Addressing Wicked Problems Through Empathy-enhanced Design-based Team Learning

Illustrating Implicit and Explicit Approach

Authors

  • Jan Van Maele KU Leuven
  • Diana Bairaktarova Virginia Tech
  • Veerle Bloemen KU Leuven
  • Inês Direito University of Aveiro, Portugal; University College London, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11113

Keywords:

Empathy, Design-based learning, Engineering education, Wicked problems, Project-based learning

Abstract

This practice paper aims at contributing to the conversation about caring pedagogies and sustainable engineering education by focusing on empathy, ‘the ability to understand people by perceiving or experiencing their life situations’. Based on our experiences as engineering educators in Europe and North America, we offer examples of how design-based learning can be enhanced through the purposeful integration of empathy nurturing activities at every stage of the team project work. More specifically, we describe an approach in which empathy is an explicit focus of learning activities and an approach in which empathy is a more implicit learning outcome that is embedded within broader transversal learning goals. The design projects we offer as illustrations center on ‘wicked problems’ that affect various stakeholders beyond technical experts. By encouraging a decentralized, multi-perspective approach, wicked problems can enhance a caring pedagogy in project-based learning. By integrating empathy with technical expertise, be it explicitly or in more implicit ways, we highlight the crucial role of emotional intelligence, ethical decision- making, and interpersonal skills in engineering practice—an approach that cultivates responsibility and equips individuals to tackle real-world challenges with compassion and ethical insight. 

References

Bairaktarova, D. (2022). Caring for the Future: Empathy in Engineering Education to Empower Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(3), 502–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20476

Bairaktarova, D., Bloemen, V., Direito, I., & Van Maele, J. (2024). ‘I’ve learned that behind every headline there is a human with their story’: Gearing up engineering design projects for nurturing empathy. Proceedings of the 52nd annual conference of SEFI. Lausanne, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14256781

Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking creates new alternatives for business and society. Harvard Business Press.

Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.

Buxton, B. (2007). Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann.

Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Westview Press. de Bono, E. (1986). Six thinking hats. Viking.

de Wit, B., &Meyer, R. (2005). Strategy synthesis. Resolving strategy paradoxes to create competitive advantage. Thomson.

Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. Elmansy, R. (2021, February 9). The Double Diamond design thinking process and how to use it.

Designorate. https://www.designorate.com/the-double-diamond-design-thinking-process-and-how-to-use- it/

Greenberg, S., Carpendale, S., Marquardt, N., & Buxton, B. (2011). Sketching user experiences: The workbook. Morgan Kaufmann.

Hansen, B. (2022, May 31). 7 techniques for more effective brainstorming. https://www.wrike.com/blog/techniques-effective-brainstorming/

Hermsen, P. E. A., van Dommelen, S., & Espinosa, P. H. (2023). Reflection on your personal perspective through the perspective of others. A step in dealing with wicked problems. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). Dublin, Ireland. https://arrow.tudublin.ie/sefi2023_wkshp/11/

Kouprie, M., & Visser, F. S. (2009). A framework for empathy in design: Stepping into and out of the user’s life. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(5), 437–448.

Lönngren, L., & van Poeck, K. (2021). Wicked problems: a mapping review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(6), 481-502. DOI 10.1080/13504509.2020.1859415

Mattelmäki, T., & Sleeswijk Visser, F. (2011). Lost in CO-X - Interpretations of Co-Design and Co-Creation. In L.-L. C. Norbert Roozenburg (Ed.), Proceedings of IASDR'11, 4th World Conference on Design Research, Delft University. International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR).

Rittel, H.W., & Webber, M.W. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. DOI 10.1007/BF01405730

Rogers, C., & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). Merrill.

Segal, E. A. (2011). Social empathy: A model built on empathy, contextual understanding, and social responsibility that promotes social justice. Journal of Social Service Research 37(3), 266–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2011.564040

Sochacka, N., Walther, J., Miller, S., & Youngblood, K. (2020). Facilitating empathic communication modules in undergraduate engineering education. A handbook (version 3). The University of Georgia. https://eeti.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Empathy-Modules-Workbook_2020_v3.pdf

Taylor, A., & Bancilhon, C. (2019). Back to basics: How to make stakeholder engagement meaningful for your company. BSR. https://www.bsr.org/en/reports/stakeholder-engagement-five-step-approach-toolkit

Van Maele, J., Vassilicos, B. (2015). Making way for the intercultural in engineering education: new spaces for embracing the tensions. In: K. Hawash & C. Léger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd SEFI Annual Conference 2015. Diversity in engineering education: an opportunity to face the new trends of engineering. SEFI. https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/56344-J.-VAN-MAELE.pdf

Van Maele, J., Bairaktarova, D., Bloemen, V., & Direito, I. (2025). Engaging more widely in design projects for engineering students. Student reflections on their experience with and the perceived impact of empathic imagination tasks. [Manuscript in preparation].

Walther, J., Miller, S. E., & Sochacka, N. W. (2017). A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional way of being: A model of empathy in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 123–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20159

Walther, J., & Sochacka, N. W. (forthcoming). Interpretive research design. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

14-11-2025

How to Cite

Van Maele, J., Bairaktarova, D., Bloemen, V., & Direito, I. (2025). Addressing Wicked Problems Through Empathy-enhanced Design-based Team Learning: Illustrating Implicit and Explicit Approach. Proceedings from the International Research Symposium on Problem-Based Learning (IRSPBL). https://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11113

Issue

Section

Theme 5: Emotions, Well-being, Collaboration, and Social Responsibility