Same but not The Same
Describing and Shaping Meaning-making in Engineering Mathematics Problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11062Keywords:
Engineering mathematics, Applications, Abstraction, Real world problems, SemanticsAbstract
Existing paradigms for mathematics education emphasise self-regulated learning, modelling competencies, and learning outcomes in all cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains of learning. However, there is a gap in the engineering education literature with regards to meaning making of mathematics concepts as applied to engineering problems. This paper is written as a configurative dialogue between two educators delivering and supporting teaching and learning of mathematics in two different European contexts and one supporting learning in a South African context. In sharing our practices, we realised that although an exhaustive list of frameworks for mathematics education exists, telling them apart in the context of engineering mathematics education can be difficult and often adds little actionable insights. This realisation motivates the title of this paper “Same but not The Same”. We use the semantic plane of Legitimation Code Theory (LCT) to reflect on problem or scenario-based learning of abstract and/or complex mathematics topics such as linear algebra and differential equations through examples of their (engineering) applications. We argue that qualitative descriptions of meaning-making in open-ended, real-life mathematics problems, methods, and tasks are scarce, and that this can create significant challenges for educators to describe, share, and shape their practices.
References
A. Nyamapfene, S. Lynch, I. Burova and M. O. D. Andrade, "MATLAB and Python Open Book Assessments: Lessons from Two UK Institutions," 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Tunis, Tunisia, 2022, pp. 2022-2027, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766577.
Askehave, I., Prehn, H. L., Pedersen, J., & Pedersen, M. T. (Eds.) 2015. PBL: Problem-Based Learning. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
Basil Bernstein (1999) Vertical and Horizontal Discourse: An essay, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20:2, 157-173, DOI: 10.1080/01425699995380
Blackie, M. A. (2014). Creating semantic waves: Using Legitimation Code Theory as a tool to aid the teaching of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 462-469.
CHE. (2022). VitalStats Public Higher Education. Council on Higher Education, Pretoria. South Africa.
Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2020). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: a review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615
Christensen, O. R. (2008). Closing the gap between formalism and application: PBL and mathematical skills in engineering. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 27(3), 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrn012
Dahl, B. (2018). What is the problem in problem-based learning in higher education mathematics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(1), 112-125.
Dahl, B., Hüttel, H., Rasmussen, J. G., & Rasmussen, M. G. (2023). Contextualisation in university level problem-based learning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 43(3), 27-31. https://flm- journal.org/index.php?do=show&lang=en&showMenu=43%2C3
de Andrade, M. O., & Makramalla, M. (2023). A Critical Approach To Engineering Mathematics Activities For Sustainable Development. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). DOI: 10.21427/C7CY-2P36
de Andrade, M., Reynolds, R., Clayton, A., Van Maele, J., (2025). " Revealing and Addressing Semantic Discontinuities in Engineering Mathematics Education: Early Explorations with the Legitimation Code Theory" 2025 6th International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE), Setubal, Portugal, 2025 (In Press).
De Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A., (Eds.) 2007. Management of Change: Implementation of Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering. Rotterdam: Sense.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.
Frankenstein, M. (1990). Incorporating Race, Gender, and Class Issues into a Critical Mathematica Literacy Curriculum. The Journal of Negro Education, 59(3), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295568
Graham, R. (2022). CEEDA case study report: Six case studies of the impact of COVID-19 on global practice in engineering education. https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/146089
Guerra, A., & Rodriguez-Mesa, F. (2021). Educating engineers 2030 – PBL, social progress and sustainability. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1828678
Kolmos, A., Fink, F. K., & Krogh, L. (2004). The Aalborg Model: Problem-Based and Project-Organised Learning. In The Aalborg PBL model: Progress, Diversity and Challenges, edited by A. Kolmos, F. K. Fink and L. Krogh, 9-18. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
Marshall J., Plumb R.A., Atmosphere, Ocean and Climate Dynamics, AP 2007, Chapter 2, The global energy balance.
Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. Routledge, London.
Mitchell, J. E., Nyamapfene, A., Roach, K., & Tilley, E. (2019). Faculty wide curriculum reform: the integrated engineering programme. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1593324
Nxasana, S., (20 March 2025). Personal communication on National Mathematics school statistics conducted by Future Nation Schools. South Africa.
Remillard, J.T., Heck, D.J. Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education 46, 705–718 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4
Roach, K., Tilley, E., & Mitchell, J. (2018). How authentic does authentic learning have to be? Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1462099
Sierpinska, A., Lerman, S. (1996). Epistemologies of Mathematics and of Mathematics Education. In: Bishop, A.J., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Laborde, C. (eds) International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94- 009-1465-0_23
Skovsmose, O. (2023). Critical Mathematics Education. In Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26242-5
Simonsen, M. R., Lehmann, L. V., Bregnballe, E., Mouridsen, N. H., & Jakobsson, G. A. (2018). Operation Vildmark. AAU Second Semester Project, Mathematics (97 pp.). Aalborg University.
Skovsmose, O. (2001). Landscapes of Investigation. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik 33, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652747
Wolff, K., Blaine, D., & Lewis, C. (2021, November). A cumulative learning approach to developing scholarship of teaching and learning in an engineering community of practice. In 2021 World Engineering Education Forum/Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF/GEDC) (pp. 310-318). IEEE.
Wolff, K., Kruger, K., Pott, R., & de Koker, N. (2022). The conceptual nuances of technology-supported learning in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(5), 802–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2115876
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
