Existing barriers to consumer repair of small household appliances from a product design approach
A scoping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10288Keywords:
Product design, Household appliance, Repair barriers, ConsumersAbstract
Small Household Appliances (SHA) and their associated electric and electronic waste are a major concern for the EU, which is tackling this problem with an emphasis in repair as a key strategy to prolong product lifetime. The field of product design plays a fundamental role in the configuration of products to enable their future repair. Therefore, this study explores the main barriers that consumers face when trying to repair their household appliances through a literature scoping review focused on small household appliances, from the product design and the repair ecosystem aspects. This study proposes a novel classification at product system level and product-service system level barriers. The first level relates to the physical product and its repairability, while the second relates to the entire system surrounding the product and the repair experience. According to the literature, most relevant repair barriers from the product system level were ‘Understanding of product operation’ (specially ‘Product complexity’), ‘Product accessibility’ (specially ‘Difficult disassembly and reassembly’), ‘Impossibility to repair’, ‘Obsolescence’ and ‘Safety concerns’. From the product-service system level, the most relevant were ‘Economic factors’, ‘Consumer factors’ (specially ‘Lack of time’), ‘Access to information’ and ‘Lack of support by OEM’. The discussion section points out that some of these barriers may be downplayed by shifting the mindset of the SHA industry, currently focused on cost reduction, towards quality and repairability. Finally, least mentioned barriers in the literature are worth of attention and shouldn’t be forgotten, as they point to possible research gaps.
References
Amend, C., Revellio, F., Tenner, I., & Schaltegger, S. (2022). The potential of modular product design on repair behavior and user experience – Evidence from the smartphone industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367, 132770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132770
Bakker, C., Wang, F., Huisman, J., & Den Hollander, M. (2014). Products that go round: Exploring product life extension through design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 69, 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.028
Blanco-Espeleta, E., Pérez-Belis, V., & Bovea, M. D. (2024). Repair index of energy-related products: Application to capsule coffee machines. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 46, 146-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.02.011
Boix Rodríguez, N., & Favi, C. (2022). Disassembly Analysis of Gas Cooktops: Towards Eco-Design Rules for Product Repairability. Volume 5: 27th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC), V005T05A017. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2022-89860
Boix Rodríguez, N., & Favi, C. (2023). De-manufacturing Analysis for Product Repairability and Serviceability in Cooking Systems. En F. G. Galizia & M. Bortolini (Eds.), Production Processes and Product Evolution in the Age of Disruption (pp. 452-460). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34821-1_49
Bracquené, E., Peeters, J., Alfieri, F., Sanfélix, J., Duflou, J., Dewulf, W., & Cordella, M. (2021). Analysis of evaluation systems for product repairability: A case study for washing machines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125122
Cooper, T. (2004). Inadequate Life?Evidence of Consumer Attitudes to Product Obsolescence. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27(4), 421-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-004-2284-6
Dangal, S., Faludi, J., & Balkenende, R. (2022). Design Aspects in Repairability Scoring Systems: Comparing Their Objectivity and Completeness. Sustainability, 14(14), 8634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148634
Fachbach, I., Lechner, G., & Reimann, M. (2022). Drivers of the consumers’ intention to use repair services, repair networks and to self-repair. Journal of Cleaner Production, 346, 130969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130969
Flipsen, B., Bakker, C., & Van Bohemen, G. (2016). Developing a reparability indicator for electronic products. 2016 Electronics Goes Green 2016+ (EGG), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/EGG.2016.7829855
Hertzum, M. (2024). Sustainability and Home Automation: The Case of Repairing or Replacing Vacuum Cleaners. En A. Bramwell-Dicks, A. Evans, M. Winckler, H. Petrie, & J. Abdelnour-Nocera (Eds.), Design for Equality and Justice (Vol. 14535, pp. 340-347). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61688-4_33
Hjorth Nielsen, A. S. A., Laursen, L. N., & Tollestrup, C. (2023). Can you fix it? An investigation of critical repair steps and barriers across product types. PROCEEDINGS 5th PLATE Conference, 409-416.
Huang, J., Esmaeilian, B., & Behdad, S. (2016). Design for Ease-of-Repair: Insights From Consumers’ Repair Experiences. Volume 4: 21st Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference; 10th International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems, V004T05A017. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-59685
Jaeger-Erben, M., Frick, V., & Hipp, T. (2021). Why do users (not) repair their devices? A study of the predictors of repair practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 125382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125382
Jensen, P. B., Laursen, L. N., & Haase, L. M. (2021). Barriers to product longevity: A review of business, product development and user perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127951
Joore, P., & Brezet, H. (2015). A Multilevel Design Model: The mutual relationship between product-service system development and societal change processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.043
Korsunova, A., Heiskanen, E., & Vainio, A. (2023). Consumer decision-making on repair in a circular economy: A process model based on experiences among young adults and stakeholders in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 405, 137052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137052
Laitala, K., Klepp, I. G., Haugrønning, V., Throne-Holst, H., & Strandbakken, P. (2021). Increasing repair of household appliances, mobile phones and clothing: Experiences from consumers and the repair industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 282, 125349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125349
Lefebvre, M., Lofthouse, V., & Wilson, G. (2018, junio 28). Towards a Circular Economy: Exploring factors to repair broken electrical and electronics products by users with pro-environmental inclination. Design Research Society Conference 2018. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.556
Lundberg, P., Vainio, A., Viholainen, N., & Korsunova, A. (2024). Consumers and self-repair: What do they repair, what skills do they have and what are they willing to learn? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 206, 107647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107647
Pérez-Belis, V., Braulio-Gonzalo, M., Juan, P., & Bovea, M. D. (2017). Consumer attitude towards the repair and the second-hand purchase of small household electrical and electronic equipment. A Spanish case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 158, 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.143
Pozo Arcos, B., Bakker, C., & Balkenende, R. (2023). How User Manuals Support the Diagnosis of Common Faults in Household Appliances: An Analysis of 150 Manuals. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3(1), 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00195-5
Pozo Arcos, B., Bakker, C., Flipsen, B., & Balkenende, R. (2020). Practices of fault diagnosis in household appliances: Insights for design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121812
Pozo Arcos, B., Dangal, S., Bakker, C., Faludi, J., & Balkenende, R. (2021). Faults in consumer products are difficult to diagnose, and design is to blame: A user observation study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, 128741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128741
Purkiss, D., Pencheva, P., Munro, B., & Miodownik, M. (2024). A systems approach to growing the UK electronics and appliance repair economy. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5, 1432655. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1432655
Roskladka, N., Jaegler, A., & Miragliotta, G. (2023). From “right to repair” to “willingness to repair”: Exploring consumer’s perspective to product lifecycle extension. Journal of Cleaner Production, 432, 139705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139705
Rudolf, S., Blömeke, S., Niemeyer, J. F., Lawrenz, S., Sharma, P., Hemminghaus, S., Mennenga, M., Schmidt, K., Rausch, A., Spengler, T. S., & Herrmann, C. (2022). Extending the Life Cycle of EEE—Findings from a Repair Study in Germany: Repair Challenges and Recommendations for Action. Sustainability, 14(5), 2993. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052993
Russell, J. D., Svensson‐Hoglund, S., Richter, J. L., Dalhammar, C., & Milios, L. (2023). A matter of timing: System requirements for repair and their temporal dimensions. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 27(3), 845-855. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13280
Sandez, S., Pérez-Belis, V., Juan, P., & Bovea, M. D. (2023). Do users have the ability to self-repair non-complex electrical appliances? Design and development of a self-guided workshop with repair documentation in different formats. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 39, 244-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.05.007
Sonego, M., Echeveste, M. E. S., & Debarba, H. G. (2022). Repair of electronic products: Consumer practices and institutional initiatives. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 556-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.031
Terzioğlu, N. (2021). Repair motivation and barriers model: Investigating user perspectives related to product repair towards a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125644
van den Berge, R., Magnier, L., & Mugge, R. (2023). Sparking the repair “can-co” attitude: Enhancing users’ willingness to repair through design support in fault diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.57698/V17I3.02
Von Gries, N., & Bringezu, S. (2022). Using New Spare Parts for Repair of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment? The Material Footprint of Individual Components. Resources, 11(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11020024
