Experiences of the transition from a Traditional to an Integrative Project-based Curriculum

Authors

  • John Mitchell UCL Centre for Engineering Education
  • Emanuela Tilley UCL Centre for Engineering Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11056

Keywords:

Curriculum development, Staff experience, Project-based learning

Abstract

In 2012, the UCL Faculty of Engineering Sciences made a major revision of its undergraduate curricula, through the implementation of the Integrated Engineering Programme (IEP). The academic year, 2023/2024, saw the IEP celebrate 10 years of new student intake into the reformed degree programmes which aimed to enhance the skills and societal awareness of graduates through a series of project-based learning experiences, integrated with a curriculum of instruction. Over these 10 years, it has evolved - through conscious action to improve but sometimes through unintended consequences of institutional initiatives or local developments. This paper documents the reflections of two leading members of the development team and shares experiences of implementing and maintaining a major curriculum reform focused on a student- centred, active and experiential approach to learning and teaching in a large, research-intensive university. It leverages a survey of alumni to highlight achievements, challenges and perceptions of this approach as seen by both staff and students. It considers the relationship between pedagogical ideologies and the practicalities of change within existing structures and the challenges of legacy within the institution. It aims to provide insight and support to those leading and managing programme-wide curriculum change. 

References

de Andrade, M. O., M. Zurita, I. Burova, A. Nyamapfene. “Assessing higher levels of learning through real-life problems in engineering mathematics”. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (2022). 2002-2006

Bruner, J.S. (1960) “The Process of Education” (Cambridge M A,Harvard University Press).

Crawley, E. F., J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, D. R. Brodeur, K. Edström. "The CDIO approach." Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach (2014): 11-45.

Drake, S. and R. Burns. “Meeting standards through integrated curriculum”. ASCD, 2004.

Froyd, J. E., and M. W. Ohland. "Integrated engineering curricula." Journal of Engineering Education 94, no. 1 (2005): 147-164.

Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education. In Proceedings of the IEEE, 100, Special Centennial Issue, 1344-1360. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2190167.

Fung, D. “Connected Curriculum for Higher Education.” UCL Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1qnw8nf

Goldberg D.E., M. Somerville. “A Whole New Engineer: The Coming Revolution in Engineering Education.” Threejoy Associates, Incorporated. 2014

Goodlad, J. I. “Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice”. McGraw-Hill Inc., US 1979

Graham, R. “Achieving excellence in engineering education: the ingredients of successful change.” Royal Academy of Engineering (2012).

Graham, R. "The global state of the art in engineering education." Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Report, Massachusetts, USA (2018).

Graham, R. “Collaborative Engineering Education in the Digital Age: Institution: UCL” https://www.ceeda.org/case-studies/ceeda-institution/ucl-uk 2021

Habbal, F., A. Kolmos, R.G. Hadgraft, J. Egelund Holgaard, K. Reda. “Reshaping Engineering Education: Addressing Complex Human Challenges”, Springer, 2024

Hailes, S., E. Jones, M. Micheletti, J. E. Mitchell, A. Nyamapfene, K. Roach, E. Tilley, and F. Truscott. "The UCL Integrated Engineering Programme." Advances in Engineering Education (2021).

Harden R.M. and Stamper N. “What is a spiral curriculum?”, Medical Teacher, 21:2, (1999) 141-143

Kolmos, A. “PBL Curriculum Strategies.” In PBL in Engineering Education – International Perspectives on Curriculum Change, edited by A. Guerra, R. Ulseth, and A. Kolmos, 1–12. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2017.

Lindsay, E. D., and J. R. Morgan. "The CSU engineering model: educating student engineers through PBL, WPL and an online, on demand curriculum." European Journal of Engineering Education 46, no. 5 (2021): 637-661.

Mitchell, J.E., A. Nyamapfene, K. Roach and E. Tilley. “Faculty wide curriculum reform: the integrated engineering programme”, European Journal of Engineering Education, 46:1 (2021) 48-66

Mitchell, J., & Tilley, E. (2024). “The Role of Project Based Learning at the Core of Curriculum Development.” Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 1–17.

Roach, K., E. Tilley, and J. Mitchell. “How authentic does authentic learning have to be?”. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3:1 (2018), 495-509.

Savin-Baden, M., and C.H. Major. “Foundations of Problem-Based Learning” (p. 198). New York: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. 2004

Seymour, E. Tracking the processes of change in US undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Science Education, 86, (2002) 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1044

SLO – Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (2009). Curriculum in development. Enschede, the Netherlands.

van den Akker, J., Kuiper, W., Hameyer, U., Terwel, J., Volman, M., & Wardekker, W. “Substantive trends in curriculum design and implementation: An analysis of innovations in the Netherlands”. Curriculum landscapes and trends, (2003) 137-156.

Downloads

Published

14-11-2025

How to Cite

Mitchell, J., & Tilley, E. (2025). Experiences of the transition from a Traditional to an Integrative Project-based Curriculum . Proceedings from the International Research Symposium on Problem-Based Learning (IRSPBL). https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11056

Issue

Section

Theme 2: Institutional Implementation and Research Perspectives in STEM Education