From excess to essential
Exploring the Potential of Adopting Smaller Wardrobes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10360Keywords:
Wardrobe study, Wardrobe size, Wardrobe reduction, Sustainable fashion, SufficiencyAbstract
The overproduction and overconsumption of clothing have substantial environmental impacts. Shifting to smaller wardrobes containing fewer, durable, and frequently used garments is a key strategy in transitioning to a sustainable system. Understanding the size and composition of wardrobes is an essential first step to assess the potential of adopting smaller wardrobes. This study maps the current size of individuals’ wardrobes, the fraction actively used, and the fraction individuals deemed essential to meet their needs. It moreover investigates the characteristics of essential garments and identifies barriers to adopting an essential wardrobe. To examine this, participants' wardrobes were first audited and then reduced to only those items deemed essential to meet their needs for the coming year. The wardrobe audit of 30 individuals in Flanders (Belgium) reveals that participants owned, on average, 169 garments, of which 138 were used in the past year (81%), and 90 were considered essential (53%). Participants’ perceived essential clothing needs varied strongly, ranging from 36 to 275 garments, or alternatively, 28% to 98% of their current wardrobe. Combinability emerged as the most important criterion for selecting essential garments. Both practical (i.e., shortages) and emotional considerations (i.e., loss of joy) were anticipated as obstacles to adopting an essential wardrobe. This study highlights the considerable variation in how individuals meet their clothing needs and what they deem essential. Our findings provide an initial range for the minimum number of garments required to meet clothing needs and offer valuable insights for establishing sufficiency thresholds in apparel consumption.
References
Bardey, A., Booth, M., Heger, G., & Larsson, J. (2022). Finding yourself in your wardrobe: An exploratory study of lived experiences with a capsule wardrobe. International Journal of Market Research, 64(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785321993743
Corona, B., Shen, L., Reike, D., Rosales Carreón, J., & Worrell, E. (2019). Towards sustainable development through the circular economy – A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 151, 104498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498
Coscieme, L., Akenji, L., Latva-Hakuni, E., Vladimirova, K. , N. K. , H. C. , J.-M. C., Nielsen, K., Iran, S., & D´Itria, E. (2022). Unfit, Unfair, Unfashionable: Resizing Fashion for a Fair Consumption Space. Hot or Cool Institute.
de Wagenaar, D., Galama, J., & Sijtsema, S. J. (2022). Exploring Worldwide Wardrobes to Support Reuse in Consumers’ Clothing Systems. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010487
Maguire, H., & Fahy, F. (2023). Unlocking insights in the everyday: Exploring practices to foster sustainable maximum use of clothing. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100095
Maldini, I., Duncker, L., Bregman, L., Piltz, G., Duscha, L., Cunningham, G., Vooges, M., Grevinga, T., Tap, R., & van Balgooi, F. (2017). Measuring the Dutch Clothing Mountain. Amsterdam: Publishing Lab. http://www.hva.nl/bibliotheek/contact/contactformulier/contact.html,
Maldini, I., Haugrønning, V., & De León, L. (2023). Studying clothing consumption volumes through wardrobe studies: a methodological reflection. Procedia PLATE – Product Lifetimes And The Environment. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/122687
Martindale, A., & Lee, Y. A. (2019). Students’ perceptions of adopting minimal transformable wardrobes. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2018.1477998
Martin-Woodhead, A. (2023). Making wardrobe space: The sustainable potential of minimalist-inspired fashion challenges. Area, 55(2), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12848
Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T., & Gwilt, A. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9
Piontek, F. M., Rapaport, M., & Müller, M. (2019). One year of Clothing Consumption of a German Female Consumer. Procedia CIRP, 80, 417–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.01.055
Polizzi di Sorrentino, E., Woelbert, E., & Sala, S. (2016). Consumers and their behavior: state of the art in behavioral science supporting use phase modeling in LCA and ecodesign. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-1016-2
Rhee, J., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2019). ‘The wardrobe diet’: teaching sustainable consumption through experience with undergraduates in the USA. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2019.1590864
Roos, S., Sandin, G., Zamani, B., Peters, G., & Svanström, M. (2017). Will Clothing Be Sustainable? Clarifying Sustainable Fashion (pp. 1–45). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2182-4_1
Ruppert-Stroescu, M., LeHew, M. L. A., Connell, K. Y. H., & Armstrong, C. M. (2015). Creativity and Sustainable Fashion Apparel Consumption: The Fashion Detox. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 33(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X15579990
Štefko, R., & Steffek, V. (2018). Key issues in Slow Fashion: Current challenges and future perspectives. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072270
Vermeyen, V., Alaerts, L., Worrell, E., Van Acker, K., & Germeys, F. (2025). Behind Closed Doors: Examining the Stock of Clothing in Individuals’ Wardrobes. Journal of Circular Economy, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.55845/OQEE5977
Vladimirova, K. (2021). Consumption corridors in fashion: deliberations on upper consumption limits in minimalist fashion challenges. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, 17(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1891673
WRAP. (2022). Citizen Insights: Clothing Longevity and Circular Business Models receptivity in the UK. November 2021.
Wu, D. E., Thomas, J. B., Moore, M., & Carroll, K. (2013). Voluntary simplicity: The Great American Apparel Diet. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17(3), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-05-2012-0020
