Wearing and sharing #wardrobechallenges
Finding inspiration when you have nothing to wear
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10358Keywords:
#wardrobechallenge, Wardrobe work, Sustainable behaviour change, User-generated content, Fashion communicationAbstract
Since the emergence of the fashion blogosphere, sharing personal fashion choices and inspirations using hashtags such as #OOTD (outfit of the day) have become commonplace. The speed and volume of this content has grown exponentially, providing a mediated view of self-fashioning as well as a common trope of marketing communications adopted by influencers. Recently, there has been a noted change in wardrobe activities being shared on social media, that focus on the challenges fashion users have as they navigate their existing wardrobe. User-generated content (UGC) tagged with #wardrobechallenge draws together diverse posts ranging from how to re-wear wardrobe items through techniques such as the 30 wears challenge, struggles with closet decluttering and laundry tips. This type of wardrobe work is predominantly an activity undertaken in private; however, when shared and mediated through digital channels it offers greater visibility on the use phase of garments.
Recognising that the use-stage holds much potential to extend the lifecycle of garments (Gwilt & Rissanen, 2012), this paper explores UGC to understand whether the sharing of wardrobe challenges holds potential to drive sustainable behaviour change. With many fashion users mistrustful or confused by what fashion brands say regarding sustainability and little evidence of industry engagement with the post-purchase phases of fashion – the study asks if #wardrobechallenge content offers an effective way of communicating sustainable fashion practices. This is a socio-material investigation, that draws on data from Instagram and TikTok tagged with #wardrobechallenge. A typology of wardrobe challenge practices has been developed; its classifications offer inspiration for ‘doing’ fashion beyond consumption and designations of the fashion industry. The study concludes by discussing how this form of UGC could build new ways of socialising and supporting sustainable behaviour change.
References
Bollier, D. (2014). The commons as a template for transformation. Great Transition Initiative, p.1-14.
Butler-Kisber, L. and Poldman, T. (2010). ‘View of the power of visual approaches in qualitative inquiry: The use of collage making and concept mapping in experiential research’, Journal of Research Practice, vol 6, no.2.
Chapman, J. (2021). Meaningful stuff: design that lasts. Mass, The Mit Press.
Chapman, J. (2012). Emotionally durable design: objects, experiences and empathy. Oxon: Routledge.
Clarke, A. E. (2014). Grounded theory: Critiques, debates, and situational analysis. In A. E. Clarke & K. Charmaz (Eds.), Grounded theory and situational analysis. Volume I. History, essentials and debates in grounded theory, p. 225-251. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cosgrove, D. (1999). ‘Introduction: Mapping meaning’, in D. Cosgrove (ed.), Mappings, London: Reaktion, p. 1–3.
Fletcher, K. (2013). Craft of Use: Post-growth Fashion, Oxon: Routledge.
Fletcher, K., & Klepp, I. G. (Eds.). (2017). Opening up the wardrobe: A methods book. Novus press.
Gwilt, A., & Rissanen, T. (2012). Shaping Sustainable Fashion. Oxon: Routledge.
Hepp, A. (2016). Pioneer communities: collective actors in deep mediatisation. Media, Culture & Society, 38(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716664484
Hipfl, B. (2018). Affect in Media and Communication Studies: Potentials and Assemblages. Media and Communication, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i3.1470
Kwon, K. (2018). Public Referral, Viral Campaign, and Celebrity Participation: A Social Network Analysis of the Ice Bucket Challenge on YouTube. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1561342
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin‐Woodhead, A. (2022). Making wardrobe space: The sustainable potential of minimalist‐inspired fashion challenges. Area, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12848
Payne, A., & Ferrero-Regis, T., (2019) Sustainable fashion in Australia: Raw fibre, fast fashion, and new localism. In Gwilt, A, Payne, A, & Ruthschilling, E A (Eds.) Global Perspectives on Sustainable Fashion. Bloomsbury Visual Arts, UK, p. 180-190.
Oh, T. T., & Pham, M. T. (2021). A Liberating-Engagement Theory of Consumer Fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab051
Orlikowski, W. (2007). ‘Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work’, Organization Studies, vol. 28, no. 9, p. 1435–1448.
Orlikowski, W., & Scott, S.V. (2016). Digital work: A research agenda. A research agenda for management and organization studies, p.88-95.
Ritch, E., Carey, L.D. and Kidd, E. (2020). The fashion detox challenge: An experiment in reduced clothing consumption. In Global Fashion Conference: The Legacy of Fashion: Past, Present and Future.
Rocamora, A. (2023). Deep Mediatisation and the Datafication of Fashion. In Contemporary Challenges in Mediatisation Research p. 63-79. Oxon: Routledge.
Ruppert-Stroescu, M., LeHew, M. L. A., Connell, K. Y. H., & Armstrong, C. M. (2015). Creativity and Sustainable Fashion Apparel Consumption: The Fashion Detox. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X15579990
Saunders, C., Griffin, I., Hackney, F., Barbieri, A., Hill, K. J., West, J., & Willett, J. (2024). A Social Practices Approach to Encourage Sustainable Clothing Choices. Sustainability, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031282
Sumner, M. (2018). Mind the gap: Fashion consumers’ intentions and behaviours. In Eco-Friendly and Fair p. 27-35. Oxon: Routledge.
Tham, M. (2010). Languaging fashion and sustainability: Towards synergistic modes of thinking, wording, visualising and doing fashion and sustainability. Nordic Textile Journal, 3(1), p.14-23.
Vladimirova, K. (2021). Consumption corridors in fashion: deliberations on upper consumption limits in minimalist fashion challenges. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), p. 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1891673
Von Busch, O. (2022). ‘“What is to be sustained?”: Perpetuating systemic injustices through sustainable fashion’, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 400–409.
Woodward, S. (2014). Accidentally Sustainable? Ethnographic approaches to clothing practices. In Routledge handbook of sustainability and fashion p. 131-138. Oxon: Routledge.
