Work-based Learning
Integrating Academia, Industry, and Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11088Keywords:
Work-based learning, Industry partnerships, Community engagementAbstract
This research paper presents a comprehensive analysis of a work-based learning model based on the principles of PBL and its positive synergistic effect on students, industries, and communities. The model is active in multiple communities in the United States. This paper will focus on the synergistic effect in a rural region of the upper Midwest. The model integrates academic instruction with hands-on industry experience, cultivating a collaborative environment that prepares future engineers to address complex challenges.
The paper explores how the model’s partnerships with local and regional industries provide students with immersive, real-world learning experiences that enhance technical competencies, boost employability, and foster a mindset of lifelong learning. The paper also explores how industry partnerships drive innovation and generate social and economic benefits for the region, contributing to its resilience and growth. By supplying a skilled workforce to local industries, the model plays a critical role in community development, addressing both immediate industry needs and long-term sustainability. Additionally, the paper underscores the importance of community engagement, demonstrating how an integrated approach between academia, industry, and local stakeholders can yield significant advancements in engineering education and societal progress.
The findings offer insights into the transformative potential of work-based learning models linking education, industry, and community engagement, advancing engineering education and broader societal development.
References
Bates, R., Pluskwik, E., & Ulseth, R. (2020). Startup of an innovative program x3 – Iron Range Engineering propagated. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Bates, R., Ulseth, R., Mann, C., & Chase, L. (2024). Moving from industry-sponsored academic projects to supporting student learning in industry. In Approaches to Work-Based Learning in Higher Education (pp. 106-124). Routledge.
Beanland, D. G., & Hadgraft, R. (2013). UNESCO report: Engineering education. Melbourne.
Christensen, D., Singelmann, L., Mann, C., Johnson, B., & Ulseth, R. (2023). The Bell Academy: A bridge semester where engineering students transform into student engineers who thrive in industry placements. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). https://doi.org/10.21427/BXVQ- XR47
Dolmans, D. H., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I. H., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. (2005). Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7), 732-741.
Graham, R. (2018). The global state of the art in engineering education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Johnson, B., & Ulseth, R. (2017). Student experience for the development of professional competencies in a project-based learning curriculum. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(3), 1031- 1047. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6896342
Johnson, B., & Ulseth, R., & Raich, M. (2022, August). A multi-decade response to the call for change. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2—40664
Johnson, B., Ulseth, R., & Wang, Y. (2018). Applying design-based research to new work-integrated PBL model (The Iron Range Engineering Bell Program). Proceedings of the 2018 International Research Symposium on PBL, Tsinghua University, China.
Kolmos, A., Krogh, L., & Fink, F. (2007). The Aalborg PBL model. Aalborg University Press.
Lindsay, E., & Morgan, J. (2021). The CSU engineering model: Educating student engineers through PBL, WPL, and an online, on-demand curriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(5), 637- 661.
Sorby, S., & Fortenberry, N. (2021). Stuck in 1955: Engineering education needs a revolution. Issues in Science and Technology.
Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field (Vol. 2). Jossey-Bass.
Ulseth, R. (2016). Self-directed learning in PBL. Aalborg Universitetsforlag. https://doi.org/10.5278/vbn.phd.engsci.00091
Ulseth, R., & Johnson, B. (2020). Design-based research: Students building workplace skills in a new education model. Educate for the Future: PBL, Sustainability and Digitalisation 2020. Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Ulseth, R., & Johnson, B. (2023). From project-based to work-based learning: Learnings from an educational transformation process. 9th International Research Symposium on PBL (IRSPBL 2023) and Transforming Engineering Education (TEE 2023) Conference, Boston, MA.
Ulseth, R., Ewert, D., & Johnson, B. (2011). Work in progress – Implementation of a project-based learning curriculum. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. F1F-1). IEEE.
Ulseth, R., Johnson, B., & Kennedy, C. (2021). Iron Range Engineering. Advances in Engineering Education, 9(3). Available: https://advances.asee.org/iron-range-engineering/
University of Maastricht. (n.d.). Four learning principles of PBL. Retrieved from https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/four-learning-principles-pbl
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
