The Importance of Diverse Economic Contexts in African Student Success

Authors

  • Helen Inglis University of Pretoria
  • Esther Matemba Curtin University
  • Disaapele Mogashana University of Pretoria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11089

Keywords:

Student success, Grounded theory, Economic context

Abstract

Existing research into student success may not be useful to develop interventions which can improve outcomes for engineering students in Africa, since they fail to account for diversity in local contexts. In our larger project we are using Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM) to investigate student success in African engineering education, interpreted through the experiences of educators. This phase of the project aims to understand better what is meant by “student success” in African engineering education, and to articulate the contexts which impact student success. We recruited participants who had at least five years’ experience in engineering education in African institutions. We conducted a focus group with three participants, and individual semi-structured interviews with four participants. The seven participants are from six African countries and include lecturers as well as academic leaders. Our findings in this paper focus on national and institutional economic contexts. National policies governing funding of university studies, as well as historic funding strategies, contribute significantly to contextual diversity. Institutional contexts include the physical and staffing resources available, whether the institution is private or state-funded, and the socio-economic status distribution of the student body. Based on our analysis of the data, we propose a model in which economic factors are understood as emerging from interactions between national, institutional and personal context. 

References

Ahmed, N., Kloot, B., Collier-Reed, B. I. (2015). Why students leave engineering and built environment programmes when they are academically eligible to continue. European Journal of Engineering Education, 40(2), 128–144. https://doi-org.uplib.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.928670

Asghar, M., Minichiello, A., & Ahmed, S. (2024). Mental health and wellbeing of undergraduate students in engineering: A systematic literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(4), 1046-1075. https://doi-org.uplib.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/jee.20574

Boles, W., & Whelan, K. (2017). Barriers to student success in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(4), 368–381. https://doi-org.uplib.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1189879

Bolu, C. A., Azeta, J., Mallo, S. J., Ismaila, S. O., Dada, J. O., Aderounmu, S., Ismail, A., & Oyetunji, E. (2020, November). Engineering students' virtual learning challenges during covid-19 pandemic lockdown: A case study. 2020 IFEES World Engineering Education Forum-Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF- GEDC). IEEE. https://doi-org.uplib.idm.oclc.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC49885.2020.9293681

Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2019). The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory. Sage.

Gesun, J. S., Major, J. C., Berger, E., Godwin, A., Jensen, K. J., Chen, J., & Froiland, J. M. (2021). A scoping literature review of engineering thriving to redefine student success. Studies in Engineering Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.21061/see.9

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. Hull, S. (2013). Doing Grounded Theory: Notes for the Aspiring Qualitative Analyst. Division of Geomatics, University of Cape Town.

Inglis, H. M., & Matemba, E. (2021). Starting the conversation with African engineering educators about student success. In REES AAEE 2021 conference: Engineering Education Research Capability Development: (pp. 1046-1054). Perth, WA: Engineers Australia.

Inglis, H., Mogashana, D., & Matemba, E. (2023, July). Learning to use the Grounded Theory method to explore student success in African contexts. In Conference of the South African Society for Engineering Education (p. 98).

Mashiyane, T., Salifu, S., Ogunbiyi, O., & Oketola, A. (2024). Challenges, strategies and recommendations for reengineering engineering education in sub-Saharan Africa: A review. Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(1), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.54327/set2024/v4.i1.102

Masuku, A. S., & Sibiya, N. (2025). Students’ Risk of Depression: Student Affairs Practitioners’ Perspectives at a South African University of Technology. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v7i1.1410

Minalla, A. (2021). Concerns Fronting Engineering Education in Sudan: A Review. ASEAN Journal of Engineering Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/ajee2021.5n2.72

Mlambo, Y.A., (2021), Black African women in engineering higher education in South Africa, in H.K. Ro, F. Fernandez & E.J. Ramon (eds.), Gender equity in STEM in higher education: International perspectives on policy, institutional culture, and individual choice (pp. 158-173), Routledge.

Mogashana, D.G., (2015). The interplay between structure and agency: How academic development programme students ‘make their way’ through their undergraduate studies in engineering. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town]. OpenUCT. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16601

Mohamedbhai, G. (2015). Engineering education in sub-Saharan Africa: Quest for quality. International Journal of African Higher Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.6017/ijahe.v2i1.9259

Nunes, J. M. B., Martins, J. T., Zhou, L., Alajamy, M., & Al-Mamari, S. (2010). Contextual sensitivity in grounded theory: The role of pilot studies. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(2), 73-84.

Naidoo, A., & McKay, T. J. M. (2018). Student funding and student success: A case study of a South African university. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(5), 158-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.20853/32- 5-2565

Setlogelo, D. (2008). Student success in an introductory engineering course: An investigation of approach to learning and cultural capital, [Masters dissertation, University of Cape Town]. OpenUCT. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/14732

Times Higher Education (2025) World University Rankings 2025, retrieved 21 March 2025 from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2025/world-ranking

Tinto, V. (2014). Tinto’s South Africa lectures. Journal of Student Affairs in Africa, 2(2), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.14426/jsaa.v2i2.66

Van der Merwe, A., & Maharaj, B. (2018, November). Factors affecting engineering student success. 2018 World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC). IEEE. https://doi-org.uplib.idm.oclc.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC.2018.8629771

Zakharov, A., Tsheko, G., & Carnoy, M. (2016). Do “better” teachers and classroom resources improve student achievement? A causal comparative approach in Kenya, South Africa, and Swaziland. International Journal of Educational Development, 50, 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.07.001

Downloads

Published

14-11-2025

How to Cite

Inglis, H., Matemba, E., & Mogashana, D. (2025). The Importance of Diverse Economic Contexts in African Student Success . Proceedings from the International Research Symposium on Problem-Based Learning (IRSPBL). https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11089

Issue

Section

Theme 4: Sustainability, Professional Practice, and Global Transformation