Leveraging social norms for sustainable behaviour
How the exposure to static-and-dynamic-norm communications encourage sustainable behaviour towards reduction of fashion consumption.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10293Keywords:
Social norms; sufficient-based consumption, fashion, sustainable behaviour; over-consumption., Social norms, Sufficient-based consumption, Fashion, Sustainable behaviour, Over-consumptionAbstract
Communication channels from social media to newspapers abound with examples where static norms, reflecting established behaviours (e.g., eating meat, drinking alcohol at parties) are combined with dynamic norms, illustrating emerging societal trends (e.g., adopting more plant-based diets, attending alcohol-free events). Despite widespread exposure to these combined static-and-dynamic-norm communications, their impact on consumer behaviour remains unexplored. Through two lab experiments, this research investigates how static-and-dynamic-norm communications influence sustainable behaviour towards a reduction of fast fashion consumption. Our findings show that consumers exposed to the combination of unsustainable static and unsustainable dynamic norm purchased significantly fewer fashion items compared to other experimental conditions. This effect is driven by social moral cleansing, as consumers, confronted with widespread unsustainable behaviour of others, felt a highlighted motivation to clean and compensate for the normalized bad behaviour of others by behaving more sustainably in return. This research advances the understanding of social normative influences on sustainable consumption and offers valuable insights for researchers, designers and policy makers. By identifying an effective social norm communication to encourage consumption reduction, it lays the groundwork for future research and policy initiatives aimed at promoting sufficiency in the context of sustainable behavioural change.
References
Allaby, M., & Park, C. (2013). A dictionary of environment and conservation. OUP Oxford.
Aratani, L. (2024, 12 July 2024). The new normal’: work from home is here to stay, US data shows. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/money/article/2024/jul/12/working-from-home-data
Attenborough, D. (2020). A life on our planet: My witness statement and a vision for the future. Random House.
Azhar, M., Akhtar, M. J., Rahman, M. N., & Khan, F. A. (2023). Measuring buying intention of generation Z on social networking sites: an application of social commerce adoption model. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-02-2022-0047
Borg, K., Curtis, J., & Lindsay, J. (2020). Social norms and plastic avoidance: Testing the theory of normative social behaviour on an environmental behaviour. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(6), 594-607. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1842
Choi, Y.-H., & Lee, S. (2024). Climate change messages in the fashion industry discussed at COP28. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 32(4), 517-546. DOI: 10.29049/rjcc.2024.32.4.517
Ehrlich, P. R., & Goulder, L. H. (2007). Is current consumption excessive? A general framework and some indications for the United States. Conservation Biology, 21(5), 1145-1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00779.x
Geber, S., & Hefner, D. (2019). Social norms as communicative phenomena: A communication perspective on the theory of normative social behavior. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 8(1), 6-28. DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2019-1-6
Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x
Leong, L.-Y., Hew, T. S., Ooi, K.-B., Hajli, N., & Tan, G. W.-H. (2024). Revisiting the social commerce paradigm: The social commerce (SC) framework and a research agenda. Internet Research, 34(4), 1346-1393. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-08-2022-0657
Loschelder, D. D., Siepelmeyer, H., Fischer, D., & Rubel, J. A. (2019). Dynamic norms drive sustainable consumption: Norm-based nudging helps café customers to avoid disposable to-go-cups. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75, 102146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.02.002
Pristl, A. C., Kilian, S., & Mann, A. (2021). When does a social norm catch the worm? Disentangling social normative influences on sustainable consumption behaviour. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(3), 635-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1890
Rimal, R. N., & Lapinski, M. K. (2015). A re-explication of social norms, ten years later. Communication Theory, 25(4), 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12080
Segalov, M. (2023, 15 January 2023). Last orders: how we fell out of love with alcohol [November 2024]. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jan/15/last-orders-how-we-fell-out-of-love-with-alcohol
Sparkman, G., & Walton, G. M. (2017). Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative. Psychological science, 28(11), 1663-1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719950
Spiller, S. A., Fitzsimons, G. J., Lynch Jr, J. G., & McClelland, G. H. (2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0420
Thomas, C., & Sharp, V. (2013). Understanding the normalisation of recycling behaviour and its implications for other pro-environmental behaviours: A review of social norms and recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 79, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.010
Van Horen, F., van der Wal, A., & Grinstein, A. (2018). Green, greener, greenest: Can competition increase sustainable behavior? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.007
Yamin, P., Fei, M., Lahlou, S., & Levy, S. (2019). Using social norms to change behavior and increase sustainability in the real world: A systematic review of the literature. Sustainability, 11(20), 5847. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205847
Yanovitzky, I., & Rimal, R. N. (2006). Communication and normative influence: An introduction to the special issue. Communication Theory, 16(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00002.x