Computational Porosity

Benjamin, Lācis and Algorithmic Life

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/aau.add.scai-11425

Keywords:

Porosity, Walter Benjamin, Computation, Dialectics, Agency, Materiality, Asja Lācis, Generative AI

Abstract

This article develops the concept of computational porosity to understand how contemporary computational systems blur distinctions between human and machine agencies through layered infrastructures of code, data, and automated decision-making. Drawing upon Walter Benjamin and Asja Lācis's 1925 essay, Naples, we argue that their analysis of urban architecture and social life offers a productive theoretical framework for analysing computational systems. Benjamin and Lācis identified porosity as a critical concept to describe Naples, where boundaries between private and public, sacred and profane, work and leisure became fluid through the material structure of the city. We extend this concept to examine how computational infrastructures similarly create porous conditions through three key dimensions: (1) infrastructural porosity, where computational layers interact across hardware, software, and networks (2)  temporal porosity, where computational time operates non-linearly through caching, prediction, and asynchronous processes and (3) agential porosity, where human and algorithmic decision-making become entangled in ways that resist clear agential identity. Rather than treating computation as a closed system of discrete operations, we demonstrate how porosity reveals the improvisational, threshold-crossing character of contemporary computational practice. This perspective challenges deterministic accounts of computational agency and opens space for understanding how computational systems might be sites of unexpected possibilities and unforeseen constellations, much as Benjamin and Lācis observed in Neapolitan street life.

References

Adorno, T. W. (2003) So müßte ich ein Engel und kein Autor sein. In W. Schopf (Ed.), Der Briefwechsel mit Peter Suhrkamp und Siegfried Unseld. (p. 97.) Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Amoore, L. (2023). Machine learning political orders. Review of International Studies, 49(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000031

Amoore, L., Campolo, A., Jacobsen, B., & Rella, L. (2024). A world model: On the political logics of generative AI. Political Geography, 113, 103134. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLGEO.2024.103134

Anderson, D.N. (2019) ‘Digital Platforms, Porosity, and Panorama’, Surveillance & Society, 17(1/2), pp. 14–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12937.

Benjamin, W. (1930). ‘Theorien des deutschen Faschismus: Zu der Sammelschrift 'Krieg und Krieger' herausgegeben von Ernst Jünger," Die Gesellschaft, 7 (2), 32-41.

Benjamin, W. (1999). The Author as Producer. In M. W. Jennings, H. Eiland, & G. Smith (Eds.), Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings Volume 2, part 2 1931-1934 (pp. 768–782). Belknap Press. (original work written in 1934)

Benjamin, W. (2008). The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility. In M. W. Jennings, B. Doherty, & T. Y. Levin (Eds.), The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media (pp. 19–55). Harvard University Press. (original work written in 1936)

Benjamin, W. (2014). Radio Benjamin. Verso. (original radio play on Naples broadcast in 1930)

Benjamin, W., & Lācis, A. (1996). Naples. In M. Bullock & M. W. Jennings (Eds.), Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings Volume 1, 1913-1926 (pp. 414–421). Belknap Press. (original work published in 1925).

Berry, D.M. (2014) Critical theory and the digital. Bloomsbury Academic.

Berry, D. M. (2021) ‘Explanatory publics: explainability and democratic thought’, in B. Balaskas and C. Rito (eds) Fabricating Publics: The Dissemination of Culture in the Post-truth Era. London: Open Humanities Press, pp. 211–232. http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/books/titles/fabricating-publics/

Berry, D.M. (2023) ‘The Explainability Turn’, Digital Humanities Quarterly, 017(2). Available at: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/17/2/000685/000685.html.

Berry, D. M. (2024a) Reflections on Method for Critical Code Studies, Stunlaw, https://stunlaw.blogspot.com/2024/12/reflections-on-method-for-critical-code.html

Berry, D. M. (2024b) Algorithm and code: explainability, interpretability and policy, in Handbook on Public Policy and Artificial Intelligence. Edward Elgar, pp. 134-146.

Berry, D.M. (2025) Synthetic media and computational capitalism: towards a critical theory of artificial intelligence, AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02265-2.

Cant, C. (2019) Riding for Deliveroo: Resistance in the New Economy. Polity Press.

Crawford, K., & Paglen, T. (2021). Excavating AI: the politics of images in machine learning training sets. AI and Society, 36(4), 1105–1116.

Eiland, H., & Jennings, M. W. (2014). Walter Benjamin: A Critical Life. Belknap Press.

Glynn, R. (2020) ‘Porosity and its Discontents: Approaching Naples in Critical Theory’, Cultural Critique, 107(1), pp. 63–98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2020.0012.

Jameson, F. (2020). The Benjamin Files. Verso.

Kellogg, K.C., Valentine, M.A. and Christin, A. (2020) Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control, Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), pp. 366–410.

Lilla, M. (1995) ‘The Riddle of Walter Benjamin’, The New York Review of Books, 25 May. Available at: https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/05/25/the-riddle-of-walter-benjamin/ (Accessed: 12 December 2024).

Marino, M.C. (2020) Critical code studies. The MIT Press (Software studies).

McGill, J. (2008) ‘The Porous Coupling of Walter Benjamin and Asja Lacis’, Angelaki, 13(2), pp. 59–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09697250802432120.

Mody C. C. M., Bijker W. E., Carlson W. B., Pinch T. (2017) The Long Arm of Moore’s Law: Microelectronics and American Science. MIT Press.

Rosenblat, A. (2019) Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work. University of California Press.

Smith, D. (2021) ‘Porosity and the Transnational: Travelling Theory between Naples and Frankfurt (Walter Benjamin, Asja Lacis and Ernst Bloch)’, Forum for Modern Language Studies, 57(2), pp. 240–259. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cqab001.

Wizisla, E. (2016). Walter Benjamin and Bertolt Brecht The Story of a Friendship. Verso.

Zaporozhets, O. (2016) ‘Subway And Digital Porosity Of The City’. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/29375359/SUBWAY_AND_DIGITAL_POROSITY_OF_THE_CITY.

Downloads

Published

24-03-2026

How to Cite

Berry, D., & De Cock, C. (2026). Computational Porosity: Benjamin, Lācis and Algorithmic Life. Controversies of AI Society. https://doi.org/10.54337/aau.add.scai-11425