Guilty (or invisible) materiality in everyday object relations?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10324Keywords:
Material relations, Materiality, Everyday life studies, Stuff, Sustainable consumptionAbstract
In today’s context, demanding radical change even on the scale of our daily behaviour, this article builds on research into guilty materiality to better understand obstacles to changing our everyday material relations. “Guilty materiality“ refers to why materiality and material relations may be stigmatised, invisibilised, ignored and avoided.
Daily material relations self-documented by 82 university-level design students provide the tangible basis for exploring and highlighting obstacles and ambiguities in daily-life artefact relations and their materiality. Our study focuses only on what is touched by the cohort, constituting a limited number of artefact encounters. The main analysed material is individual maps produced by students visualising their daily consumption habits.
While the long-term aim of this research is to help identifying leverage points and action areas related to current practices and also mindsets, this paper also presents and explores the pertinence of the proposed methodology in this context. This research discusses, refines and adds to an existing list of triggers/influencing mechanisms that may act as obstacles to more environmentally-relevant everyday material relations.
References
Baker, S. (1995) To go about noisily: clutter; writing and design, in Emigre No35, Summer
Baudrillard, J. (1970) La Société de Consommation, Editions Denoel, Folio Essais, Paris
Binswanger, M. (2006) Why does income growth fail to make us happier? Searching for the treadmills behind the paradox of happiness. The Journal of Socio-Economics 35, pp366 - 381 DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.040
Burlot, D, (2024) Materials, materialities, making. Histoire de l’art, no. 93: Materials, materialities, making. In: ArtHist.net, Apr 28, 2023 (accessed Dec 8, 2024), <https://arthist.net/archive/39180>.
Dona, C. (1988) Invisible Design, in Design After Modernism, ed; Thackara, p152 - 159
Fromm, E (1976) To Have or To Be, 2013, Bloomsbury Academic, London
Green, C. & Treilhou, S. (2020) Guilty Materiality. why we play down material relations. In DC (S) Design Culture(s), Cumulus Roma, June 16 - 19, Roma, 2020 (2021)
Heidegger, M. Being and Time, (1927) trad. Macquarrie & Robinson, Blackwell, Oxford, 1962 (Sein und Zeit)
Hodder, I. (2014) The Entanglements of Humans and Things: A Long-Term View, New Literary History, Volume 45, Number 1, Winter 2014, pp. 19-36 DOI: 10.1353/nlh.2014.0005
Kuijer, L. (2014) Implications of Social Practice Theory for Sustainable Design, doctoral thesis, TU Delft, NL.
Lee J. (2014) The True Benefits of Designing Design Methods. Artifact, Volume III, Issue 2 DOI: 10.14434/artifact.v3i2.3951
Life at Home in the 21st Century, UCLA research, 2001 - 2005, commented on in newsroom.ucla.edu/magazine/center-everyday-lives-families-suburban-america (accessed Dec 8, 2024)
Markosian, N. (2015) The Right Stuff, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (4):665-687 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2014.999001
Miller, D. (2008) The Comfort of Things, Polity Press, Cambridge
Miller, D. (2010) Stuff, Polity Press, Cambridge
Rinkinen, J., Jalas, M. & Shove, E. (2015) Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life, in Sociology 1-16 - Special Issue on Sociologies of Everyday Life
Ripoll, T. (2023) Pourquoi je prends ma douche trois minutes de trop?, Editions Sciences Humaines, Auxerre, France)
Rosenberger, R., & Verbeek, P. P. C. C. (2015). A field guide to postphenomenology. In R. Rosenberger, & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds.), Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations (pp. 9-41). (Postphenomenology and the Philosophy of Technology). Lexington Books.Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations, Lexington, p.9-41
Schouwenberg, L. & Kaethler, M. Eds.(2021) The Auto-Ethnographic Turn in Design, Valiz, Amsterdam
Verbeek P-P, & Kockelkoren P, (1998), The Things That Matter, in Design Issues, Vol 14. Number 3, Autumn
Walker, S. (2017) The object of nightingales: design values for a meaningful material culture, in the Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Product Design, ed. Chapman, p53 - 68, Routledge, UK
Zucotti P. (2015) Every Thing We Touch: A 24-Hour Inventory of Our Lives, Viking, UK DOI: 10.2752/175470812X13281948975459
