Designing Successful and Sustainable Interdisciplinary PBL in Engineering Education: A Cross-case Analysis of System Projects in Practice

Lykke Brogaard Bertel; Pernille Scholdan Bertelsen; Pia Rosenquist Kruse; Ove Kjeld Andersen; Nicolai Brodersen Hansen; Markus Löchtefeld; Jens Frederik Dalsgaard Nielsen; Ulrik Nyman; Maj-Britt Quitzau; Mateus Halbe Torres; Maiken Winther; Louise Møller Haase

doi:10.54337/irspbl-11042

Authors

Lykke Brogaard Bertel Aalborg University
Pernille Scholdan Bertelsen Aalborg University
Pia Rosenquist Kruse Aalborg University
Ove Kjeld Andersen Aalborg University
Nicolai Brodersen Hansen Aalborg University
Markus Löchtefeld Aalborg University
Jens Frederik Dalsgaard Nielsen Aalborg University
Ulrik Nyman Aalborg University
Maj-Britt Quitzau Aalborg University
Mateus Halbe Torres Aalborg University
Maiken Winther Aalborg University
Louise Møller Haase Aalborg University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11042

Keywords:

System projects, Interdisciplinarity, Engineering education, Problem-based learning, Curriculum design

Abstract

Interdisciplinary collaboration is considered a key competence for engineers and necessary to solve society’s wicked problems in environmentally and socially sustainable ways. However, designing and developing successful and sustainable interdisciplinary PBL-projects that provide students with opportunities to engage in interdisciplinary learning, is no easy task. It requires cross-cutting collaboration, not only between students themselves but also between supervisors and facilitators, study management and administration. This paper provides indicative and explorative insights into potentials and challenges related to designing interdisciplinary PBL, exemplified through an empirical cross-case analysis of the “System Projects” initiative at the Technical Faculty of IT and Design at Aalborg University. Through in-depth interviews with project coordinators, we identify eight dimensions of system project integration and develop a curricular model for mapping variation within system projects: the System Project curricular spiderweb. We discuss key drivers for success and typical challenges, finding that successful interdisciplinary PBL can be achieved when the definition of the type of project is not too rigid, when we provide space for prototyping, experimentation and co-creation between staff, students and stakeholders, and when the objectives are perceived by all involved as engaging and important with purpose extending beyond just academic goals.

References

Aalborg University, Department of Computer Science. (n.d.). About Giraf. Link: https://giraf.cs.aau.dk/en/about-giraf/

AAU Space (n.d.). AAU Student Space – 20+ years of Cubesats. Link: https://www.en.space.aau.dk/education

AAU Space Robotics Team (n.d.). AAU Space Robotics Team. Link: https://dk.linkedin.com/company/aau-space-robotics

Beldad, A. D., & Miedema, H. A. T. (2025). Introducing a framework for designing an interdisciplinary engineering curriculum: educating new engineers for complex sociotechnical challenges. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1-18.

Bertel, L. B., Lavi, R., Rathcke, K., Coelho, N. F., Dyremose, S. C. S. (2025). Towards a framework for assessing systems thinking in collaborative problem-solving in STEM. In ASEE 2025 Annual Conference: Engineering Educators Bringing the World Together. (In press). American Society for Engineering Education.

Bertel, L. B., Winther, M., Routhe, H. W., & Kolmos, A. (2022). Framing and facilitating complex problem- solving competences in interdisciplinary megaprojects: An institutional strategy to educate for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(5), 1173-1191.

Bertel, L., Askehave, I., Brohus, H., Geil, O., Kolmos, A., Ovesen, N., & Stoustrup, J. (2021). Digital transformation at Aalborg University: Interdisciplinary problem- and project-based learning in a post-digital age. Advances in Engineering Education, 9(3).

Christiansen, S. H., Chen, J., & Du, X. (2023). Cross-institutional collaboration in engineering education – a systematic review study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(6), 1102-1129.

d'Escoffier, L. N., Guerra, A., & Braga, M. (2024). Problem-Based Learning and Engineering Education for Sustainability: Where we are and where could we go? Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 18-45.

Doulougeri, K., Vermunt, J. D., Bombaerts, G., & Bots, M. (2024). Challenge-based learning implementation in engineering education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(4), 1076- 1106.

Guerra, A., & Rodriguez-Mesa, F. (2021). Educating engineers 2030–PBL, social progress and sustainability. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 1-3.

Guerra, A., Jiang, D., & Du, X. (2022). Student agency for sustainability in a systemic PBL environment. Sustainability, 14(21), 13728.

Habbal, F., Kolmos, A., Hadgraft, R. G., Holgaard, J. E., & Reda, K. (2024). Reshaping engineering education: Addressing complex human challenges. Springer Nature.

Holgaard, J. E., Bylov, S. M., & Kolmos, A. (2020). Company projects: A guide to targeted and systematic company collaborations in the engineering programmes. Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

Institute of Advanced Studies in PBL (IASPBL). (n.d.). Sustainable development lab. Link

Kolmos, A., Holgaard, J. E., & Routhe, H. W. (2025). Understanding and Designing Variation in Interdisciplinary Problem-Based Projects in Engineering Education. Education Sciences, 15(2), 138.

Kolmos, A., Holgaard, J. E., Routhe, H. W., Winther, M., & Bertel, L. (2024). Interdisciplinary project types in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 49(2), 257-282.

Lantada, A. D. (2020). Engineering education 5.0: Continuously evolving engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(6), 1814-1832.

Lavi, R., Breslow, L. O. R. I., Salek, M. M., & Crawley, E. F. (2023). Fostering and assessing the systems thinking of first-year engineering students using the system architecture-function-purpose framework. International Journal of Engineering Education, 39, 176-188.

Routhe, H. W., Holgaard, J. E., & Kolmos, A. (2024). Leadership in interdisciplinary engineering students’ projects: A faculty perspective for supporting the development of student leadership. International Journal of Engineering Education, 40(4), 1-19.

Routhe, H. W., Bertel, L. B., Winther, M., Kolmos, A., Münzberger, P., & Andersen, J. (2021). Interdisciplinary megaprojects in blended problem-based learning environments: Student perspectives. In Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative and Blended Learning (ICBL2020) (pp. 169-180). Springer International Publishing.

UNESCO. (2021). Engineering for sustainable development: Delivering on the sustainable development goals. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://en.unesco.org/reports/engineering

Royal Academy of Engineering (April 2025). Engineers 2030: Visions and Principles. National Engineering Policy Centre. nepc-engineers-2030-vision-and-principles-report.pdf

Strachan, S. M., Marshall, S., Murray, P., Coyle, E. J., & Sonnenberg-Klein, J. (2019). Using Vertically Integrated Projects to embed research-based education for sustainable development in undergraduate curricula. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(8), 1313-1328.

Van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. Van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Van den Akker, J. (2013). Curricular development research as a specimen of educational design research - Part A: An introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52–71). Enschede: SLO.