Redesigning single use to reuse

Identifying opportunities for surgical instrument sets

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10289

Keywords:

Reuse in healtcare, Circular economy, Waste reduction, Surgical instrument sets, Design of reuse context, Willingness to reuse

Abstract

Hospitals have a significant impact on the environment due to their size, energy-intensive processes, consumption of resources and waste generation. A trend of increased reusable products usage and so re-sterilized products is becoming visible. Nevertheless, reusable products have to compete with the added values of single use regarding convenience, effort and costs. Although the concept of reusable sterile surgical instrument sets seems valuable to reduce resource consumption compared to single-use instruments, their use is threatened by multiple inefficiencies. This case study aims to understand why the sterile sets usage is not optimal, what the consequences are for the various departments, what journey they take within the hospital, and how communication occurs regarding these sets. Observations and in-depth interviews were conducted in operation rooms, central sterilization department and the healthcare logistics department of a large sized university hospital. This led to a roadmap of the sterile surgical instrument sets within the hospital through each department involved. Using the roadmap, several critical points are discussed to design optimal reuse contexts in hospitals. In sum, we found that sets are often incomplete due to (i) a lack of turnover time for checking completeness, (ii) difficulty of recognizing specific instruments based on their name, (iii) lack of a good communication system to communicate incompleteness. Additional unwanted waste is created due to (iv) extra sets that are opened as a precaution for missing instruments, (v) unused instruments are thrown away or re-sterilized, (vi) broken sterility due to storage problems, which requires repackaging and re-sterilization.

Author Biography

Kaat Dhondt, University of Antwerp, Belgium

Kaat Dhondt is a PhD researcher in Product Development at the University of Antwerp. Her research focuses on desinging qualitative reuse systems within the medical sector. With previous projects on resetting single use medical devices and reusable packaging for clinical trails, she investigates the role of design engineering in the circular transition in different lines of healthcare.

References

Ahmadi, E., Masel, D. T., Metcalf, A. Y., & Schuller, K. (2019). Inventory management of surgical supplies and sterile instruments in hospitals: A literature review. Health Systems, 8(2), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2018.1496875

Conrardy, J., Hillanbrand, M., Myers, S., & Nussbaum, G. F. (2010). Reducing Medical Waste. AORN Journal, 91(6), 711–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2009.12.029

Efthymiou, C., & Cale, A. (2022). Implications of equipment failure occurring during surgery. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 104(9), 678–684. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2021.0345

Ertz, M., & Patrick, K. (2020). The future of sustainable healthcare: Extending product lifecycles. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104589

FPS Public Health. (2017, May). GOOD PRACTICES VOOR STERILISATIE VAN MEDISCHE HULPMIDDELEN. https://www.health.belgium.be/sites/default/files/uploads/fields/fpshealth_theme_file/170912_good_practices_for_the_sterilisationa5.pdf

Harding, C., Van Loon, J., Moons, I., De Win, G., & Du Bois, E. (2021). Design Opportunities to Reduce Waste in Operating Rooms. Sustainability, 13(4), 2207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042207

Hunfeld, N., Diehl, J. C., Timmermann, M., Van Exter, P., Bouwens, J., Browne-Wilkinson, S., De Planque, N., & Gommers, D. (2023). Circular material flow in the intensive care unit—Environmental effects and identification of hotspots. Intensive Care Medicine, 49(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06940-6

Nast, K., & Swords, K. A. (2019). Decreasing operating room costs via reduction of surgical instruments. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 15(2), 153.e1-153.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.01.013

Pencheon, D. (2009). Health services and climate change: What can be done?

Thomasson, B. G., Fuller, D., Mansour, J., Marburger, R., & Pukenas, E. (2016). Efficacy of surgical safety checklist: Assessing orthopaedic surgical implant readiness. Healthcare, 4(4), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.01.005

Van De Klundert, J., Muls, P., & Schadd, M. (2008). Optimizing sterilization logistics in hospitals. Health Care Management Science, 11(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-007-9037-4

World Health Organisation. (2024, October 24). Healthcare waste. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/health-care-waste

Downloads

Published

24-06-2025

How to Cite

Dhondt, K., Harding, C., Watts, R., De Win, G., & Du Bois, E. (2025). Redesigning single use to reuse: Identifying opportunities for surgical instrument sets. Proceedings of the 6th Product Lifetimes and the Environment Conference (PLATE2025), (6). https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10289

Issue

Section

Track 1: Design for Longer Lasting Products and Buildings – Research Papers