Scalable VR Solutions for Engineering Education
A Continuous Improvement Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11059Keywords:
Virtual reality (VR), Engineering education, Industry 4.0, Emotional response, Virtual learning environments, Continuous improvement, Curriculum developmentAbstract
The increasing use of technology in higher education, especially in resource-constrained environments, is reshaping how students engage with industrial experiences. Virtual Reality (VR) offers a solution to the challenges posed by growing class sizes and limited real-world access, supporting holistic Graduate Attribute Development and addressing global SDG challenges in engineering education.
This paper explores how VR can enhance student engagement with complex technological topics like Industry 4.0. It examines the effectiveness of a VR-based framework for improving student emotional responses and interest in technology, while assessing the scalability of such approaches for larger classes.
A pilot study was conducted with third- and fourth-year students participating in a voluntary virtual facility layout activity. Emotional response surveys showed that fourth-year students were more comfortable with the technology, as expected, but both groups reported increased interest in technological topics. The study uses a dynamic response evaluation model informed by these surveys, and the organizational distinction between development teams and lecturing staff enables the framework to scale effectively.
The findings demonstrate that VR can improve student engagement and comfort with emerging technologies, making it an important tool for resource-constrained environments. This framework provides a method for continuous improvement, quantifying the long-term impact of VR on engineering education curricula. By enabling adaptable, scalable learning experiences, it helps prepare students for complex engineering challenges and future technological changes, offering a valuable contribution to the ongoing evolution of engineering education.
References
Alizadeh, M., & Cowie, N. (2022). Self-directed learning using VR. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(1), 10-11. doi:10.24135/pjtel.v4i1.130
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Barnett, R. (2000). Supercomplexity and the curriculum. Studies in higher education, 25(3), 255-265.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of. Educational Objectives.
Cao, L. (2023). A meta-analysis of the impact of AR and VR technologies on mathematics learning. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 23, 637-649. doi:10.54097/ehss.v23i.13133
Chandramouli, M., & Williams, A. (2024). Affordable virtual and augmented reality training modules for workforce development and smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 19(4), 101-107.
Chen, J., Fu, Z., Liu, H., & Wang, J. (2024). Effectiveness of Virtual Reality on Learning Engagement: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 19(1), 1-14. doi:10.4018/IJWLTT.334849
Dorfling, C., Wolff, K., & Akdogan, G. , Expanding the semantic range to enable meaningful real-world application in chemical engineering, South African Journal of Higher Education, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 42-58, 2019.
Geris, A. (2024). The EVRIM Framework: Guiding Ethical and Inclusive Virtual Reality Integration in Education. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 567-583.
Gilmore, J., Wolff, K., & Bladergroen, M. (2017, June). The night before the test: Electrical engineering students use of online resources to prepare for assessment. In Proceedings of the Biennial Conference of the South African Society for Engineering Education (p. 82).
Gilmore, R. O., Adolph, K. E., Millman, D. S., & Gordon, A. (2016). Transforming education research through open video data sharing. Advances in engineering education, 5(2), http-advances.
Graeske, C., & Sjöberg, S. A. (2021). VR-Technology in Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges. International Education Studies, 14(8), 76. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n8p76
H. Ardiny and E. Khanmirza, "The Role of AR and VR Technologies in Education Developments: Opportunities and Challenges," 2018 6th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (IcRoM), Tehran, Iran, 2018, pp. 482-487, doi: 10.1109/ICRoM.2018.8657615.
IEA, Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies, International Engineering Alliance, 2021.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. New Jersey, Eaglewood Cliffs, 5, 1-12.
Kruger, K., Wolff, K., & Cairncross, K. (2022). Real, virtual, or simulated: Approaches to emergency remote learning in engineering. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(1), 93-105.
Leng, J., Sha, W., Wang, B., Zheng, P., Zhuang, C., Liu, Q., ... & Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 65, 279-295.
Lewis, C., Wolff, K., & Bekker, B. (2025). Making the implicit explicit: operationalising occurrences of cognitive development in a postgraduate engineering Community of Practice. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1-16.
N. a. o. engineering, NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges/discovery.aspx.
Sadek, O., Baldwin, F., Gray, R., Khayyat, N., & Fotis, T. (2023). Impact of virtual and augmented reality on quality of medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 15(3), 328-338. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-22-00594.1
Steed, C. A., Wolff, K., & Mangaroo-Pillay, M. (2025). A Framework for Virtual Reality Adoption in Engineering Education: Measuring Emotional Engagement and Long-term Effects. 15th Conference on Learning Factories 2025. Conference on Learning Factories.
Tait, A. (2000). Planning student support for open and distance learning. Open learning: The Journal of open, distance and e-learning, 15(3), 287-299.
Tootell, A., Jackson, M., Jiminez, Y., & Rainford, L. (2024). Advancing radiography education: Bridging theory and practice. Radiography, 30, 156-157.
United Nations. (2025). The 17 goals. United Nations. [Online]. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
Van Dyk, M., Mangaroo-Pillay, M., & Steed, C. A. (2025). Scaling Industrial Robotics Education: A Serious Game Approach for Resource-Limited Regions. 15th Conference on Learning Factories 2025. Conference on Learning Factories.
Walker, R. (2022). Using virtual reality to support first-year online initial teacher education students. ASCILITE Publications, e22113-e22113. doi:10.14742/apubs.2022.113
Yu, Z., & Xu, W. (2022). A meta analysis and systematic review of the effect of virtual reality technology on users' learning outcomes. Computer applications in engineering education, 30(5), 1470-1484. doi:10.1002/cae.22532
Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non‐clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(3), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144665031752934
Di Pompeo, I., D’Aurizio, G., Burattini, C., Bisegna, F., & Curcio, G. (2023). Positive mood induction to promote well-being and health: A systematic review from real settings to virtual reality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 91, 102095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102095
Pallavicini, F., & Pepe, A. (2020). Virtual Reality Games and the Role of Body Involvement in Enhancing Positive Emotions and Decreasing Anxiety: Within-Subjects Pilot Study. JMIR Serious Games, 8(2), e15635. https://doi.org/10.2196/15635
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
