Open-ended Modelling Problems

Jessica Swenson

doi:10.54337/irspbl-11083

Authors

Jessica Swenson University at Buffalo, New York

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11083

Keywords:

Engineering judgment, Complex problems, Problem solving

Abstract

This Practice Paper conversation describes the intentions, learning objectives, guidelines for problem design, and best practices for implementing Open-ended Modelling problems (OEMPs). OEMPs are ill-defined mathematical modelling problems assigned in the technical core engineering courses with the goal of engaging students in the practice of engineering judgment. This collaborative project, started in 2018, includes engineering education researchers studying student learning and practices and instructors iterating on problem design and implementation. While a significant amount of our project work focuses on students’ learning and thinking, this paper is designed for engineering faculty interested in implementing similar problems within their classes.

References

ABET. (2023). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2024—2025 (pp. 1–54). ABET. https://www.abet.org/2024-2025_eac_criteria/

Belenky, M. F., McVicker Clinchy, B., Rule Goldberger, N., & Mattuck Tarule, J. (1986). Women’s Ways of Knowing. Basic Books.

Bransford, J. (Ed.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed., 9. print). National Academy Press.

Churakos, K., Markham, E., Swenson, J., & Nightingale, A. (2024). Understanding the Effect of Scaffolding on Introductory Ill-defined Problems in Engineering Education. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference.

Churakos, K., Maykish, L., Swenson, J., & Markham, E. (In Preparation). A Semester-Long Open-Ended Modeling Problem to Improve Attainment of ABET Student Outcomes in a Sophomore Statics Course. Davis, M. (2012). A Plea for Judgment. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 789–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9254-6

Edmondson, V., & Sherratt, F. (2022). Engineering judgement in undergraduate structural design education: Enhancing learning with failure case studies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(4), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2036704

Gainsburg, J. (2007). The Mathematical Disposition of Structural Engineers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 477–506.

Gainsburg, J. (2013). Learning to Model in Engineering. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(4), 259-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2013.830947

Hutchison, P., & Hammer, D. (2010). Attending to student epistemological framing in a science classroom. Science Education, 94(3), 506–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20373

Johnson, A., & Swenson, J. (2019). Open-Ended Modeling Problems in a Sophomore-Level Aerospace Mechanics of Materials Courses. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 33146. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33146

Jonassen, D. (2014). Engineers as Problem Solvers. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 103–118). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.009

Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2006.tb00885.x

Koretsky, M. D., Gilbuena, D. M., Nolen, S. B., Tierney, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Productively engaging student teams in engineering: The interplay between doing and thinking. 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044434

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.

Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Marr, W. A. (2006). Geotechnical Engineering and Judgment in the Information Age. GeoCongress 2006, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/40803(187)4

Maykish, L., Swenson, J., Lee, E., & Treadway, E. (2024). WIP: “We Just Did That”: Building Engineering Identity and Sense of Belonging Through Team Accomplishment in First-Year Design Projects. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference.

Miel K., & Swenson, J. (In Review). Engineering Faculty as Instructional Designers: Designing Open-Ended Problems to Cultivate Engineering Reasoning and Emotional Resilience.

Merrett, C., Adams, J., Johnson, A. W., & Swenson, J. (2023). Collaborating with Aviation Museums to Enhance Authentic Assessments for Aerospace Structures. Proceedings of American Society of Engineering Education.

Peck, R. (1991). Engineering Judgment. Leaders of Geotechnical Engineering, Vancouver, B.C. https://peck.geoengineer.org/index.php/resources/videos/singleVideo/41

Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The Psychology of the Child. Basic Books.

Swenson, J. (2018). Developing Knowledge in Engineering Science Courses: Sense-making and epistemologies in undergraduate mechanical engineering homework sessions.

Swenson, J., Johnson, A., Chambers, T., & Hirshfield, L. (2019). Exhibiting Productive Beginnings of Engineering Judgment during Open-Ended Modeling Problems in an Introductory Mechanics of Materials Course. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 32786. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-- 32786

Swenson, J., Johnson, A., Magee, M., & Caserto, M. (2022). Investigating the Transferability of the Productive Beginnings of Engineering Judgment Framework from Statics to Dynamics.

Swenson, J., Johnson, A., Rola, M., & Suzuki, S. (2020). Assessing and Justifying the Reasonableness of Answers to Open-Ended Problems. 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274044

Swenson, J., Johnson, A. W., Miel, K., Magee, M., Caserto, M., Perry, J. B., Kimberlin, C., Beranger, K., & Toftegaard, J. (2025). A Taxonomy of Emerging Engineering Modeling Judgment in Undergraduate Engineering Courses. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.70011

Swenson, J., Rola, M., Johnson, A., Treadway, E., Nitingale, A., Koushyar, H., Lee, J. W., & Wingate, K. (2021). Consideration for Scaffolding Open-ended Engineering Problems: Instructor Reflections after Three Years. 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637392

Swenson, J., Treadway, E., & Beranger, K. (2024). Engineering students’ epistemic affect and meta-affect in solving ill-defined problems. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(2), 280–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20579

Swenson, J., Treadway, E., Beranger, K., & Johnson, A. (2021). ‘Let Me See What I Could Do’: Students’ Epistemic Affect When Solving Open-ended, Real-world Problems. Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–8.

Swenson, J., Treadway, E., Lape, S., & Casson, A. (2023). Open-ended Modeling Problems and Engineering Identity. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 43795. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-- 43795

Treadway, E., Swenson, J. E. S., & Johnson, A. W. (2021). Open-Ended Modeling Group Projects in Introductory Statics and Dynamics Courses. American Society for Engineering Education, 1–11.

Vick, S. G. (2002). Degrees of belief: Subjective probability and engineering judgment. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers Press.

Vitali, R., Treadway, E., Johnson, A., Swenson, J., Nightingale, A., Ramo, N., & Bell, M. (2022). Work-In- Progress: Incorporating Open-Ended Modeling Problems into Undergraduate Introductory Dynamics Courses. 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 41404. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-- 41404

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Min in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.