Sense of Order
The Effects of Machine Aesthetic on Biomaterials Favourability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10401Keywords:
Material experience, Sustainable materials, Circular economy, User emotive responseAbstract
Designers are increasingly creating materials from renewable and recycled sources to support a circular economy, aiming to mitigate the adverse effects of linear production and consumption. These materials are considered sustainable alternatives to non-renewable materials, such as fossil fuel-based plastics. While users may be drawn to the sustainability narrative and "biography" of such materials, the highly natural appearance of biomaterials can sometimes evoke unappealing user responses. This study examines how "machine aesthetics"—visible signs of production like graphical embossment and engraving—impact user perceptions of biomaterials. The research explores how surface alterations influence emotional responses and underlying appraisals by comparing reactions to biomaterial samples with a high degree of naturalness against those with embossed and engraved surfaces. Findings reveal that machine aesthetics evoke a sense of order, contributing to favourable responses and minimising other negative evaluations of the material aspects. Although users value biomaterials for their natural origins, structured human-imposed aesthetics satisfy a desire for aesthetic coherence and control. This finding suggests that people appreciate sustainable materials' natural imperfections when presented within a framework of manageability and familiarity.
References
Akbar, N., Abubakar, I. R., & Bouregh, A. S. (2020). Fostering Urban Sustainability through the Ecological Wisdom of Traditional Settlements. Sustainability, 12(23), 10033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310033
Alahira, J., Olu-lawal, K. A., Ejibe, I., & Ninduwezuor-Ehiobu, N. (2024). Sustainable materials and methods in industrial design: Bridging the gap with fine arts and graphic design for environmental innovation. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(3), 774–782. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i3.901
Ayala-Garcia, C., Scalabrini, M., & Cohen, N. (2024). DIYR: The Do-It- Yourself-Revolution. Diid, 1(82). https://doi.org/10.30682/diid8224i
Bahrudin, F. I. (2019). The Experiential Dimension of Sustainable Material. Imperial College London.
Bahrudin, F. I., & Aurisicchio, M. (2018). The appraisal of sustainable materials. Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, 6. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0455
Biccum, A. R. (2024). What do you need to know to live in the world? Global educational reform and the democratisation of knowledge. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2024.2312834
Branca, G., Resciniti, R., & Babin, B. J. (2024). Sustainable packaging design and the consumer perspective: a systematic literature review. Italian Journal of Marketing, 2024(1), 77–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-023-00084-1
Cordier, M., Uehara, T., Jorgensen, B., & Baztan, J. (2024). Reducing plastic production: Economic loss or environmental gain? Cambridge Prisms: Plastics, 2, e2. https://doi.org/10.1017/plc.2024.3
de Groot, B. G., Badreshany, K., Torres-Martínez, J. F., & Fernández-Götz, M. (2023). Capturing technological crossovers between clay crafts: An archaeometric perspective on the emergence of workshop production in Late Iron Age northern Spain. PLOS ONE, 18(5), e0283343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283343
Demir, E., Desmet, P. M. a, & Hekkert, P. (2009). Appraisal patterns of emotions in human- product interaction. International Journal of Design, 3(2), 41–51.
Desmet, P. (2003). Designing emotions. The Design Journal, 60–62.
Dhakal, U., Berardi, U., Gorgolewski, M., & Richman, R. (2017). Hygrothermal performance of hempcrete for Ontario (Canada) buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3655–3664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.102
Ebe, Y., & Umemuro, H. (2015). Emotion evoked by texture and application to emotional communication. Extended Abstracts of the ACM CHI’15 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2, 1995–2000. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732768
Fuchs, C., Schreier, M., & Van Osselaer, S. M. J. (2015). The Handmade Effect: What’s Love Got to Do with It? Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0018
Gifford, R., Hine, D. W., Muller-Clemm, W., Reynolds, D. J., & Shaw, K. T. (2000). Decoding Modern Architecture. Environment and Behavior, 32(2), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972487
Haines-Gadd, M., Chapman, J., Lloyd, P., Mason, J., & Aliakseyeu, D. (2018). Emotional Durability Design Nine—A Tool for Product Longevity. Sustainability, 10(6), 1948. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061948
Halada, K., & Yamamoto, R. (2001). The current status of research and development on ecomaterials around the world. MRS Bulletin, 26(11), 871–879.
Harris, E. M., Martin, D. G., Polsky, C., Denhardt, L., & Nehring, A. (2013). Beyond “Lawn People”: The Role of Emotions in Suburban Yard Management Practices. The Professional Geographer, 65(2), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2012.681586
Hasanah, U., Sukoco, B. M., Supriharyanti, E., & Wu, W.-Y. (2023). Fifty years of artisan entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00308-w
Haug, A. (2019). Acquiring materials knowledge in design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9445-4
Houf, L., Szymkowiak, A., & Shepherd, L. A. (2024). Promotion of Sustainable Products: Can Sustainability Labels Promote User Selection of Environmentally Friendly Products? Sustainability, 16(13), 5390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135390
Ignatieva, M., Haase, D., Dushkova, D., & Haase, A. (2020). Lawns in Cities: From a Globalised Urban Green Space Phenomenon to Sustainable Nature-Based Solutions. Land, 9(3), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9030073
Ismail, Z. H. (2024). Product Application Map for Emerging Sustainable Materials with Smell-Perceived Associations. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Karana, E. (2006). Intangible characteristics of materials in industrial design. Proceedings of the Design and Emotion Conference, 27-29th September.
Karana, E. (2009). Meanings of materials.
Karana, E. (2012). Characterization of “natural” and “high-quality” materials to improve perception of bio-plastics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37, 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.034
Karana, E., Barati, B., Rognoli, V., & Laan, A. Z. Van Der. (2015). Material Driven Design ( MDD ): A Method to Design for Material Experiences. 9(2), 35–54.
Karana, E., Pedgley, O., & Rognoli, V. (2013). Materials Experience: Fundamentals of Materials and Design. In Materials Experience: Fundamentals of Materials and Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-02198-9
Kesteren, I. E. H. van, Stappers, P. J., & Bruijin, J. C. M. de. (2007). Materials in Product Selection: Tools for Including User-Interaction in Materials Selection. International Journal of Design, 1(3), 41–55.
Kongot, A., & Matz, A. (2021). Perfectly Imperfect: A Speculation about Wabi-Sabi Inspired User Experience Design: Wabi-Sabi Inspired UX Design. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450370
Li, M., & Chapman, G. B. (2012). Why Do People Like Natural? Instrumental and Ideational Bases for the Naturalness Preference. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(12), 2859–2878. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00964.x
Liebl, M., & Roy, T. (2003). Handmade in India Preliminary Analysis of Crafts Producers and Crafts Production. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(51/52).
Magnier, L., & Crié, D. (2015). Communicating packaging eco-friendliness. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(4/5), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-04-2014-0048
Magnier, L., & Schoormans, J. (2015). Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.005
Markoff, J. (2012, August 18). Skilled Work, Without the Worker. The New York Times.
Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper & Row.
Meikle, J. L. (1997). Material doubts: the consequences of plastic. Environmental History, 2(3), 278–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985351
Mohd Salleh, M. N. (2012). Gerakan Baru dalam Senibina Lestari: Buluh Sebagai Sumber dan Bahan Binaan untuk Bangunan Hijau. Habitat Magazine.
Newport, R. (1997). Plastics and design. In S. Mossman (Ed.), Early plastics: perspectives 1850-1950 (p. 102). Leicester University Press.
Ortíz Nicolás, J. C. (2014). Understanding and designing pleasant experiences with products [Doctoral dissertation, Imperial College London]. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Overvliet, K. E., Karana, E., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2014). Perception of naturalness in textiles. Materials and Design, 90, 1192–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.039
Parisi, S., Rognoli, V., & Sonneveld, M. (2017). Material Tinkering. An inspirational approach for experiential learning and envisioning in product design education. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S1167–S1184. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353059
Pedgley, O., Rognoli, V., & Karana, E. (2021). Materials experience 2: expanding territories of materials and design. Matthew Deans.
Popescu, C., Dissanayake, H., Mansi, E., & Stancu, A. (2024). Eco Breakthroughs: Sustainable Materials Transforming the Future of Our Planet. Sustainability, 16(23), 10790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310790
Ram, S., & Sheth, J. N. (1989). Consumer Resistance to Innovation: The Role of Product Knowledge by Ram and Sheth: The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6, 1–12.
Rognoli, V., & Parisi, S. (2016). The material experiences as DIY-Materials : self The material experiences as DIY-Materials : June.
Rognoli, V., Petreca, B., Pollini, B., & Saito, C. (2022). Materials biography as a tool for designers’ exploration of bio-based and bio-fabricated materials for the sustainable fashion industry. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18(1), 749–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2124740
Saitō, Y. (2017). Japanese Gardens (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190456320.003.0009
Shashoua, Y. (2012). Conservation of plastics. Routledge.
Siyi, D., & Ayob, S. (2024). From Aesthetics to Design: Sustainability of Wabi-sabi in Ceramic Product Design in the Contemporary Context. Idealogy Journal, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v9i1.530
Spencer, C. (2021). Situationships: Creating Situations And Relationships For And With Material. Syracuse University.
Suggit, M. (1997). Living with plastics. In S. Mossman (Ed.), Early plastics: perspectives 1850-1950 (p. 125). Leicester University Press.
Tabassum, R. R., & Park, J. (2024). Development of a Building Evaluation Framework for Biophilic Design in Architecture. Buildings, 14(10), 3254. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103254
Thundathil, M., Nazmi, A. R., Shahri, B., Emerson, N., Müssig, J., & Huber, T. (2023). Visual–Tactile Perception of Biobased Composites. Materials, 16(5), 1844. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051844
Treviranus, J. (2010). The Value of Imperfection: the Wabi-Sabi Principle in Aesthetics and Learning. Open ED 2010 Proceedings, 2010, 1–10. http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/handle/10609/4869
Van Tonder, Lyons, M. J., & Gert, J. (2003). Structural order in Japanese “Karesansui” gardens. South African Journal of Art History, 18.
Venzo, P. (2019). Wabi Sabi: Intermediated Textures of Impermanence and Imperfection. Belas Infiéis, 8(3), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.26512/belasinfieis.v8.n3.2019.26340
Vermeir, I. (2020). How Visuals Affect Food Choice. Foods, 9(12), 1835. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121835
Wolfs, E. L. M. (2015). Biophilic Design and Bio-Collaboration. Archives of Design Research, 113(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2015.02.113.1.71
Xia, Y., Shao, Y., Zheng, Y., Yan, X., & Lyu, H. (2024). Bridging Nature and Urbanization: A Comprehensive Study of Biophilic Design in the Knowledge Economy Era. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02023-7
Yalch, R., & Brunel, F. (1996). Need hierarchies in consumer judgments of product designs: is it time to reconsider Maslow’s theory? Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 405–410.
Yoon, H. (1994). Two Different Geomentalities, Two Different Gardens: the French and the Japanese Cases. GeoJournal, 33(4), 471–477.
Zhang, Y., Song, Y., & Luo, J. (2023). The Effect of Sustainable and Natural Looking on Perceived Aesthetics and Eco-Friendliness in Building Material Evaluation. Buildings, 13(2), 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020483
Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006
