Effectiveness of Immersive VR for Reflective Learning in Architectural Technology and Construction Management Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/ecrpl25-10937

Keywords:

Reflective practice-based learning, Immersive virtual reality, Architectural Technology and Construction Management Education

Abstract

This study investigates the practice of reflective learning in construction management education by exploring the integration of immersive virtual reality (VR) technologies. Traditional educational approaches often struggle to provide students with immersive and practical experiences that replicate real-world construction scenarios. VR offers an innovative solution by enabling experiential learning in a risk-free environment, supporting the development of critical skills such as decision-making, safety management, and project execution. The research employs a Design-Based Research methodology to design and evaluate interventions that integrate VR into educational frameworks. These interventions are guided by the Reflective Practice-Based Learning (RPL) principle: “Teaching and learning activities are organized as exploration.” The study uses qualitative analysis to examine how VR can enhance students’ reflection, deepen understanding, and support knowledge transfer and skill development in building design. The findings provide insights into how VR can facilitate meaningful engagement with complex building designs and contribute to the near and far transfer in learning. The immersive VR in education demonstrates significant potential for transforming traditional educational methods. The study’s practical implications lie in providing new educational designs that combine technological tools with reflective, practice-oriented learning approaches.

References

Aarkrog, V., & Wahlgren, B. (2012). Transfer: kompetence i en professionel sammenhæng. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

Alizadehsalehi, S., Hadavi, A., & Huang, J. C. (2020). From BIM to extended reality in AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 116 (103254), 1–13.

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.

Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex inter-ventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.

Brinkmann, S. (2016). John Dewey: en introduktion Hans Reitzel.

Haahr, M. T. (2023). Multi-user virtual reality based design review of students construction designs. In C. Park, F. P. Rahimian, N. Dawood, A. Pedro, L. Dongmin, R. Hussain, & M. Soltani (Eds.), Digitalization in Con-struction: Recent trends and advances Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003408949-1

Horn, L. H., Jensen, C. G., Kjærgaard, T., Sørensen, I. M., Valbak-Andersen, C., Bundgaard, S. B., & Lukassen, N. B. (2020). Hvidbog om refleksiv praksislæring.

Laursen, M. H. (2017). Abduktiv undervisning og læring. Hans Reitzel.

Le, Q. T., Pedro, A., & Park, C. S. (2015). A social virtual reality based construction safety education system for experiential learning. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 79, 487–506.

Lucas, J. (2018). Student perceptions and initial response to using virtual reality for construction education. In T.Sulbaran. 54th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings (281-288). Associated Schools of Construction. http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2018/paper/CERT101002018.pdf

Maxcy, S. J. (2003). Pragmatic Threads in Mixed Method Research in the Social Sciences: The Search for Multiple Modes of Inquiry and the End of the Philosophy of Formalism. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in the Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 51-89). Sage.

Messner, J., Yerrapathruni, S., Baratta, A., & Whisker, V. (2003). Using virtual reality to improve construction engineering education. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Conference. 10.18260/1-2--11970

Miettinen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 54–72.

Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agen-da. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.

Saunders, C. H., Sierpe, A., von Plessen, C., Kennedy, A. M., Leviton, L. C., Bernstein, S. L., Goldwag, J., King, J. R., Marx, C. M., Pogue, J. A., Saunders, R. K., Van Citters, A., Yen, R. W., Elwyn, G., & Leyenaar, J. K. (2023). Practical thematic analysis: A guide for multidisciplinary health services research teams engaging in qualitative analysis. BMJ, 2023, 381. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-074256

Wahlgren, B. (2013). Transfer i VEU: Tolv faktorer der sikrer, at man anvender det, man lærer.

Wang, P., Wu, P., Wang, J., Chi, H., & Wang, X. (2018a). A critical review of the use of virtual reality in con-struction engineering education and training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), 1204.

Zaker, R., & Coloma, E. (2018). Virtual reality-integrated workflow in BIM-enabled projects collaboration and design review: a case study. Visualization in Engineering, 6, 1–15.

Downloads

Published

11-11-2025

How to Cite

Makarova Jørsfeldt, L., & Thorlund Haahr, M. (2025). Effectiveness of Immersive VR for Reflective Learning in Architectural Technology and Construction Management Education. Proceedings for the European Conference on Reflective Practice-Based Learning 2025, (3). https://doi.org/10.54337/ecrpl25-10937