Worthy or not worthy? Repair motivations and barriers from consumers across fashion, furniture, and consumer electronics in Denmark
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10426Keywords:
Repair, Survey, Barrier, MotivationsAbstract
Never has human consumption and demand for products been this high, and the growing demand for products puts a strain on the finite resources available. Therefore, the need for prolonging the lifetime of existing consumer products has received increasing attention from governing bodies such as the European Commission e.g. shown in the ‘right-to-repair’ directive. While 77% percent of European citizens state they want to repair products before buying new, only 64% state that they have done it – and ~90% have never purchased clothing, smartphones, or televisions secondhand. Prolonging the lifetime of consumer products through repair is therefore an important point towards more sustainable consumption. Yet, a lot of broken products never enter a repair process. This paper aims to shed light on the barriers and motivations for repair to help increase the understanding of how more repairable products can get repaired. Through a Danish national survey (N=1068) and 11 semi-structured interviews, we identify main barriers and motivations for entering a repair process within three main product classifications: Consumer electronics, Fashion, and Furniture. We confirm existing findings that price of repair/replacement is a main motivator/barrier. We also identify perceived repairability and ease of cassation or replacement as barriers not previously described.
References
Auberger, A. (n.d.). The Race to Net Zero: Is the global business community on course to beat the clock? Https://Insight.Bakermckenzie.Com/. Retrieved 19 September 2024, from https://insight.bakermckenzie.com/race-to-net-zero
Bracquene, E., Peeters, J. R., Burez, J., De Schepper, K., Duflou, J. R., & Dewulf, W. (2019). Repairability evaluation for energy related products. Procedia CIRP, 80, 536–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.01.069
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Charter, M., & Keiller, S. W. (2016). The second global survey of repair cafés: A summary of findings. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:113441181
Cooper, T. (2010). The Significance of Product Longevity. In The Significance of Product Longevity (1st ed., pp. 3–36).
Cooper, T., & Salvia, G. (2018). Fix it: Barriers to repair and opportunities for change. In Subverting Consumerism. Routledge.
Dewberry, E. L., Sheldrick, L., Sinclair, M., Moreno, M., & Makatsoris, C. (2017). Developing scenarios for product longevity and sufficiency. In PLATE: Product Lifetimes And The Environment (pp. 108–113). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-820-4-108
Dewberry, E., Saca, L., Moreno, M., Sheldrick, L., Sinclair, M., Makatsoris, C., & Charter, M. (2016). A landscape of repair. Sustainable Innovation 2016: Circular Economy Innovation and Design, Epsom, UK. http://www.research.ucreative.ac.uk/3272/1/MC Top 30 paper.pdf
Diddi, S., & Yan, R.-N. (2019). Consumer Perceptions Related to Clothing Repair and Community Mending Events: A Circular Economy Perspective. Sustainability, 11(19), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195306
Duhoux, T., Lingås, D. B., & Mortensen, L. F. (2024). Volumes and destruction of returned and unsold textiles in Europe’s circular economy (ETC CE Report 2024/4). European Environment Agency; European Topic Centre; Circular economy and resource use. https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-ce/products/etc-ce-report-2024-4-volumes-and-destruction-of-returned-and-unsold-textiles-in-europes-circular-economy
European Commission. (2014). Attitudes of Europeans towards waste management and resource efficiency. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/14825
European Commission. (2018). Behavioural study on consumers’ engagement in the circular economy: Executive summary. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2818/921596
European Commission. (2023, 03). Right to repair: Making repair easier for consumers [Text]. European Commission - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_1794
European Commission. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 of the European Parliament and of the Council. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1781/oj/eng
European Parliament. (2024, March 21). Stopping greenwashing: How the EU regulates green claims. Topics | European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20240111STO16722/stopping-greenwashing-how-the-eu-regulates-green-claims
Fachbach, I., Lechner, G., & Reimann, M. (2022). Drivers of the consumers’ intention to use repair services, repair networks and to self-repair. Journal of Cleaner Production, 346, 130969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130969
Hernandez, R. J., Miranda, C., & Goñi, J. (2020). Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the ‘Right to Repair’. Sustainability, 12(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030850
Jørgensen, M. S. (2021). Erfaringer hos borgere i Region Hovedstaden med reparation og genbrug af elektriske og elektroniske produkter, beklædning og møbler. In Erfaringer hos borgere i Region Hovedstaden med reparation og genbrug af elektriske og elektroniske produkter, beklædning og møbler [Report]. https://vbn.aau.dk/da/publications/erfaringer-hos-borgere-i-region-hovedstaden-med-reparation-og-gen
Korsunova, A., Heiskanen, E., & Vainio, A. (2023). Consumer decision-making on repair in a circular economy: A process model based on experiences among young adults and stakeholders in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 405, 137052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137052
Laitala, K., Klepp, I. G., Haugrønning, V., Throne-Holst, H., & Strandbakken, P. (2021). Increasing repair of household appliances, mobile phones and clothing: Experiences from consumers and the repair industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 282, 125349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125349
Madon, J. (2022). Free repair against the consumer society: How repair cafés socialize people to a new relationship to objects. Journal of Consumer Culture, 22(2), 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521990871
Magnier, L., & Mugge, R. (2022). Replaced too soon? An exploration of Western European consumers’ replacement of electronic products. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 185, 106448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106448
McCollough, J. (2020). The impact of consumers’ time constraint and conspicuous consumption behaviour on the throwaway society. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12545
Mclaren, A., & McLauchlan, S. (2015). Crafting sustainable repairs: Practice-based approaches to extending the life of clothes. In Product Lifetimes And The Environment (PLATE): Conference Proceedings (pp. 221–228). Nottingham Trent University. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/crafting-sustainable-repairs-practice-based-approaches-to-extendi
Ministerie van Algemene Zaken. (2023, February 3). National Circular Economy Programme 2023—2030—Beleidsnota—Rijksoverheid.nl [Beleidsnota]. Ministerie van Algemene Zaken. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/beleidsnotas/2023/02/03/nationaal-programma-circulaire-economie-2023-2030
Nielsen, A. S. H., & Laursen, L. (2023, June 6). Love at first sight: Immediate emotional attachment of volunteers in repair cafés.
Nielsen, A. S. H., Laursen, L. N., & Tollestrup, C. (2023). Can you fix it? An investigation of critical repair steps and barriers across product types. Product Lifetimes and the Environment, Espoo, Finland.
Park, M. (2021). Closed for repair: Design affordances for product disassembly. https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/17440
Pit, L. (2020). An explorative research on the reasons why people repair their product at the Repair Café [MSc Thesis Management, Economics and Consumer Studies, Wageningen University]. https://repaircafe.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Thesis_Lianne_Pit_februari_2020.pdf
Rosner, D. K., & Ames, M. (2014). Designing for repair?: Infrastructures and materialities of breakdown. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531692
Statistics Denmark. (2024, September 2). BEBRIT21: Use of internet for private purposes—Per cent of the population(16-74 years) by type, equipment and behaviour when replacing. https://www.statistikbanken.dk/bebrit21
Terzioğlu, N. (2021). Repair motivation and barriers model: Investigating user perspectives related to product repair towards a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125644
Terzioğlu, N., Lockton, D., & Brass, C. (2015, November 10). Understanding User Motivations and Drawbacks Related to Product Repair. Sustainable Innovation 2015: ‘State of the Art’ Sustainable Innovation & Design. Towards Sustainable Product Design: 20th international conference, University of the creative arts, Epsom, Surrey, UK.
United Nations. (1987). Report of the World Comission on Environment and Development: Our common future. United Nations. https://www.are.admin.ch/are/en/home/media/publications/sustainable-development/brundtland-report.html
van den Berge, R., Magnier, L., & Mugge, R. (2023). Until death do us part? In-depth insights into Dutch consumers’ considerations about product lifetimes and lifetime extension. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 27(3), 908–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13372
Van Der Velden, M. (2021). ‘Fixing the World One Thing at a Time’: Community repair and a sustainable circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 304, 127151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127151
