Does the EU Eco-design for Sustainable Product Regulation Address Premature Obsolescence?
A Systemic Perspective on Barriers to Longer Product Lifetime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10336Keywords:
Premature obsolescence, Long product lifetime, Eco-design for Sustainable Product Regulation (ESPR)Abstract
Premature obsolescence has significant environmental and socioeconomic impacts. Extending the lifetime of products is a key aim of the Eco-design for Sustainable Product Regulation (ESPR), recently introduced by the European Commission. Several barriers to achieving longer product lifetime have been identified in the literature. By examining the systemic interplay among these barriers and forms of premature obsolescence, we develop a framework to analyse the potential effectiveness of ESPR. Our findings reveal that these barriers are interconnected and mutually reinforcing, confirming the need for public policies that address these interactions and reduce premature obsolescence. Moreover, while the ESPR successfully addresses technical and economic challenges related to product lifetime extension, it remains limited in tackling symbolic obsolescence and ingrained societal consumption patterns.
References
Bartolini, S. and Sarracino, F., (2021). Happier and Sustainable. Possibilities for a post-growth society. MPRA Paper No. 108309. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/108309/
Becher, S. I., & Sibony, A. L. (2021). Confronting product obsolescence. Colum. J. Eur. L., 27, 97.
Bernays, E. (1928). Propaganda. Brooklyn: Ig Publishing, (2005), 37.
Bisschop, L., Hendlin, Y., & Jaspers, J. (2022). Designed to break: planned obsolescence as corporate environmental crime. Crime, Law and Social Change, 78(3), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10023-4
Burns, B., (2010). Re-evaluating obsolescence and planning for it. In: Cooper, T. (Ed.), Longer Lasting Products - Alternatives to the Throwaway Society. Gower Publishing Limited, Farnham, England, pp. 39–60.
Bundgaard, A. M., Huulgaard, R. D., & Remmen, A. (2024). Getting the Priorities Right in Material Efficiency: From the Ecodesign Directive to the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation. International Conference Electronics Goes Green 2024+: From Silicon to Sustainability, EGG 2024 - Proceedings, Berlin. DOI: 10.23919/EGG62010.2024.10631182
Butt, T. E., Camilleri, M., Paul, P., & Jones, K. G. (2015). Obsolescence types and the built environment - Definitions and implications. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2015.066896
Cooper, T. (2004). Inadequate life? Evidence of consumer attitudes to product obsolescence. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27(4), 421-449. DOI: 10.1007/s10603-004-2284-6
Cooper, T. (2010). Longer lasting products. Alternatives to the Throwaway Society. Farnham/Surrey: Gower. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315592930
Dalhammar, C., Maitre-Ekern, E., Richter, J. L., Svensson-Hoglund, S., & Milios, L. (2023). 7. Regulation with a lasting impact? Policies for product durability. Labor and Organization Volume 10, 159. DOI: 10.1515/9783839463963-008
European Commission. (2024). Regulation - EU - 2024/1781 - EN - EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R1781&qid=1719580391746
Fabšíková, T. (2024). Legal Regulation Related to Products in the Context of the European Union’s Climate Objectives[PRÁVNÍ REGULACE SOUVISEJÍCÍ S VÝROBKY V KONTEXTU CÍLŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE V OBLASTI OCHRANY KLIMATU]. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica, 70(1), 63–75.https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.5
Friedel, R. (2013). Obsolescence: Origins and Outrages. Technology and Culture, 54(1), 167–169. https://doi.org/10.1353/TECH.2013.0014
Galatola, M. (2024). Circular economy and product sustainability in Europe. In Cyclic Economy: Policies in Major Countries and the EU (pp. 21–35). De Gruyter.https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110767179-002
Götz, T., Berg, H., Jansen, M., Adisorn, T., Cembrero, D., Markkanen, S., & Chowdhury, T. (2022). Digital product passport : the ticket to achieving a climate neutral and circular European economy? https://epub.wupperinst.org/frontdoor/index/index/docId/8049
Guillard, V., Le Nagard, E., & de Campos Ribeiro, G. (2023). A typology of consumers regarding perceived obsolescence: The paradox of eco-conscious consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137202. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137202
Guiltinan, J. (2009). Creative destruction and destructive creations: Environmental ethics and planned obsolescence. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(SUPPL. 1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9907-9
Jensen, P. B., Laursen, L. N., & Haase, L. M. (2021). Barriers to product longevity: A review of business, product development and user perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127951
Kagawa, S., Tasaki, T., & Moriguchi, Y. (2006). The environmental and economic consequences of product lifetime extension: Empirical analysis for automobile use. Ecological Economics, 58(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.06.003
Keeble, D. (2013). The culture of planned obsolescence in technology companies.
Lilley, D., Smalley, G., Bridgens, B., Wilson, G. T., & Balasundaram, K. (2016). Cosmetic obsolescence? User perceptions of new and artificially aged materials. Materials & Design, 101, 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.012
Lövdahl, J., Hallstedt, S. I., & Schulte, J. (2023). IMPLICATIONS OF EU INSTRUMENTS ON COMPANY CAPABILITIES TO DESIGN MORE SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS–PRODUCT ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT AND DIGITAL PRODUCT PASSPORT. Proceedings of the Design Society, 3, 2245–2254. https://doi.org/10.1017/PDS.2023.225
Ma, S. (2021). Technological Obsolescence. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3964128
Magnier, L., and Mugge, R. (2022) Are short product lifetimes ineluctable? An exploration of consumers’ perceptions of lifetime extension strategies, in Lockton, D., Lenzi, S., Hekkert, P., Oak, A., Sádaba, J., Lloyd, P. (eds.), DRS2022: Bilbao, 25 June - 3 July, Bilbao, Spain. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.507
Matutinović, I. (2007). An Institutional Approach to Sustainability: a Historical Interplay of Worldviews, Institutions and Technology. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol XLI, No.4, 1109-1137. DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2007.11507089
Maycroft, N. (2009). Consumption, planned obsolescence and waste.
McLaren, A., & McLauchlan, S. (2015). Crafting sustainable repairs: practice-based approaches to extending the life of clothes.
Mellal, M. A. (2020). Obsolescence–A review of the literature. Technology in Society, 63, 101347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101347
Monserand, A. (2022). Buying into inequality: a macroeconomic analysis linking accelerated obsolescence, interpersonal inequality, and potential for degrowth. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Vol. 19 No. 1, 119–137 DOI: 10.4337/ejeep.2022.01.09
Moonitz, M. (1943). The Risk of Obsolescence and the Importance of the Rate of Interest on JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1826804?seq=2
Pandelaere, M., (2016). Materialism and well-being: the role of consumption. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 10, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.027
Richins, M.L., Dawson, S., (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: scale development and validation. J. Consum. Res. 19 (3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1086/209304
Rivera, J. L., & Lallmahomed, A. (2016). Environmental implications of planned obsolescence and product lifetime: a literature review. In International Journal of Sustainable Engineering (Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 119–129). Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2015.1099757
Schuberth, J., Ebert, T., Schlegel, M. C., Rödig, L., Jepsen, D., Memelink, R., & Hauschke, F. (2024). The Front-Runner Approach—Facilitating Progressive Product Policy by Using Information from EU Product Databases. Energies, 17(2), 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17020504
Shi, T., Huang, R., & Sarigöllü, E. (2022). Consumer product use behavior throughout the product lifespan: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of environmental management, 302, 114114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114114
Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666980
Sterling, P. (2016). Why We Consume: Neural Design and Sustainability. Great Transition Initiative (February).http://www.greattransition.org/publication/why-we-consume
Van den Berge, R., Magnier, L., & Mugge, R. (2023). Until death do us part? In‐depth insights into Dutch consumers’ considerations about product lifetimes and lifetime extension. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 27(3), 908-922. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13372
Yang, D., & Vezzoli, C. (2024). Designing Environmentally Sustainable Furniture Products: Furniture-Specific Life Cycle Design Guidelines and a Toolkit to Promote Environmental Performance. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(7), 2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072628
