Designing products that facilitate easy and intuitive repair, an implementation in product design education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10356Keywords:
Repair, Product design, Design education, Industry 5.0Abstract
When considering circular economy, reuse, refurbish and repair of products is key in many circular business models. Both efficient and intuitive disassembly and assembly are crucial facilitators for these strategies, impacting feasibility, cost and economic viability. Thus, product designers and product design educations should focus on how to design products for easy and intuitive disassembly and reassembly to facilitate repairability. The focus from design educations on these specific processes is however very limited. This paper elaborates on the outcomes of a project-based learning course for design engineering students. The students redesigned an electric device (power tool or household appliance) with special attention to design for repairability strategies. Necessary frameworks and tools were offered to first analyze the disassembly and assembly process of the product and secondly redesign for repair. Unlike many other methods that are about assessing assembly and disassembly processes in terms of the time needed to perform them, here special attention was paid to the interactions, both cognitive and physical, during repair. This premise aligns better with the context of end-user repair where time is less relevant but where interactions need to be easier and more intuitive. Through case studies, it was investigated whether this focus generated valuable results and was feasible to implement. The paper is especially relevant for those concerned with circular product design, the assembly and disassembly of products linked to circular strategies such as repair and the integration within design engineering curricula.
References
Bocken, N. M. , P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
Boks, C. B., Kroll, E., Brouwers, W. C. J., & Stevels, A. L. N. (1996). Disassembly modeling: two applications to a Philips 21″ television set. Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics & the Environment. ISEE-1996, 224 – 229. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0029717360&partnerID=40&md5=d9d348e2c0ff9571f72e00aca76f102b
Brosens, L., De Vos, E., & Emmanouil, M. (2022). Critique : a workshop to establish shared understanding and clear responsibilities between design students and their lecturers. In E. Bohemia, L. Buck, & H. Grierson (Eds.), DS 117 : proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022). https://doi.org/10.35199/EPDE.2022.29
De Fazio, F., Bakker, C., Flipsen, B., & Balkenende, R. (2021). The Disassembly Map: A new method to enhance design for product repairability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128552
Desai, A., & Mital, A. (2003). Evaluation of disassemblability to enable design for disassembly in mass production. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 32(4), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(03)00067-2
French Government. (2021). Indice de réparabilité. https://www.indicereparabilite.fr/
Krippendorff, K., & Butter, R. (1984). Product Semantics : Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form. Innovation, 3(2), 4–9.
Kroll, E., & Carver, B. S. (1999). Disassembly analysis through time estimation and other metrics. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 15(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5845(99)00026-5
Lilley, D., & Lofthouse, V. (2009). Sustainable design education – considering design for behavioural change. Engineering Education, 4(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.11120/ened.2009.04010029
Milton, A., & Rodgers, P. (2013). Research Methods for Product Design (G. Sermon, Ed.). Laurence King Publishing Ltd.
Muffatto, M., & Roveda, M. (2002). Product architecture and platforms: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2002.003040
Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic books New York.
Parmentier, D. D., Van Acker, B. B., Detand, J., & Saldien, J. (2020). Design for assembly meaning : a framework for designers to design products that support operator cognition during the assembly process. Cognition, Technology & Work, 22, 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00588-x
Parmentier, D. D., Van Acker, B. B., Detand, J., & Saldien, J. (2021). Framework to Redesign Products with focus on Design For Assembly Meaning: a PBL Case Study. International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(1), 2–18.
Ramirez, M. (2006). Sustainability in the education of industrial designers: the case for Australia. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370610655959
Ritthoff, M., Müller, A., Hopfensack, L., Brüning, R., Wolf, J., & Piehl, F. (2023). Methods and standards for assessing the repairability of electrical and electronic devices.
Rodríguez, N. B., & Favi, C. (2024). Disassembly and Repairability of Mechatronic Products: Insight for Engineering Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 146(2). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064075
Rodríguez, N. B., Gabriel, C., Gaha, R., & Favi, C. (2023). Analysis of disassembly parameters in repairability scores: limitations for engineering design and suggestions for improvement. Procedia CIRP, 116, 738–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.124
Sodhi, R., Sonnenberg, M., & Das, S. (2004). Evaluating the unfastening effort in design for disassembly and serviceability. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954482031000150152
Terzioğlu, N., & Wever, R. (2021). Integrating Repair into Product Design Education: Insights on Repair, Design and Sustainability. Sustainability, 13(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810067
Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24(3), 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3
Vanegas, P., Peeters, J. R., Cattrysse, D., Duflou, J. R., Tecchio, P., Mathieux, F., & Ardente, F. (2016). Study for a method to assess the ease of disassembly of electrical and electronic equipment - Method development and application in a flat panel display case study. doi:10.2788/130925
You, H., & Chen, K. (2007). Applications of affordance and semantics in product design. Design Studies, 28(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.07.002
Zandin, K. B. (2002). MOST work measurement systems. CRC press.
