The influence of age, gender and income on Australians’ expectations of clothing lifespan

Authors

  • Alice Payne RMIT University, Australia
  • Xinru Jiang RMIT University, Australia
  • Paige Street RMIT University, Australia
  • Mark Leenders RMIT University, Australia
  • Ninh Nguyen RMIT University, Australia
  • Simon Pervan RMIT University, Australia
  • Caroline Swee Lin Tan RMIT University, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10291

Keywords:

Clothing Longevity, Australia, Consumer Behaviour, Durability, Clothing Lifespan

Abstract

Extending clothing lifespans is a crucial step in advancing the transition to a circular economy. Past studies have highlighted the need to distinguish between social and technical lifespans of clothing (Laitala et al., 2018), as well as how/when to measure lifespan, whether in number of wears or number of years (Klepp et al., 2020). While research has been conducted on clothing lifespans in European contexts (WRAP 2019) and in Europe, Asia and the USA (Laitala & Klepp, 2020), this area remains underexplored in Australia, which presents a unique cultural and economic landscape. This paper investigates the expected lifespans of clothing in Australian households. Factors such as age, gender, and income can significantly impact how long consumers expect their clothing to last. By examining these variables, this research can provide insights into consumer behaviour and preferences, which can inform targeted interventions and educational campaigns to promote sustainable clothing practices.

References

Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the royal statistical society: series B (methodological), 39(1), 1-22.

Klepp, I. G., Laitala, K., & Wiedemann, S. (2020). Clothing lifespans: What should be measured and how. Sustainability, 12(15), 6219. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12156219

Laitala, K., & Klepp, I. G. (2020). What affects garment lifespans? International clothing practices based on a wardrobe survey in China, Germany, Japan, the UK, and the USA. Sustainability, 12(21), 9151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219151

Reckwitz(2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432

Rubin, L. H., Witkiewitz, K., St Andre, J., & Reilly, S. (2007). Methods for handling missing data in the behavioral neurosciences: Don’t throw the baby rat out with the bath water. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 5(2), A71.

Seamless. (2024). Seamless National Clothing Benchmark. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6626f3b6b75e22631bdf7c57/67342188a21a1399698f60f9_Seamless_National_Clothing_Benchmark.pdf

Shove, E., Pantzar, M. Watson, M., & (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. (1 ed.). SAGE Publications, Limited. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250655

WRAP. (2019). Key Findings Report: Consumer Research for ECAP 2016-2019. European Clothing Action Plan. http://www.ecap. eu.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Consumer-Research-for-ECAP.pdf

Downloads

Published

24-06-2025

How to Cite

Payne, A., Jiang, X., Street, P., Leenders, M., Nguyen, N., Pervan, S., & Swee Lin Tan, C. (2025). The influence of age, gender and income on Australians’ expectations of clothing lifespan. Proceedings of the 6th Product Lifetimes and the Environment Conference (PLATE2025), (6). https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10291

Issue

Section

Track 11: Clothing, Footwear, and Accessories – Extended Abstracts