Building Towards Better Learning
Evolution of Practical Design, Build and Test Activities in an Introductory Mechanical Engineering Design Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11081Keywords:
Mechanical design, Prototyping, Project-based learning, ConstructionismAbstract
We describe the iteration of a practical design and prototype testing activity in our 2nd year Mechanical Design course. The initial implementation was a low complexity, low risk design task where only FDM 3D printing was used for manufacturing a static structural part. Subsequent implementations involved more complex design tasks, where prototypes required moving machine elements, and the manufacturing “toolkit” expanded to include LASER cutting and carpentry tools. We discuss challenges encountered, either due to logistical difficulties or poor estimation of student preparedness for workshop tasks. Our students have embraced the experience and we intend to retain this activity, noting some logistical and scheduling improvements that will facilitate future iterations.
References
De Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristics of Problem-Based Learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657–662. http://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol19-5/IJEE1450.pdf
Denayer, I., Thaels, K., Vander Sloten, J., & Gobin, R. (2003). Teaching a structured approach to the design process for undergraduate engineering students by problem-based education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0304379031000079031
Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism (I. Harel & S. Papert, Eds.). Ablex Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.