Designing a collaborative ecosystem for sustainability transition in the furniture industry

The Opendesk case

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10431

Keywords:

Collaborative Ecosystem, Strategic Design, Sustainability Transitions, Furniture

Abstract

Humanity faces a period of changes, leading to a global transition with unpredictable outcomes. Design can play a key role in guiding society to face these challenges, helping the different socio-technical system stakeholders cope with the sustainable transition. The change towards more sustainable economic and social systems requires the design of products and services and new business models and integrated systems that deliver them. This implies shifting from individual company thinking towards coalitions and partnerships like collaborative ecosystems.

The furniture industry is facing a sustainable transition, therefore, companies and the market are experimenting with new approaches, including collaborative ecosystems. Because of this, it is important to understand how design can contribute to the definition, creation, and development of a collaborative ecosystem for sustainable transition in the furniture industry. The article adopts the single case study methodology, proposing the analysis of Opendesk, a furniture delocalised network.

The research shows how the design mindset has enabled Opendesk to create a collaborative, scalable, and resilient business that values stakeholders in the system and local production. It was possible to address the challenges of building and maintaining a community and network, creating engagement through design. Through the design mindset in the creation of a collaborative ecosystem, it was possible to help local manufacturers to be efficient and economically viable, allowing customers to contribute to the local economy and value. The case study shows the potential of design to catalyse relationships for fruitful collaborations between stakeholders with different goals and provide systemic innovations.

References

Angus-Leppan, T., Benn, S., & Young, L. (2010). A sensemaking approach to trade-offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.675

Baldassarre, B., Calabretta, G., Bocken, N., Diehl, J.-C., & Duygu, K. (2019). The evolution of the Strategic role of Designers for Sustainable Development: Academy for Design Innovation Management Conference 2019. In E. Bohemia, G. Gemser, C. de Bont, N. Fain, & R. Assoreira Almendra (Eds.), Academy for Design Innovation Management Conference 2019 (Vol. 2, pp. 1–15). Academy for Design Innovation Management.

Bocken, N., Boons, F., & Baldassarre, B. (2019). Sustainable business model experimentation by understanding ecologies of business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1498–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.159

Brown, P., Bocken, N., & Balkenende, R. (2019). Why Do Companies Pursue Collaborative Circular Oriented Innovation? Sustainability, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030635

Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 84–92, 141.

Buchanan, R. (2001). Design Research and the New Learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056

Buchanan, R. (2015). Worlds in the Making: Design, Management, and the Reform of Organizational Culture. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2015.09.003

Ceschin, F., & Gaziulusoy, İ. A. (2019). Design for Sustainability: A Multi-level Framework from Products to Socio-technical Systems. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429456510

Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The International Geosphere–Biosphere Programme (IGBP): A Study of Global Change of the International Council for Science (ICSU). Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.

Dong, A. (2015). Design × innovation: Perspective or evidence-based practices†. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 3(3–4), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2014.943294

Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006

Drew, C., Winhall, J., & Robinson, C. (2022). System-Shifting Design: An emerging practice explored. Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design. RSD11, Brighton, UK.

Forrest, A., Hilton, M., Ballinger, A., & Whittaker, D. (2017). Circular Economy Opportunities in the Furniture Sector. European Environment Bureau.

Gartenberg, C. M. (2021). Purpose-Driven Companies and Sustainability (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3786823). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3786823

Goffin, K., Åhlström, P., Bianchi, M., & Richtnér, A. (2019). Perspective: State-of-the-Art: The Quality of Case Study Research in Innovation Management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(5), 586–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12492

Harvey, W. S. (2011). Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111404329

Harwood, T. G., & Garry, T. (2003). An Overview of Content Analysis. The Marketing Review, 3(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934703771910080

Hill, D. (2017). Dark Matter and Trojan Horses: A strategic Design Vocabulary (3rd Ed.). Strelka Press.

Irwin, T. (2018). The Emerging Transition Design Approach. In C. Storni, K. Leahy, M. McMahon, P. Lloyd, & E. Bohemia (Eds.), Design as a catalyst for change—DRS International Conference 2018. https://doi.org/10.21606/dma.2017.210

Julien, H. (2008). Content Analysis. In L. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 120–121). SAGE Publications.

Kania, J., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Collective Impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.48558/5900-KN19

Konietzko, J., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2020). Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942

Kramer, M. R., & Pfitzer, M. W. (2016). The Ecosystem of Shared Value. Harvard Business Review.

Lavrsen, J. C., Carbon, C.-C., & Daalhuizen, J. (2024). Developing design mindset: How individual and contextual factors influence the development of design mindset through method teaching. Journal of Engineering Design. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2024.2419316

Manzini, E. (2017). Designing coalitions: Design for social forms in a fluid world. Strategic Design Research Journal, 10(2), Article 2. DOI: 10.4013/sdrj.2017.102.12

Mosca, F., Tamborrini, P., & Casalegno, C. (2015). Systemic Design: How to Compete by Leveraging the Value System. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management. https://doi.org/10.4468/2015.2.04mosca.tamborrini.casalegno

Oswick, C., & Robertson, M. (2009). Communicating Knowledge: Boundary Objects as Texts. 20th International Academy of Business Disciplines Meeting, St Louis, USA.

Papile, F. (2022). OSMOSIS Methods and tools to reframe material selection. A cooperative approach for idustrial companies towards sustainable transition. Politecnico di Milano.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review.

Quint, E. (2024). Collaborative Creativity: A design approach to systemic challenges navigating the innovation ecosystem. Journal of Innovation Management, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_012.002_L001

Raskin, P., Banuri, T., Gallopín, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A., Kates, R., & Swart, R. (2002). Great Transition: The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead (SEI PoleStar Series Report No. 10).

Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2008). Transition management: Reflexive governance of societal complexity through searching, learning and experimenting. In J. C. vd Bergh & F. R. Bruisma (Eds.), Managing the Transition to Renewable Energy (pp. 15–46). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion With Case Studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160882

Talmar, M., Walrave, B., Podoynitsyna, K. S., Holmström, J., & Romme, A. G. L. (2020). Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The Ecosystem Pie Model. Long Range Planning, 53(4), 101850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002

Van Selm, M., & Mulder, I. (2019). On transforming transition design: From promise to practice. Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management. Research perspectives in the era of transformations, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.33114/adim.2019.03_323

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5thed ed.). SAGE.

Zurlo, F. (2022). Le strategie del desiderio. In Il cucchiaio e la città. Electa.

Downloads

Published

24-06-2025

How to Cite

Italia, M., Pei, X., & Migliozzi, S. (2025). Designing a collaborative ecosystem for sustainability transition in the furniture industry: The Opendesk case. Proceedings of the 6th Product Lifetimes and the Environment Conference (PLATE2025), (6). https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10431

Issue

Section

Track 3: Business Models for Longevity – Research Papers