Developing and Piloting a Q-study on Pedagogical Challenges in Problem- and Project-based Learning for First-year Engineering Students

Niels Erik Ruan Lyngdorf; Bettina Dahl; Dan Jiang

doi:10.54337/irspbl-11021

Authors

Niels Erik Ruan Lyngdorf Aalborg University
Bettina Dahl Aalborg University
Dan Jiang Aalborg University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11021

Keywords:

Problem based learning, Q-study, First-year engineering students, Pedagogical challenges

Abstract

Research highlights the benefits of Problem- and Project-Based Learning (PBL) for engineering education, but students face challenges with some of its pedagogical features. This pilot study uses Q-methodology to explore first-year engineering (FYE) students’ learning challenges in a PBL environment. Based on literature, feedback from PBL experts, the University Student Counselling and Well-being unit, and students, 39 Q- statements was developed regarding different pedagogical challenges of students in PBL. Rather than simply identifying challenges, this study aims to identify the most predominant ones. Q-methodology is appropriate because participants rank statements in relation to each other, instead of rating individual statements. Our Q sorting question therefore asks FYE students to rank pedagogical features of PBL from most to least significant in terms of perceived challenge in relation to learning. To pilot the Q, we consulted two experts in PBL and Q-methodology and subsequently let 5 FYE students do the sorting activity. The results of this pilot are informative in themselves in further developing the tool. In the long term, this study is anticipated to provide knowledge about how students struggle with PBL which will help universities become aware of and remedy the situation.

References

Askehave, I., Prehn, H. L., Pedersen, J., & Pedersen, M. T. (Eds.) (2015). PBL: Problem-Based Learning. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on psychological science, 1(2), 164–180.

Bandura, A. (2008). Toward an agentic theory of the self. Advances in self research, 3, 15–49.

Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society, 2(59–68).

Brinkworth, R., McCann, B., Matthews, C., & Nordström, K. (2009). First year expectations and experiences: Student and teacher perspectives. Higher Education, 58, 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008- 9188-3

Bundgaard, S. B., Dahl, B., Krogh, L., & Ravn, O. (2021). Exploring PBL Group Formation Processes. Aalborg University Press. Research in Higher Education Practices No. 7.

Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2021). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: A review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 90–115.

Du, X., Graaff, E. de., & Kolmos, A. (Eds.) (2009). Research on PBL Practice in Engineering Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Hagan, D., & Macdonald, I. (2000). A collaborative project to improve teaching and learning in first year programming. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 9(1), 65–76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2663565

Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education–theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher education, 51, 287–314.

Jiang, D., Dahl, B., Chen, J., & Du, X. (2023). Engineering students’ perception of learner agency development in an intercultural PBL (Problem-and Project-Based) team setting. IEEE Transactions on Education, 66(6), 591–601.

Jiang, D., Dahl, B., & Du, X. (2023). A systematic review of engineering students in intercultural teamwork: Characteristics, challenges, and coping strategies. Education Sciences, 13(6), 540.

Knowles, M. S. (1978). Andragogy: Adult learning theory in perspective. Community College Review, 5(3), 9– 20.

Kolmos, A. (2017). PBL curriculum strategies: From course based PBL to a systemic PBL approach. In PBL in engineering education (pp. 1–12). Brill.

Lundberg, A., de Leeuw, R., & Aliani, R. (2020). Using Q methodology: Sorting out subjectivity in educational research. Educational research review, 31, 100361.

Lyngdorf, N. E. R., Du, X., & Lundberg, A. (2023). First-year engineering students’ learner agency sources in a systemic PBL environment: a Q study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(6), 1130–1147.

O’Brien, E., & Reale, J. (2021). Supporting learner agency using the pedagogy of choice. In S. Hase & L. M. Blaschke (Eds.), Unleashing the power of learner agency. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/up

Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 9(2), 5–15.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: the development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). The subjective experience of partnership love: AQ methodological study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(1), 85–107.

Watts S, Stenner P. 2012. Doing Q methodological research: theory, method & interpretation. Sage, London.