Convenience as a Key Driver in Extending the Cumulative Lifespan of Furniture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10363Keywords:
Furniture, Product Longevity, Emotional Attachment, Value, ConvenienceAbstract
In response to environmental challenges and overconsumption, design strategies focusing on product longevity have emerged. While product longevity is partly determined by physical durability, it is also heavily influenced by the consumer. Therefore, understanding consumer attitudes toward product lifespans is essential for gaining insights into longevity. Specifically, this study investigates how consumers’ valuation of furniture impacts its lifespan.
The findings are based on data from semi-structured interviews and a survey provided by AAU Design Lab, analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis. The study introduces two terms to further specify the understanding of product lifespan: individual ownership lifespan and cumulative lifespan.
The study found that emotional attachment is not necessarily essential for achieving prolonged cumulative lifespan of furniture, challenging existing strategies like design for attachment and emotional durability. While these strategies influence individual ownership lifespan, the findings in this paper suggest that convenience is the key driver in extending the cumulative lifespan of furniture by enabling its reuse through accessible disposal methods and platforms. Accordingly, putting a stronger focus on the systems and contexts in which products exist could play an important role in extending their lifetime.
As this is a preliminary study with limited data, these findings should be considered an interesting starting point for further investigation.
References
Antonetti, P. & Maklan, S. (2014) Exploring Guilt and Pride in the Context of Sustainability. Psychology & Marketing, 31(9), 717-735. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20730
Almquist, E., Senior, J., & Bloch, N. (2016, September). The Elements of Value: Measuring—And delivering—What consumers really want. Harvard Business Review, Customer Strategy. https://hbr.org/2016/09/the-elements-of-value
Antonetti, P., & Maklan, S. (2014). Exploring Postconsumption Guilt and Pride in the Context of Sustainability. Psychology & Marketing, 31(9), 717–735. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20730
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Burnett, M. S., & Lunsford, D. A. (1994). Conceptualizing Guilt in the Consumer Decision‐making Process. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11(3), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769410065454
Chapman, J. (2015). Emotionally durable design: Objects, experiences and empathy (Second edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Cox, J., Griffith, S., Giorgi, S., & King, G. (2013). Consumer understanding of product lifetimes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 79, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.05.003
Dons, A. S. (2024, August 11). Nye byttebokse i tre bydele i Aalborg. https://ligeher.nu/aalborg/nyheder/det-sker/bytteboksene-rykker-endnu-taettere-paa-centrum/5184701
European Commission. (2024, March). EU’s Digital Product Passport: Advancing transparency and sustainability. https://data.europa.eu/en/news-events/news/eus-digital-product-passport-advancing-transparency-and-sustainability
Frahm, L. B., Laursen, L. N., & Tollestrup, C. (2022). Categories and Design Properties of Inherited Long-Lasting Products. Sustainability, 14(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073835
Haase, L. M., & Laursen, L. N. (2022). Designing for Longevity: Expert Strategies for Creating Long-Lasting Products. Routledge.
Løvbak Berg, L., & Hebrok, M. (2024). Holding on or letting go: Conflicting narratives of product longevity. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 210, 107834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107834
Mugge, R., Schoormans, J. P. L., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2005). Design Strategies to Postpone Consumers’ Product Replacement: The Value of a Strong Person-Product Relationship. The Design Journal, 8(2), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.2752/146069205789331637
Van Nes, N., & Cramer, J. (2005). Influencing product lifetime through product design. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(5), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.491
