No Product is an Island
The Case of Incontinence Pads in a Nursing Home
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10359Keywords:
Relationality, Incontinence pads, Care, Durability, PracticesAbstract
This paper critically examines product durability through an ethnographic study of incontinence pad usage in a Danish municipal nursing home. By focusing on incontinence pads—which are referred to as “diapers” in this setting—we demonstrate that their durability cannot be understood in isolation from their surrounding environment. Instead, diapers attract auxiliary products, which, when integrated into the care practices of the nursing home, take part in enacting the diapers’ durability in distinct ways. We conceptualize these enactments as either supporting or challenging the durability of the diapers. Combining this ethnographic work with design theorist Arturo Escobar’s interweaving of ontological relationality and design theory, we argue that durability should not be viewed as an inherent property of an object or as determined solely by its human users. Instead, we propose understanding durability as a relational effect that emerges from situated sociomaterial practices. This analytical move challenges modernist assumptions that separate subjects from objects and offers a more nuanced framework for analyzing product durability. Future research on product durability would benefit from adopting this relational approach, as it opens—we hope to show—new ways of thinking and designing with sociomaterial practices and for product durability.
References
Cooper, T. (Ed.). (2010). Longer lasting products: Alternatives to the throwaway society. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
Escobar, A., Osterweil, M., & Sharma, K. (2024). Relationality: An emergent politics of life beyond the human. Bloomsbury Visual Arts. DOI: 10.5040/9781350226005
Fletcher, K. (2012). Durability, fashion, sustainability: The processes and practices of use. Fashion Practice, 4(2), 221–238. DOI: 10.2752/175693812X13403765252389
Jensen, P. B., Laursen, L. N., & Haase, L. M. (2021). Barriers to product longevity: A review of business, product development and user perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127951.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Law, J., & Lin, W. Y. (2020). Care-ful research: Sensibilities from STS. Heterogeneities, 1–16.
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384151
Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927076
Mol, A. (2021). Eating in theory. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478012924
Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (Eds.). (2010). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. transcript Verlag.
Müller, F. (2021). Design ethnography: Epistemology and methodology. Springer Nature.
Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349875
Oudshoorn, N. E., Brouns, M. L. M., & van Oost, E. C. (2005). Diversity and distributed agency in the design and use of medical video-communication technologies. In H. Harbers (Ed.), Inside the politics of technology. Agency and normativity in the co-production of technology and society (pp. 85–105). Amsterdam University Press.
Pickering, A. (2022). Acting with the world: Doing without science. e-cadernos CES, (38), 155–165.
Pols, J. (2023). Reinventing the good life: An empirical contribution to the philosophy of care. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781800086029
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
Suchman, L. (2002). Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems: 14(2), 91–105.
Tonkinwise, C. (2023). Some theories of change behind and within transition designing. In D. Drabble, A. de Götzen, N. Morelli, & L. Simeone (Eds.), Strategic thinking, design and the theory of change (pp. 270–293). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803927718.00027
