Examining the Technology Experience Profile of Individuals with Disabilities from Sexual and Gender Diversity in Quebec, Canada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/aau.icdvrat26.44Abstract
This study examined technology use among 30 people with disabilities identifying as LGBTQIA+ in Quebec, Canada. The sample demonstrated substantial diversity in gender identity, sexual orientation, and disability status. Participants showed moderate to high technology experience, with mean scores indicating competency to expert levels. Frequent use was reported for mobile phones, computers, email, and social media. Conversely, health-related technologies, such as blood pressure monitors, health management software, and medication reminder devices, were used less often. Findings suggest that people with disabilities identifying as LGBTQIA+ may prioritize technologies that support communication, connection, and socialization over those focused solely on health management.
References
Barbareschi, G, Aranda Jan, J, Nique, M, Ramos Barajas, F, and Holloway, C, (2019). Mobile Phones as Assistive Technologies: Gaps and Opportunities. https://at2030.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2019/08/Mobile-Phonesas-Assistive-Technologies-Gaps-and-Opportunities.pdf. 2023-04-14.
Barg-Walkow, LJ, Mitzner, TJ, and Rogers, WA, The Technology Experience Profile (TEP): Assessment and Scoring Guide (HFA-TR-1402). Atlanta, GA, USA: Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology, Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, 2014.
Berger, MN, Taba, M, Marino, JL, Lim, MSC, Cooper, SC, Lewis, L, Albury, K, Chung, KSK, Bateson, D, and Skinner, SR, (2021). Social media’s role in support networks among LGBTQ adolescents : A qualitative study. Sexual Health, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 421-431, doi : 10.1071/SH21110.
Crawford, KA, and Hamidi, F, (2025). « Like a love language » : Understanding communication in disabled LGBTQIA+ romantic relationships. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1-17. doi : 10.1145/3706598.3713195.
Crawford, KA, Spiel, K, and Hamidi, F, (2023). Complex dynamics : Disability, assistive technology, and the LGBTQIA+ community center experience in the United States. The 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 1-15. doi : 10.1145/3597638.3608401.
Drysdale, K, Gendera, S, Londos, C, White, G, and Fisher, KR, (2026). Radical accessibility : Co-designing for intersectionality in a peer-led LGBTIQA+ disability digital storytelling project. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1-16. doi : 10.1080/09638288.2026.2643547.
Hongyang, H, (2020), Interaction design of new technology for older adults from the ease of learning perspective, Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, USA. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2400554701?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
Cronbach, LJ, (1951), Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, vol. 16, pp. 297–334.
Harris, MT, and Rogers, WA, (2023) Developing a healthcare technology acceptance model (H-TAM) for older adults with hypertension, Ageing and Society, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 814–834, doi: 10.1017/s0144686x21001069.
Kiselica, AM, Lin, SSH, Ranum, R, Mikula, CM., Hermann, G, Boone, A, Scullin, M, Mechanic-Hamilton, D, Wolf, T, Stevens, A, and Benge, JF, (2024), The Technology in Caring Questionnaire: Development and psychometric properties, Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 77–84, doi: 10.1097/wad.0000000000000604.
Patel, D, Osipova, E, Spiel, K, and Barbareschi, G, (2025), A critical review of sexuality, technology and disability. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1-20, doi : 10.1145/3706598.3713994.
Scherer, MJ, (2005), Living in the state of stuck: How assistive technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities (4th edition ed.). Brookline Books.
