The Laundry Care LCA project

Authors

  • Stefano Zuin Electrolux, Italy
  • Vsevolod Dengin AB Electrolux
  • Valentina Perzolla Electrolux, Italy
  • Francesca Bisaro Electrolux, Italy
  • Mario Michele Pipita Electrolux, Italy
  • Alberto Azzano Electrolux, Italy
  • Fabio Garzena Electrolux, Italy
  • Elisa Stabon Electrolux, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10281

Keywords:

LCA, garment, lifetime, care index, washing cycles

Abstract

The fashion industry is increasingly scrutinized for the environmental footprint it generates. Despite this, less attention is placed on the possibility to reduce part of this footprint thanks to attitudes and daily actions that users can take in their homes. A life cycle assessment of three selected garments was performed to analyze the potential environmental benefits of an extended usage of garments thanks to the utilization of different washing treatments. Results showed that the garment production phase has consistently the highest impact. Within the use stage, the relevance of wash cycles was investigated by comparing various cycles in both the European and North America regions, and by highlighting the contribution of different energy mixes and detergent types. The data demonstrated that washing machine users can reduce the impact of garments by, for example, washing them at lower temperature, as this results in slower deterioration. Therefore, the environmental impacts per wear of garments can be reduced by around 50% by doubling the expected number of garments uses.  

References

AHAM, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers. (2013). Performance Evaluation Procedures for Household Clothes Washers. AHAM HLW-1-2013.

AISE, International Association for Soaps, Detergents and Maintenance Products (2019). Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR). Household Heavy Duty Liquid Laundry Detergents (HDLLD) for machine wash. September 2019. Version 1.2

Bates Kassatly, V. (2024). Sustainable Fashion - Could it all be in the hands of the Consumer? Veronica Bates Kassatly. https://www.veronicabateskassatly.com/read/sustainable-fashion-could-it-all-be-in-the-hands-of-the-consumer

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2017). A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future. A New Textiles Economy: Redesigning Fashion's Future

IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis

Quantis. (2022). Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) for Apparel and Footwear. Draft. Version 1.3 – First draft PEFCR, 28 March 2022.

Zampori, L., & Pant, R. (2019). Suggestions for updating the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method, EUR 29682 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2019, https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/424613. JRC115959.

Downloads

Published

24-06-2025

How to Cite

Zuin, S., Dengin, V., Perzolla, V., Bisaro, F., Pipita, M. M., Azzano, A., … Stabon, E. (2025). The Laundry Care LCA project. Proceedings of the 6th Product Lifetimes and the Environment Conference (PLATE2025), (6). https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10281

Issue

Section

Track 11: Clothing, Footwear, and Accessories – Research Papers