Transport assessment and risk analysis: the case of the 2nd fixed link across the Danube River

Authors

  • Nedyalka Mudova Department of Transport, Technical University of Denmark
  • Kim Bang Salling Department of Transport, Technical University of Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.td.v16i1.5457

Keywords:

cost-benefit analysis, decision support model, optimism bias, quantitative risk analysis, monte carlo simulation

Abstract

The scope of this paper is to present a new methodology for appraising transport infrastructure projects. Conventionally, transport infrastructure appraisal is conducted by the use of cost-benefit analyses (CBA) in order to produce aggregated single point estimates. However, new research has proved that the embedded uncertainties within traditional CBA such as ex-ante based investment costs and travel time savings are of high significance. This paper investigates the latter two impacts in terms of the Optimism Bias principle which is used to take account of the underestimation of construction costs and the overestimation of travel time savings. By extending this principle into stochastic modelling where a quantitative risk analysis (QRA) is applied, so-called feasibility risk assessment is provided by moving from point (deterministic CBA) to interval (stochastic QRA) results. Hereby, decision support as illustrated in this paper will aim to provide assistance in the development and ultimately the choice of action, while accounting for the uncertainties surrounding transport appraisal schemes. Evidently, the methodological approach is illustrated by a case example from the Northern region of Bulgaria.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2009

How to Cite

Mudova, N., & Salling, K. B. (2009). Transport assessment and risk analysis: the case of the 2nd fixed link across the Danube River. Proceedings from the Annual Transport Conference at Aalborg University, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.td.v16i1.5457

Issue

Section

Trafikpolitik og organisation – Klima og planlægning