students develop their skills. British Journal of Nursing, 26(21), 11871191. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.21.1187
Dewey, J. (1938). The need of a theory of experience in Experience and Education., 25-31.
Foulkes, D., & Naylor, S. (2022). Exploring peer tutoring from the peer tutor’s perspective Radiography28(3), 793–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.02.007
Gilmour, C., McIntyre, M., McLelland, G., Hall, H., & Miles, M. (2013). Exploring the impact of clinical placement models on undergraduate midwifery students Women and Birth , 26(1), e21–e25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2012.06.004
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Henning, J. M., Weidner, T. G., & Jones, J. (2006). Peer-assisted learning in the athletic training clinical set-ting Journal of Athletic Training, 41(1), 102–108.
Holen, M., & Lehn, S. (2023). Praksischok genbesøgt: nyuddannede sygeplejerskers erfaringer med at træde ind på arbejdsmarkedet Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 25(2), 10–24.
Horn, L. H., Jensen, C.G, Kjærgaard, T., BechLukassen, N., Sørensen, I. M., Valbak-Andersen, C., & Bund-gaard, S. B. (2020). White Paper on Reflective Practice-based Learning University College of Northern Denmark.
Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet. (2024). Sundhedsstruktur kommissionens rapport-Beslutningsgrundlag for et mere lige, sammenhaengende og baeredygtigt sundhedsvaesen. Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet. www.ism.dk
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2003). Situeret læring - og andre tekster Hans Reitzels Forlag.
LeClair-Smith, C., Branum, B., Bryant, L., Cornell, B., Martinez, H., Nash, E., & Phillips, L. (2016). Peer-to-Peer Feedback: A Novel Approach to Nursing Quality, Collaboration, and Peer Review. Journal of Nursing Administration., 46(6), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.00000000000003
Licqurish, S., & Seibold, C. (2013). ‘Chasing the numbers’: Australian Bachelor of Midwifery students’ expe-riences of achieving midwifery practice requirements for registration Midwifery, 29(6), 661–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.006
Looman, N., Woezik, T., Asselt, D., Scherpbier‐de Haan, N., Fluit, C., & Graaf, J. (2022). Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning. Medical Education, 56(4), 444–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14706
McKellar, L., & Graham, K. (2017). A review of the literature to inform a best-practice clinical supervision model for midwifery students in Australia. Nurse Education in Practice, 24, 92-98.
Markowski, M., Bower, H., Essex, R., & Yearley, C. (2021). Peer learning and collaborative placement mod-els in health care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of the literature Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(11–12), 1519–1541. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15661
Nielsen, L., Munch, P., & Nielsen, A. (2019). Praksisnær forskning: dannelse af professionel identitet gennem refleksiv praksislæring. Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier, 15(29), 62–65.
Rasmussen, S. P. (2010). En undersøgelse af sygeplejestuderendes trivsel i praktikuddannelse i en hospitalsafdeling, og betydningen heraf i forhold til frafald PhD thesis, Syddansk Universitet. UC Viden. https://www.ucviden.dk/files/174591980/Susan_Ptak_Rasmussen_ph_d_afhandling_samlet.pdf.
Severinsson, E., & Sand, Å. (2010). Evaluation of the clinical supervision and professional development of student nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(6), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01146.x
Tornwall, J. (2018). Peer assessment practices in nurse education: An integrative review. In Nurse Education Today 71, pp. 266–275 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.017
Tørring, B., & Jensen, T. (2022). Udfordringer i samarbejdet omkring klinisk uddannelse i sygeplejerskeuddannelsen: En kvalitativ interviewundersøgelse Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18261/nsf.12.1.3
Wong, B. S. H., & Shorey, S. (2022). Nursing students’ experiences and perception of peer feedback: A qualitative systematic review [Article]. Nurse Education Today, 116, 105469–105469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105469
World Health Organization. (2020, April 14). State of the world’s nursing 2020: investing in education, jobs and leadership. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240003279
World Medical Association. (2001). DECLARATION OF HELSINKI: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 27(2), xiii–xv. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2001.tb01222.x
Zwedberg, S., Alnervik, M., & Barimani, M. (2021). Student midwives’ perception of peer learning during their clinical practice in an obstetric unit: A qualitative study Nurse Education Today, 99, 104785–104785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104785
Zwedberg, S., Barimani, M., & Jonas, W. (2020). Exploring the internship experiences of Swedish final term student midwives: A cross-sectional survey Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 26, 100543–100543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100543
