Behavioural rebound effects and secondary benefits of sustainability-oriented design
Two sides of the same coin?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10302Keywords:
Secondary Benefits, Rebound Effects, Behavioural Mechanisms, Design for SustainabilityAbstract
Despite the growing body of research on the role of rebound effects (RE) in offsetting potential environmental gains, understanding of secondary benefits (SB) remains limited. SB are induced behavioural or systemic changes triggered by sustainability-oriented design that strengthen, rather than offset, potential environmental gains. To address this gap, this study aims to uncover the underlying behavioural mechanisms with the aid of a systematic literature review. A total of 59 relevant articles has been selected, resulting in the identification of 17 behavioural SB mechanisms. The mechanisms are clustered into five categories: identity, consistency, efficacy, goals, and motivation. For each mechanism, a definition, explanatory quote, moderator list, and source overview is provided. Although each mechanism is unique, similarities in mediators and moderators suggest an interconnected rather than isolated nature. An evaluation of the research trends indicates an increased number of examined interventions. Nevertheless, limitations regarding the diversity of interventions, the intention-behaviour gap, and self-report bias remain. After interpreting the results, potential connections between SB and RE mechanisms are addressed. This study concludes with three recommendations for research to develop a comprehensive understanding of SB mechanisms. Ultimately, this understanding could contribute to achieving the full environmental potential of sustainability-oriented design and preventing RE.
References
Andrew, E., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2024). Multidisciplinary perspectives on rebound effects in sustainability: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143366
Arias, C., & Trujillo, C. A. (2020). Perceived consumer effectiveness as a trigger of behavioral spillover effects: A path towards recycling. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114348
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations (Vol. 51, Issue 6). Psychological Association, Inc.
Biolchini, J., Gomes Mian, P., Candida Cruz Natali, A., & Horta Travassos, G. (2005). Systematic Review in Software Engineering.
Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L. E., Nash, N. C., Haggar, P., & Lord, J. (2019). Compensatory and catalysing behavioural beliefs: Development and psychometric properties of an instrument for measuring spillover-related perceptions in seven countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(APR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00963
Carrico, A. R., Raimi, K. T., Truelove, H. B., & Eby, B. (2018). Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: An Experimental Test of Pro-Environmental Spillover From Reducing Meat Consumption to Monetary Donations. Environment and Behavior, 50(7), 723–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517713067
Elf, P., Gatersleben, B., & Christie, I. (2019). Facilitating positive spillover effects: New insights from a mixed-methods approach exploring factors enabling people to live more sustainable lifestyle. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JAN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02699
Exadaktylos, F., & van den Bergh, J. (2021). Energy-related behaviour and rebound when rationality, self-interest and willpower are limited. Nature Energy, 6(12), 1104–1113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00889-4
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
Fanghella, V., d’Adda, G., & Tavoni, M. (2019). On the use of nudges to affect spillovers in environmental behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JAN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00061
Font Vivanco, D., Freire-González, J., Galvin, R., Santarius, T., Walnum, H. J., Makov, T., & Sala, S. (2022). Rebound effect and sustainability science: A review. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(4), 1543–1563. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13295
Frezza, M., Whitmarsh, L., Schäfer, M., & Schrader, U. (2019). Spillover effects of sustainable consumption: combining identity process theory and theories of practice. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, 15(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2019.1567215
Geiger, S. J., Brick, C., Nalborczyk, L., Bosshard, A., & Jostmann, N. B. (2021). More green than gray? Toward a sustainable overview of environmental spillover effects: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101694
Geng, L., Chen, Y., Ye, L., Zhou, K., & Chen, Y. (2019). How to predict future pro-environmental intention? The spillover effect of electricity-saving behavior under environmental and monetary framing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.088
Guzzo, D., Walrave, B., Videira, N., Oliveira, I. C., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2024). Towards a systemic view on rebound effects: Modelling the feedback loops of rebound mechanisms. Ecological Economics, 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108050
Ha, S., & Kwon, S. Y. (2016). Spillover from past recycling to green apparel shopping behavior: the role of environmental concern and anticipated guilt. Fashion and Textiles, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-016-0068-7
Haggar, P., Whitmarsh, L., & Nash, N. (2023). A Drop in the Ocean? Fostering Water-Saving Behavior and Spillover Through Information Provision and Feedback. Environment and Behavior, 55(6–7), 520–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165231201371
Henn, L., Otto, S., & Kaiser, F. G. (2020). Positive spillover: The result of attitude change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101429
Jaich, H., Jastram, S. M., & Blind, K. (2023a). Organizational practices as drivers of societal change: contextual spillover effects of environmental management on employees’ public sphere pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(1), 130–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2021-0478
Jaich, H., Jastram, S. M., & Blind, K. (2023b). Spillover of Social Norms at Work On Employees’ Self-Reported Private Sphere Pro-Environmental Behaviour: A Mixed Method Investigation. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 75(4), 519–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-023-00167-x
Kaida, N., & Kaida, K. (2015). Spillover effect of congestion charging on pro-environmental behavior. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(3), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9550-9
Lacasse, K. (2016). Don’t be satisfied, identify! Strengthening positive spillover by connecting pro-environmental behaviors to an “environmentalist” label. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.006
Lauren, N., Fielding, K. S., Smith, L., & Louis, W. R. (2016). You did, so you can and you will: Self-efficacy as a mediator of spillover from easy to more difficult pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.10.004
Lauren, N., Smith, L. D. G., Louis, W. R., & Dean, A. J. (2019). Promoting Spillover: How Past Behaviors Increase Environmental Intentions by Cueing Self-Perceptions. Environment and Behavior, 51(3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517740408
Lope, C. W., & Weave, R. C. (2021). Understanding impacts of environmental stewardship programs through community geography: Pro-environment behaviors cultivated and reinforced. Electronic Green Journal, 1(45), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5070/G314548511
Maki, A., Carrico, A. R., Raimi, K. T., Truelove, H. B., Araujo, B., & Yeung, K. L. (2019). Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behaviour spillover. Nature Sustainability, 2(4), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0263-9
Mateer, T. J., Melton, T. N., Miller, Z. D., Lawhon, B., Agans, J. P., Lawson, D. F., Brasier, K. J., & Taff, B. D. (2023). The Potential Pro-Environmental Behavior Spillover Effects of Specialization in Environmentally Responsible Outdoor Recreation. Land, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/land12111970
Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral Self-Licensing: When Being Good Frees Us to Be Bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x
Nash, N., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., Hargreaves, T., Poortinga, W., Thomas, G., Sautkina, E., & Xenias, D. (2017). Climate-relevant behavioral spillover and the potential contribution of social practice theory. Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.481
Nash, N., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., Thøgersen, J., Gouveia, V., Araújo, R. C. R., Harder, M. K., Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2019). Reflecting on behavioral spillover in context: How do behavioral motivations and awareness catalyze other environmentally responsible actions in Brazil, China, and Denmark? Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JUN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00788
Nilsson, A., Bergquist, M., & Schultz, W. P. (2017). Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda. Environmental Education Research, 23(4), 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1250148
Peng, X., Fang, P., Lee, S., Song, W., Wang, L., & Zhou, D. (2024). Overcoming double positive spillovers: automatic habits and dual environmental cognitions driving pro-environmental behaviors among hotel customers. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2024.2325011
Penz, E., Hartl, B., & Hofmann, E. (2019). Explaining consumer choice of low carbon footprint goods using the behavioral spillover effect in German-speaking countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.270
Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., & Suffolk, C. (2013). The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in Wales: Attitude change and behavioural spillover effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.001
Puntiroli, M., Moussaoui, L. S., & Bezençon, V. (2022). Are consumers consistent in their sustainable behaviours? A longitudinal study on consistency and spillover. Journal of Business Research, 144, 322–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.075
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
Santarius, T., & Soland, M. (2016). Towards a psychological theory and comprehensive rebound typology. In Rethinking Climate and Energy Policies: New Perspectives on the Rebound Phenomenon. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38807-6_7
Santarius, T., Walnum, H. J., & Aall, C. (2018). From unidisciplinary to multidisciplinary rebound research: Lessons learned for comprehensive climate and energy policies. In Frontiers in Energy Research (Vol. 6, Issue NOV). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00104
Sheeran, P., & Webb, T. L. (2016). The Intention–Behavior Gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12265
Sintov, N., Geislar, S., & White, L. V. (2019). Cognitive Accessibility as a New Factor in Proenvironmental Spillover: Results From a Field Study of Household Food Waste Management. Environment and Behavior, 51(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517735638
Sorrell, S., Gatersleben, B., & Druckman, A. (2020). The limits of energy sufficiency: A review of the evidence for rebound effects and negative spillovers from behavioural change. Energy Research and Social Science, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101439
Spaccatini, F., Riva, P., Richetin, J., Porcelli, E., Pancani, L., Capellini, R., & Sacchi, S. (2023). From past to present (for a better future): The moderating role of cognitive mindset on spillover effects in environmental behaviors. Current Psychology, 42(18), 15858–15873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02917-2
Sparkman, G., Attari, S. Z., & Weber, E. U. (2021). Moderating spillover: Focusing on personal sustainable behavior rarely hinders and can boost climate policy support. Energy Research and Social Science, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102150
Steinhorst, J., Klöckner, C. A., & Matthies, E. (2015). Saving electricity - For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing. In Journal of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 125–135). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.012
Steinhorst, J., & Matthies, E. (2016). Monetary or environmental appeals for saving electricity? -Potentials for spillover on low carbon policy acceptability. Energy Policy, 93, 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.020
Suárez-Varela, M., & Dinar, A. (2020). The role of curtailment versus efficiency on spillovers among pro-environmental behaviors: Evidence from two towns in Granada, Spain. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030769
Thøgersen, J., & Crompton, T. (2009). Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-009-9101-1
Thøgersen, J. (1999). Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern. In Journal of Economic Psychology (Vol. 20).
Tiefenbeck, V., Staake, T., Roth, K., & Sachs, O. (2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy, 57, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.021
Truelove, H. B., Carrico, A. R., Weber, E. U., Raimi, K. T., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004
Truelove, H. B., & Nugent, M. R. (2020). Straw wars: Pro-environmental spillover following a guilt appeal. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101521
Van de Mortel, T. F. (2008). Faking it: Social desirability response bias in selfreport research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(4), 40–48.
Van der Loo, I.G.H, & Pigosso D.C.A. (2024). Explaining the rebound effects of sustainable design: a behavioural perspective. Proceedings of the Design Society, 4, 1497-1506. doi:10.1017/pds.2024.152
Van Der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2018). Spillover benefits: Emphasizing different benefits of environmental behavior and its effects on spillover. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02347
Verfuerth, C., Jones, C. R., Gregory-Smith, D., & Oates, C. (2019). Understanding contextual spillover: Using identity process theory as a lens for analyzing behavioral responses to a workplace dietary choice intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(MAR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00345
Wang, J., Yang, X., Bailey, A., & Wang, J. (2021). Positive spillover of consumers’ sustainable behaviors: The mediating role of self-determination need satisfaction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128436
Wang, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, R., Ma, H., Hu, A., Wu, J., Yu, B., & Fan, S. (2024). Exploring the potential impact of household photovoltaic systems on low-carbon production behavior in rural areas: unveiling the pro-environmental spillover effect. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1297575
Wolstenholme, E., Poortinga, W., & Whitmarsh, L. (2020). Two Birds, One Stone: The Effectiveness of Health and Environmental Messages to Reduce Meat Consumption and Encourage Pro-environmental Behavioral Spillover. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577111
Xu, L., Zhang, X., & Ling, M. (2018a). Pro-environmental spillover under environmental appeals and monetary incentives: Evidence from an intervention study on household waste separation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 60, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.10.003
Xu, L., Zhang, X., & Ling, M. (2018b). Spillover effects of household waste separation policy on electricity consumption: Evidence from Hangzhou, China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.028
Yang, S., Cheng, P., Wang, S., & Li, J. (2021). Towards sustainable cities: The spillover effects of waste‐sorting policies on sustainable consumption. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010975
Yang, S., Wei, J., & Cheng, P. (2021). Spillover of different regulatory policies for waste sorting: Potential influence on energy-saving policy acceptability. Waste Management, 125, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.008
Ye, J., Yao, Y., & Li, L. (2022). The more involved, the more willing to participate: An analysis of the internal mechanism of positive spillover effects of pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133959
Zhang, S., Ren, S., & Tang, G. (2024). From Passive to Active: The Positive Spillover of Required Employee Green Behavior on Green Advocacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 192(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05494-x
Zhao, B., & Huangfu, X. (2023). The More Training, the More Willingness? A Positive Spillover Effect Analysis of Voluntary Behavior in Environmental Protection. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310069
Zhou, J., Liu, Q., Mao, R., & Yu, X. (2017). Habit spillovers or induced awareness: Willingness to pay for eco-labels of rice in China. Food Policy, 71, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.07.006
