Reflecting for Change
How Pedagogical Diploma Assignments Become Reflective Boundary Objects for Change of Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/ecrpl25-10923Keywords:
Teacher education, Pedagogical development, Reflective practice, Boundary objects, NoticingAbstract
This study explores how pedagogical diploma assignments act as reflective boundary objects that support teachers in transforming their practice. Drawing on 212 assignments written by in-service teachers participating in a workplace-embedded diploma program in a Danish municipality, the study investigates how teachers reflect on and initiate pedagogical change by asking the following research questions:
1: Which pedagogical practices do the teachers notice and choose to investigate – and how?
2: What improvements to their own practice do they bring forward as a result of their investigations?
Anchored in Dewey’s pragmatism, Benner’s praxeological approach, and Mason’s theory of noticing, the analysis reveals that teachers frequently focused on differentiated instruction, student motivation, inclusive practices, and classroom dynamics. These investigations lead teachers to critically examine their teaching through self-initiated inquiry. The assignments not only document changes in teaching methods but also demonstrate a shift in teachers’ professional self-understanding and conceptual framing of pedagogy. Teachers often narrate their learning processes, linking personal experiences to broader educational theories, thereby bridging formal coursework with the realities of everyday classroom practice. The findings highlight the transformative potential of diploma assignments when integrated within institutional models like the University School, which supports situated, autonomous inquiry. These reflective artifacts serve as tools for noticing, principled experimentation, and ethical reflection, enabling teachers to engage deeply with their practice. The study contributes to the field of reflective teacher education by presenting a model of partnership-based profession-didactical learning that emphasizes teacher agency and boundary-crossing reflection. It suggests that structured, experience-based inquiry can lead to meaningful, context-sensitive pedagogical development when embedded in supportive professional environments.
References
Albrechtsen, T. R. S., Carlsen, D., Gammelgaard, O. & Hachmann, R. (2024). Kvalitet i partnerskaber mellem folkeskole og læreruddannelse : Universitetsskoler som eksempel. Studier I læreruddannelse Og -Profession, 9(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.7146/lup.v9i1.143364
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Re-search, 81(2), 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
Benner, D. (2015). Allgemeine Pädagogik: Eine systematisch-problemgeschichtliche Einführung in die Grundstruktur pädagogischen Denkens und Handelns (8th ed.). Beltz Juventa.
Biesta, G. (2015). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.
Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey-Bass.
Carlsen, D., Ipsen, M., & Denning, R. C. (2024). Universitetsskolen: - et bud på en bæredygtig skoleudvikling? I N. Elf, C. Svabo, & T. Skovgaard (red.), Bæredygtige skoleliv (s. 72-93). Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath.
Dewey, J. (2005/1938). Experience and Education. Dover Publications.
Duch, H. S. (2021). På grænsen mellem uddannelse og arbejdsplads – om vurdering og inklusion af eksa-mensopgaver. CEPRA-striben, (27), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.17896/UCN.cepra.n27.415
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 451–498. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_2
Hachmann, R., Albrechtsen, T.R.S., Carlsen D. & Gammelgaard, O. (2023). The University School – Bridging Teacher Education and School. In Georgsen, M., Dau, S., & Helverskov Horn, L. (Eds.) (2023). Proceed-ings for the European Conference on Reflective Practice-based Learning 2023: November 20th-22nd 2023. Aalborg Universitetsforlag (pp. 53-63). https://aauforlag.dk/produkt/proceedingsudgivelser/proceedings-for-the-european-conference-on-reflective-practice-based-learning-2023
Horn, L. H., Jensen, C. G., Kjærgaard, T., Lukassen, N. B., Sørensen, I. M., Valbak-Andersen, C., & Bund-gaard, S. B. (2020). White Paper on Reflective Practice-based Learning. Retrieved from: https://www.ucviden.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/124261992/Hvidbog_om_RPL.pdf
Illeris, K. (2009). Transfer of learning in the learning society: How can the barriers between different learning spaces be surmounted, and how can the gap between learning inside and outside schools be bridged? International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370902756986
Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203019672
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Mason, J. (2021). Learning about noticing, by, and through, noticing. ZDM Mathematics Education 53, 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01192-4
Mason, J. (2002). Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203471876
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063128901900300
