Design Strategies to Strengthen Epistemic Value in Consumer Electronics and Prolong Product Lifetime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10369Keywords:
Consumer electronics, Epistemic value, Novelty, Product lifetime, Product satiationReferences
Ackermann, L., Tuimaka, M., Pohlmeyer, A. E., & Mugge, R. (2021). Design for Product Care - Development of Design Strategies and a Toolkit for Sustainable Consumer Behaviour. Journal of Sustainability Research, 3(2), e210013. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20210013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20210013
Casais, M., Mugge, R., & Desmet, P. (2018). Objects with symbolic meaning: 16 directions to inspire design for well-being. Journal of Design Research, 16(3-4), 247-281. https://doi.org/10.1504/jdr.2018.099538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2018.099538
Echegaray, F. (2016). Consumers' reactions to product obsolescence in emerging markets: the case of Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.119
Heijne, K., & Van der Meer, H. (2019). Road Map for Creative Problem Solving Techniques: Organizing and Facilitating Group Sessions. Boom uitgevers Amsterdam.
Jaeger-Erben, M., Proske, M., & Hielscher, S. (2023). Scalability and durability, or: is modular the new durable? The case of smartphones. In M. Jaeger-Erben, H. Wieser, M. Marwede, & F. Hofmann (Eds.), Durable Economies: Organizing the Material Foundations of Society (pp. 201-230). DOI: 10.14361/9783839463963-009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839463963-009
Khan, M. A., Mittal, S., West, S., & Wuest, T. (2018). Review on upgradability – A product lifetime extension strategy in the context of product service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 1154-1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.329
Magnier, L., & Mugge, R. (2022). Replaced too soon? An exploration of Western European consumers’ replacement of electronic products. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106448
Mugge, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2013). Seeking the Ideal Level of Design Newness: Consumer Response to Radical and Incremental Product Design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(S1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12062
Proske, M., & Jaeger-Erben, M. (2019). Decreasing obsolescence with modular smartphones? – An interdisciplinary perspective on lifecycles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.116
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8
Talke, K., Müller, S., & Wieringa, J. E. (2017). A matter of perspective: Design newness and its performance effects. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(2), 399-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2017.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2017.01.001
Van den Berge, R., Magnier, L., & Mugge, R. (2021). Too good to go? Consumers’ replacement behaviour and potential strategies for stimulating product retention. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.014
Van Nes, N. (2016). Understanding replacement behaviour and exploring design solutions. In T. Cooper (Ed.), Longer lasting products: Alternatives To The Throwaway Society (pp. 107-131). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315592930 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315592930
World Health Organization. (2024). Electronic waste (e-waste). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/electronic-waste-(e-waste)
Ylä-Mella, J., Keiski, R. L., & Pongrácz, E. (2022). End-of-Use vs. End-of-Life: When Do Consumer Electronics Become Waste? Resources, 11(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11020018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11020018