What Employees Expect from AI
Characteristics and Directionality Within a Plurality of AI Expectations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/aau.add.scai-11427Keywords:
AI, AI expectations, Organizational adoptionAbstract
AI is viewed as the next major technological breakthrough for organizations. The range of areas, professions, and practices that can be improved with AI assistance or automation is overwhelming. However, this wide array of possibilities also brings a variety of expectations about how AI will change organizations and employees’ everyday work. Considering that voiced expectations influence adoption processes by both reflecting and shaping certain relational, belief-driven dynamics, we can learn a great deal about AI adoption by studying the organizational plurality of AI expectations. Therefore, this study examined AI expectations held by employees in three organizations currently adopting AI for use in the workplace. The study is based on a thematic analysis of empirical material form 15 focus groups in three Swedish AI-adopting organizations and shows how AI expectations shape the following: (1) a growing desire to move from exploring AI to establishing AI routines and regulations, (2) emerging dilemmas related to both the violation and fulfillment of AI promises, and (3) how dynamics and unpredictability in the AI field require organizations to adapt to shifting trends and innovations.
References
Alvesson, M. (2019). Extra allt!: när samhälls- och människoförbättrandet slår tillbaka. Fri Tanke.
Bareis, J., & Katzenbach, C. (2022). Talking AI into being: The narratives and imaginaries of national AI strategies and their performative politics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 47(5), 855–881. DOI:10.1177/01622439211030007
Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Harvard University Press.
Bordia, P., Hobman, E., Jones, E., Gallios, C., & Callan, V. (2004). Uncertainty during organizational change: Types, consequences, and management strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBU.0000028449.99127.f7
Bordia, P., Hunt, E., Paulsen, N., Tourish, D., & DiFonzo, N. (2004). Uncertainty during organizational change: Is it all about control? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(3), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000128
Bornemark, J. (2018). Det omätbaras renässans: en uppgörelse med pedanternas världsherravälde. Volante
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 285–298. DOI: 10.1080/09537320600777002
Buschmeyer, K., Hatfield, S., Heine, I., Jahn, S. & Markus, A. L. (2022) Expectation management in AI implementation projects: a case study. EuroMed Journal of Business, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 441-451. DOI 10.1108/EMJB-10-2021-0161
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Christensen, E. (2025). Organizing expectations: The co-constitutive dynamics of AI imaginaries. Human Communication Research, 51(4), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaf014
Corsini, F., Annesi, N., & Frey, M. (2025). The role of AI in museums’ journey towards sustainable development: Socio-technical imaginaries of a cultural and organizational transformation. Technovation, 146, Article 103280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103280
Ellström, P.-E., Elg, M., Wallo, A., Berglund, M., & Kock, H. (2020). Interactive research: Concepts, contributions and challenges. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(8), 1517–1537. DOI 10.1108/JMTM-09-2018-0304
Engström, A., Pittino, D., Mohlin, A., Edh, N., & Johansson, A. (2025). A paradox perspective on early AI adoption: Understanding temporal and relational tensions. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 38(7), 1145–1171. DOI:10.1108/JOCM-02-2025-0086
Engström, A., Pittino, D., Mohlin, A., Johansson, A., & Edh Mirzaei, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence and work transformations: Integrating sensemaking and workplace learning perspectives. Information Technology & People, 37(7), 2441–2461. DOI 10.1108/ITP-01-2023-0048
Grimes, M. G., Schuetzler, R. M., & Giboney, J. C. (2021). Mental models and expectation violations in conversational AI interactions. Decision Support Systems, 144, Article 113515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113515
Gulbrandsen, I. T., & Just, S. N. (2024). Artificial intelligence in organizational communication: Challenges, opportunities, and implications. In M. N. Ndlela (Ed.), Organizational communication in the digital era: Examining the impact of AI, chatbots, and Covid-19. Springer International Publishing AG.
Gustafsson, N. (2014). Traditionella och virtuella fokusgrupper [Traditional and virtual focus groups]. In J. Eksell & Å. Thelander (Eds.), Kvalitativa metoder i strategisk kommunikation. Studentlitteratur.
Hautala, J., & Ahlqvist, T. (2024). Integrating futures imaginaries, expectations and anticipatory practices: Practitioners of artificial intelligence between now and future. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(9), 2100–2112. DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2022.2130041
Hautala, J. & Heino, H., (2023. Spectrum of AI futures imaginaries by AI practitioners in Finland and Singapore: The unimagined speed of AI progress. Futures, 153 (2023), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103247
Hirsch‑Kreinsen, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence: A “promising technology.” AI & Society, 39, 1641–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01629-w
Howitt, D. (2019). Introduction to qualitative research methods in psychology: Putting theory into practice. Pearson.
Jackson, I., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Namdar, J. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in supply chain and operations management: A capability-based framework for analysis and implementation. International Journal of Production Research, 62(17), 6120–6145. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2309309
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear regulation in the U.S. and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41821489
Jensen, V. V., Alami, A., Rysholt Bruun, A., & Stouby Persson, J. (2025). Managing expectations towards AI tools for software development: A multiple‑case study. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 23, 869–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-025-00704-7
Kannelønning, M. S. (2023). Contesting futures of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare: Formal expectations meet informal anticipations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(11), 3845–3856. DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2023.2226243
Lewis, L. K. (2014). Organizational change and innovation. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. SAGE.
Lewis, L. K. (2019). Organizational change: Creating change through strategic communication. John Wiley & Sons.
Li, F., & Wang, H. (2025). Unveiling the mechanics of AI adoption in journalism: A multi-factorial exploration of expectation confirmation, knowledge management, and sustainable use. Journalism and Media, 6(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6020065
Lindgren, S. (2024). Critical theory of AI. Polity Press.
Lomborg, S., & Kapsch, P. H. (2020). Decoding algorithms. Media, Culture & Society, 42(5), 745–761. DOI: 10.1177/0163443719855301
March, J. G. (1981). Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 563–577. http://www.jstor.com/stable/2392340?seq=1&cid=pdfreference#references_tab_contents
McPhee, R. D., & Zaug, P. (2001). Organizational theory, organizational communication, organizational knowledge, and problematic integration. Journal of Communication, 51(3), 574–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02897.x
Nguyen, M., Mehrotra, A., Malik, A., & Pandey, R. (2025). Nexus between generative AI engagement, quality and expectation formation: An application of expectation–confirmation theory. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 38(3), 798–820. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2024-0452
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
Seto, K. S. (2025). AI from the South: Artificial intelligence in Latin America through the sociotechnical imaginaries of Brazilian tech workers. Globalizations. DOI:10.1080/14747731.2025.2465166
Sondern, D., Arnholz, N., & Hertel, G. (2025). Employment Negotiations With an Algorithm? How AI as Negotiation Counterpart Would Affect Negotiators' Trust and Subjective Value Expectations. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 2025, 0, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21472
Stevens, M., Wehrens, R., Kostenzer, J., Weggelaar-Jansen, A. M., & De Bont, A. (2022). Why personal dreams matter: How professionals affectively engage with the promises surrounding data-driven healthcare in Europe. Big Data & Society, 9(1), 1–13. DOI: 10.1177/20539517211070698
van Lente, H. (2012). Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations: Lessons from the sociology of expectations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(8), 769–782. DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2012.715478
Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.
Willcocks, L. (2020). Robo-apocalypse cancelled? Reframing the automation and future of work debate. Journal of Information Technology, 35(4), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220925830
Willim, R. (2024). Mundania: How and where technologies are made ordinary. Bristol University Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nina Edh, Otto Hedenmo, Maria Riveiro, Annika Engström, Carla Gonçalves Machado, Daniel Pittino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
