Idle and Active Dresses

Design Briefings from the Wardrobe

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10427

Keywords:

Use phase, Wearing, Underutilisation, Wardrobe study, Dress archetype

Abstract

This paper explores how a wardrobe study, the dress audit, was combined with literature on the dress archetype to create a brief for fashion design practice that aims to increase the active wearing of dresses. Overall, clothing utilisation has declined by over a third in the last 15 years, with dresses being the least worn of any significant item. Unworn dresses amount to hidden wardrobe waste, and increasing their utilisation could reduce fashion overconsumption. 

A cultural examination of the dress through a lens of sustainability reveals an archetype of the Western fashion system, tied to production and consumption discourses with complex socio-political dimensions. In contrast, the wardrobe study provided vital insights into dress-wearing experiences. 

Most dresses are now mass-produced, creating a disconnect between designers and wearers, and this paper highlights some of the implications of this divide. The wardrobe study identified three leading factors that impact wearing: fit, occasion, and style. If designers address these three factors alone, it could mitigate up to 80% of low usage issues. These findings helped develop five baseline parameters and create a new brief for fashion design practice that prioritises greater garment utilisation by incorporating the lived experience of wearing within the design process. 

Author Biography

Alicja Kuzmycz, RMIT University, Australia

Alicja is a multi-disciplinary creative who blends fashion design, fine art, and communications. Her practice-based PhD looks to challenge the fashion industry's overproduction and underutilisation paradigm by incorporating wearing feedback into the design process.

References

Bari S (2020) Dressed: A Philosophy of Clothes. Basic Books, New York

Behnke A (2016) The International Politics of Fashion: Being Fab in a Dangerous World. Taylor & Francis Group, London

Buchanan R (1992) Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Des Issues 8:5. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637

Buran B, Fennetaux A (2020) The Pocket: A Hidden History of Women’s Lives. Yale University Press, New Haven & London

Calefato P (2021) Clothed Bodies. In: Fashion As Cultural Translation: Signs, Images, Narratives. Anthem Press, London

Carlson H (2023) Pockets: An Intimate History of How We Keep Things Close. Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill and New York

Catalpa JM, McGuire JK (2020) Mirror Epiphany: Transpersons’ Use of Dress to Create and Sustain Their Affirmed Gender Identities. In: Reilly A, Barry B (eds) Intellect Books. Intellect Books, Bristol

Chapman J (2005) Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences and Empathy, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

Chapman J (2021) Meaningful Stuff: Design That Lasts. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England

Conway D (2016) Margaret Thatcher, dress and the politics of fashion. In: Behnke A (ed) The International Politics of Fashion: Being Fab in a Dangerous World. Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York

Coscieme L, Akenji L, Latva-Hakuni E, et al (2022) Unfit, Unfair, Unfashionable: Resizing Fashion for a Fair Consumption Space. Hot or Cool Institute, Berlin

Fletcher K (2012) Durability, Fashion, Sustainability: The Processes and Practices of Use. Fash Pract J Des Creative Process Fash 4:221–238. https://doi.org/10.2752/175693812x13403765252389

Fletcher K (2016) Craft of Use: Post-Growth Fashion. Taylor & Francis Group, Oxon & New York

Ford RT (2021) Dress Codes: How the Laws of Fashion Made History. Simon & Schuster, New York

Frayling C (1994) Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers 1:

Gaillard SDM, Visser J (2022) Pockets, dresses and suppression – A philosophical reflection on clothing, agency, and identity. Technol Soc 69:101972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101972

Goldsworthy K (2017) The Speedcycle: a design-led framework for fast and slow circular fashion lifecycles. Design Journal.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352714

Guy A, Green E, Banim M (2001) Through the Wardrobe: Women’s Relationships with Their Clothes. Berg, Oxford

Holgar M (2022) Systemic Fashion Change and Wardrobe Research–Related Tools for Supporting Consumers. Int J Crime Justice Soc Democr 11:129–142. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.2373

Kawamura Y (2004) Fashion-ology : An Introduction to Fashion Studies. Bloomsbury Publishing, Oxford

Khan SI, Shaw M, Bandara P (2022) Socially Responsible Consumption and Marketing in Practice, Collection of Case Studies. 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6433-5_18

Klepp IG, Bjerck M (2014) A methodological approach to the materiality of clothing: Wardrobe studies. Int J Soc Res Methodol 17:373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.737148

Klepp IG, Laitala K, Wiedemann S (2020) Clothing Lifespans: What Should Be Measured and How. Sustainability 12:6219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156219

Laitala K, Klepp IG (2020) What Affects Garment Lifespans? International Clothing Practices Based on a Wardrobe Survey in China, Germany, Japan, the UK, and the USA. Sustainability-basel 12:9151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219151

Maguire H, Fahy F (2022) Practising fashion and wardrobe studies: A geographical reframing? Area 54:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12761

Maguire H, Fahy F (2023) Unlocking insights in the everyday: Exploring practices to foster sustainable maximum use of clothing. Clean Responsible Consum 8:100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100095

Mair C (2018) The Psychology of Fashion (The Psychology of Everything), 1st edn. Routledge, New York

Munasinghe PD, Dissanayake DGK, Druckman A (2022) An investigation of the mass-market fashion design process. Res J Text Appar 26:323–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/rjta-08-2020-0089

Neto A, Ferreira J (2023) Lasting Bonds: Understanding Wearer-Clothing Relationships through Interpersonal Love-Theory. Fash Theory ahead-of-print:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704x.2023.2170706

Niedderer K, Clune S, Ludden G (2017) Design for Behaviour Change. 250–260. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315576602-20

Niinimäki K (2024) Recycling and Lifetime Management in the Textile and Fashion Sector. Taylor & Francis Group

Paço A, Filho WL, Ávila LV, Dennis K (2021) Fostering sustainable consumer behavior regarding clothing: Assessing trends on purchases, recycling and disposal. Text Res J 91:373–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517520944524

Palmer A (2021) A cultural history of dress and fashion in the modern age. Zed Books, London, England

Payne A (2021) Designing Fashion’s Future: Present Practice and Tactics for Sustainable Change. pp 103–122

Payne A, Jiang X, Street P, et al (2024) Keeping Clothes Out of Landfill: A landscape survey of Australian consumer practices

Robinson T (2022) Body Styles: Redirecting Ethics and the Question of Embodied Empathy in Fashion Design. Fash Pract 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2022.2026048

Sellers K (2022) Australian Fashion Council - National Clothing Product Stewardship

Volonté P (2021) Fashion Technology: The Sizing System. In: Fat Fashion: The thin Ideal and the Segregation of Plus-Size Bodies. pp 121–141

Woodward S (2007) Why Women Wear What They Wear. Berg, Oxford, New York

Downloads

Published

24-06-2025

How to Cite

Kuzmycz, A., & McCorkill, G. (2025). Idle and Active Dresses: Design Briefings from the Wardrobe. Proceedings of the 6th Product Lifetimes and the Environment Conference (PLATE2025), (6). https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10427

Issue

Section

Track 11: Clothing, Footwear, and Accessories – Research Papers