One man’s trash is another man’s treasure
Actor constellations to prolong the life of ‘new waste’ resources
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10435Keywords:
Pre-consumer waste, New waste, Multiple case study, ARA modelAbstract
The overconsumption of finite resources and the growing climate crisis necessitate innovative manufacturing waste management approaches. This study investigates the untapped potential of redesigning waste materials—specifically, pre-consumer waste or "new waste"—to create value while mitigating environmental impact. Unlike recycling or disposal, this approach leverages the inherent qualities of discarded manufacturing materials derived from virgin resources, aligning with the European Union's waste hierarchy principles. Using a multiple case study methodology, we analysed eight collaborations between manufacturing companies and industrial designers. The actor-resources-activities model was employed to understand how these partnerships foster redesign and prolong material lifespans. Our findings reveal that strategic actor roles and interactions are crucial in activating redesign potential, enabling the transformation of waste materials into new products. The crucial actor roles consist of an industrial designer, a waste owner, a waste processor, and a sales & distribution actor. The results highlight significant business and environmental opportunities, including cost reductions and waste diversion from landfills. However, realising this potential requires targeted interventions to facilitate cross-disciplinary collaborations and align objectives among stakeholders. By illustrating successful constellations of actors and processes, this research provides actionable insights into unlocking new avenues for circular economy practices in manufacturing.
References
Ali, A. K., Wang, Y., & Alvarado, J. L. (2019). Facilitating industrial symbiosis to achieve circular economy using value-added by design: A case study in transforming the automobile industry sheet metal waste-flow into Voronoi facade systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.202
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Directive 2008/98/EC (2024). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/98/2024-02-18/eng
Douglas, E. P., Jordan, S., Lande, M., & Bumbaco, A. (2015). Artifact elicitation as a method of qualitative inquiry in engineering education. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Vol. 122).
Du, Y., Cao, H., Chen, X., & Wang, B. (2013). Reuse-oriented redesign method of used products based on axiomatic design theory and QFD. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.032
Ellström, P.-E., Elg, M., Wallo, A., Berglund, M., & Kock, H. (2020). Interactive research: Concepts, contributions and challenges. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(8), 1517–1537. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-09-2018-0304
European Commission. (2021, July 14). The European Green Deal. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
Feast, L., & Laursen, L. (2023). Design from Waste Materials: Situation, Problem, and Solution. Learn X Design Conference Series. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/learnxdesign/learnxdesign2023/fullpaper/16. https://doi.org/10.21606/drslxd.2024.056
Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Håkansson, H., Snehota, I., & Waluszewski, A. (2008). Analysing Business Interaction. 24th IMP Conference. https://doi.org/10.20935/AcadEng7407
Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (Eds.). (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. Routledge.
Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (Ipcc). (2023). Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896
Jensen, N. S., Laursen, L. N., Bak, B. L. V., & Damgaard-Møller, E. (2024, June 24). Starting from Scraps: Designerly Assessment of Waste Materials. Design Research Society. DRS 2024 Boston. Resistance, Recovery, Reflection, Reimagination, Northeastern University, Boston, MA USA. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.888
Jungell-Michelsson, J., & Heikkurinen, P. (2022). Sufficiency: A systematic literature review. Ecological Economics, 195, 107380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107380
Kaza, S., Yao, L. C., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0
Møller, L., & Laursen, L. N. (2023). Designing for longevity: Expert strategies for creating long-lasting products. Routledge.
Niessen, L., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2021). How can businesses drive sufficiency? The business for sufficiency framework. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1090–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.030
Pacelli, F., Ostuzzi, F., & Levi, M. (2015). Reducing and reusing industrial scraps: A proposed method for industrial designers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.088
Sampah, S. N. A., Barfi-Mensah, H. M., Mensah, E. F., Vicku, C., Adja-Koadade, M., & Junior, A.-A. (2024). Exploring sustainable aesthetics through repurposed studio waste materials for unorthodox finishes. Cleaner Waste Systems, 8, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100147
Wallwey, C., & Kajfez, R. L. (2023). Quantitative research artifacts as qualitative data collection techniques in a mixed methods research study. Methods in Psychology, 8, 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2023.100115
