CREATE-ing New Perspectives: A Transformative Learning Approach to Sustainability in First-Year Engineering Education

Bronwyn Swartz

doi:10.54337/irspbl-11104

Authors

Bronwyn Swartz Cape Peninsula University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11104

Keywords:

Transformative learning, Sustainability, Challenge-based learning, Creative expression

Abstract

This paper examines how integrating challenge-based/problem-based learning (CBL/PBL) with creative expression triggers perspective transformation in first-year engineering students' understanding of sustainability. The Crafting Resourceful Engineering and Artistic Transformations for Education (CREATE) project, framed by Mezirow's Transformative Learning Theory, used artistic creation as a disorienting dilemma to challenge preexisting assumptions about engineering's role in sustainability while developing ECSA Graduate Attributes.

Funded by South African Society for Engineering Education (SASEE), the project engaged students with SDGs through four interconnected assessments: individual essays and presentations, group artistic artifacts and TikTok videos. First-year engineering students consulted with a Fine Arts student on project designs, creating interdisciplinary collaborations that challenged traditional engineering paradigms.

Longitudinal survey data revealed evidence of perspective transformation aligned with Mezirow's theory. Students progressed from viewing sustainability as isolated technical problems to understanding it as interconnections between society, technology, and environment. This shift was evident in their enhanced ability to communicate technical concepts while considering broader societal implications—a key indicator of transformative learning in engineering education.

References

Beckett, S. W. (2018). The role of Mezirow's ten phases of transformative learning in the development of global leaders. Pepperdine University.

Byrne, E. P., & Mullally, G. (2016). Seeing beyond silos: Transdisciplinary approaches to education as a means of addressing sustainability issues. New developments in engineering education for sustainable development, 23-34. Springer International: Switzerland.

Christie, M. (2003). Transformative and transferable learning in engineering education. In European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) Conference.

Freire, P. (1970). Cultural action and conscientization. Harvard educational review, 40(3), 452-477. Graham, R. (2018). The global state of the art in engineering education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Report, Massachusetts, USA.

Gwynne-Evans, A. J., Chetty, M., & Junaid, S. (2021). Repositioning ethics at the heart of engineering graduate attributes. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 26(1), 7-24.

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New directions for adult and continuing education, 1997(74), 5-12.

Mezirow, J. (2010) ‘Transformative learning in practice : insights from community, workplace, and higher education’. Edited by Taylor, E. W. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Nohl, A. M. (2015). Typical phases of transformative learning: A practice-based model. Adult Education Quarterly, 65(1), 35-49.

Sahin Izmirli, Ö., & Kabakci Yurdakul, I. (2014). Investigation of Prospective Teachers' Information and Communication Technology Integration Practices in Terms of Transformative Learning Theory. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(6), 2293-2303.

Shandilya, S., Yoon, S. Y., Raju, G., & Kwuimy, C. A. (2023). Engineering Students' Transformative Learning Experiences from A Virtual International Collaborative Experiential Program. In 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.