Non-Financial Reporting, Double Materiality, and Business Model Evaluation: An Empirical Study of ESG Ratings in Europe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/jobm.v13i2.9251Abstract
Purpose: This paper investigates the adoption of non-financial reporting (NFR) standards and the double materiality (DM) principle, and their possible implications on external performance measures, namely ESG ratings. By doing so, it positions reporting practices as mechanisms that affect disclosure quality and the transparency and accountability of firms’ business models.
Design/Methodology/Approach: Longitudinal analysis over three years (2020–2022) was conducted using the 366 European listed companies' annual reports. Descriptive statistics and ordinary least squares regressions were employed to analyze the association between reporting practices, DM adoption, and ESG ratings from several rating agencies.
Findings: The results show that the adoption of non-financial reporting frameworks is associated with higher ESG ratings among European firms. However, the early adoption of double materiality does not yet have a significant impact on ESG performance at this stage.
Research implications: The study contributes to the business model literature by demonstrating how reporting practices and regulatory development build external representations of firms' value creation, delivery, and capture. It highlights the role of disclosure frameworks and double materiality as institutional forces with the capacity to transform business models to meet stakeholder and regulatory pressures.
Originality/Value: This study is one of the first longitudinal tests that empirically analyze the impact of non-financial reporting frameworks and DM on ESG ratings, and which sheds new light on how they impact evaluation of sustainable business model.
References
Adams, C.A., Alhamood, A., He, X., Tian, J., Wang, L. and Wang, Y. (2021), The double-materiality concept: Application and issues, Durham University Research Repository, available at: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1634333 (accessed 12 July 2023).
Alexander, F. (2022), One small step from financial materiality to sesquimateriality: A critical conceptual leap for the ISSB, SSRN, available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4056602
Antolín-López, R. and Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2023), Measuring and disclosing environmental, social and governance (ESG) information and performance, European Commission Report, available at: https://doi.org/10.2760/864272
Aras, G. and Hacioglu Kazak, E. (2022), Enhancing firm value through the lens of ESG materiality: Evidence from the banking sector in OECD countries, Sustainability, Vol. 14 No. 22, p.15302, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215302
Atanassov, A. (2022), Current trends in European sustainability reporting legislation, Izvestia na Sayuza na Uchenite – Varna, Seria Ikonomicheski Nauk, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp.77–89, available at: https://doi.org/10.14748/isuvsme.v26i1.8113
Avetisyan, E. and Ferrary, M. (2013), Dynamics of stakeholders’ implications in the institutionalization of the CSR field in France and in the United States, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 115 No. 1, pp.115–133, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1386-3
Banke, M., Lenger, S. and Pott, C. (2022), ESG ratings in the corporate reporting of DAX40 companies in Germany: Effects on market participants, Sustainability, Vol. 14 No. 15, p.9742, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159742
Baumüller, J. and Sopp, K. (2022), Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: Review, outlook and implications, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp.8–28, available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2021-0114
Berg, F., Kölbel, J.F. and Rigobon, R. (2022), Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings, Review of Finance, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp.1315–1344, available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3438533
Bossut, M., Jürgens, I., Pioch, T., Schiemann, F., Spandel, T. and Tietmeyer, R. (2021), What information is relevant for sustainability reporting? The concept of materiality and the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, Policy Brief, No. 7, p.2021. https://wpsf.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/WPSF_PolicyBrief_7-2021_Materiality.pdf (accessed 23 February 2022).
Bui, B., Chelli, M. and Houqe, M.N. (2022), Climate change disclosure ratings: The ideological play, Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp.1367–1392, available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2020-1021
Carroll, A.B. (2008), A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices, available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0002
Christensen, D.M., Serafeim, G. and Sikochi, A. (2022), Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings, The Accounting Review, Vol. 97 No. 1, pp.147–175, available at: https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0506
Conway, E. (2019), To agree or disagree? An analysis of CSR ratings firms, Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp.152–177, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2019.1613248
De Cristofaro, T. and Gulluscio, C. (2023), In search of double materiality in non-financial reports: First empirical evidence, Sustainability, Vol. 15 No. 2, p.924, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020924
Dewi, A.A., Saraswati, E., Rahman, A.F. and Atmini, S. (2023), Materiality, stakeholder engagement disclosure, and corporate governance: Critical elements for the quality of sustainability reporting, Cogent Business & Management, Vol. 10 No. 1, p.2175437, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2175437
Dormann, C.F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., Marquéz, J.R.G., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P.J. and Münkemüller, T. (2013), Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance, Ecography, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp.27–46, available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
Du, S. and Yu, K. (2021), Do corporate social responsibility reports convey value relevant information? Evidence from report readability and tone, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 172 No. 2, pp.253–274, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04496-3
Escrig-Olmedo, E., Fernández-Izquierdo, M.Á., Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Rivera-Lirio, J.M. and Muñoz-Torres, M.J. (2019), Rating the raters: Evaluating how ESG rating agencies integrate sustainability principles, Sustainability, Vol. 11 No. 3, p.915, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030915
European Commission (2023), Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive (EU) 2013/34 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards (European Sustainability Reporting Standards – ESRS), Official Journal of the European Union, L 459, pp.1–441, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2772/oj (accessed 17 January 2023).
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2014), Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups (Non-Financial Reporting Directive), Official Journal of the European Union, L 330, pp.1–9, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj (accessed 04 April 2021).
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2022), Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive), Official Journal of the European Union, L 322, pp.15–63, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj (accessed 06 January 2023).
Fiaschi, D., Giuliani, E., Nieri, F. and Salvati, N. (2020), How bad is your company? Measuring corporate wrongdoing beyond the magic of ESG metrics, Business Horizons, Vol. 63 No. 3, pp.287–299, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.09.004
Freeman, R.E. (2010), Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
García, C.B., García, J., López Martín, M.M. and Salmerón, R. (2015), Collinearity: Revisiting the variance inflation factor in ridge regression, Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp.648–661, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2014.980789
Giannarakis, G., Konteos, G. and Sariannidis, N. (2014), Financial, governance and environmental determinants of corporate social responsible disclosure, Management Decision, Vol. 52 No. 10, pp.1928–1951, available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2014-0296
Haller, A., Link, M. and Groß, T. (2017), The term ‘non-financial information’ – A semantic analysis of a key feature of current and future corporate reporting, Accounting in Europe, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp.407–429, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2017.1374548
Hummel, K. and Jobst, D. (2024a), An overview of corporate sustainability reporting legislation in the European Union, Accounting in Europe, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp.320–355, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2024.2312145
Hummel, K. and Jobst, D. (2024b), The EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive and Loan Costs: Insights from Syndicated Loans, SSRN, available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4641046
In, S.Y. and Schumacher, K. (2021), Carbonwashing: A new type of carbon data-related ESG greenwashing, SSRN, available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3901278
Khan, M.A. and Chinnasamy, J. (2022), "Non-financial reporting research in developed and developing countries", International Research Journal of Business Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 143–165. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.15.2.143-165
Kotsantonis, S. and Serafeim, G. (2019), Four things no one will tell you about ESG data, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp.50–58, available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12346
Lai, A., Melloni, G. and Stacchezzini, R. (2016), Corporate sustainable development: Is ‘integrated reporting’ a legitimation strategy?, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp.165–177, available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1863
Liu, W. (2022), Research on the materiality standard of inside information, Modern Economy, Vol. 13 No. 8, pp.1115–1125, available at: https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2022.138058
Lüdeke-Freund, F., Massa, L. and Breuer, H. (2024), Sustainable business model design, Journal of Business Models (JOBM), Vol. 12 No. 1, pp.115–132, available at: https://doi.org/10.54337/jbm.v12i1.8409
Madison, N. and Schiehll, E. (2021), The effect of financial materiality on ESG performance assessment, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 7, p.3652, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073652
Manes-Rossi, F., Tiron-Tudor, A., Nicolò, G. and Zanellato, G. (2018), Ensuring more sustainable reporting in Europe using non-financial disclosure—De facto and de jure evidence, Sustainability, Vol. 10 No. 4, p.1162, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041162
Modugu, K.P. (2020), Do corporate characteristics improve sustainability disclosure? Evidence from the UAE, International Journal of Business Performance Management, Vol. 21 Nos. 1–2, pp.39–54, available at: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2020.106106
Montemari, M., Chiucchi, M.S. and Nielsen, C. (2019), Designing performance measurement systems using business models, Journal of Business Models (JOBM), Vol. 7 No. 5, pp.48–69, available at: https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jbm.v7i5.1905
Nielsen, C. (2023), How regulation affects business model innovation, Journal of Business Models (JOBM), Vol. 11 No. 3, pp.105–116, available at: https://doi.org/10.54337/jbm.v11i3.8127
Oliver Yébenes, M. (2024), Climate change, ESG criteria and recent regulation: Challenges and opportunities, Eurasian Economic Review, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp.87–120, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00251-x
Perrini, F. (2006), The practitioner’s perspective on non-financial reporting, California Management Review, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp.73–103, available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166339
Pronobis, P. and Venuti, F. (2021), Accounting for sustainability: Current initiatives to standardize ESG reporting, ESCP Working Paper, available at: https://academ.escpeurope.eu/pub/IP%202021-18-EN.pdf (accessed 09 March 2023).
Roslender, R. and Lund, M. (2024), Theorising in the business model domain: Some pathways to pursue, Journal of Business Models (JOBM), Vol. 12 No. 3, pp.64–72, available at: https://doi.org/10.54337/jbm.v12i3.8473
Santamaria, R., Paolone, F., Cucari, N. and Dezi, L. (2021), Non-financial strategy disclosure and environmental, social and governance score: Insight from a configurational approach, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp.1993–2007, available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2728
Scalet, S. and Kelly, T.F. (2010), CSR rating agencies: What is their global impact?, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 94 No. 1, pp.69–88, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0250-6
Schramade, W. (2016), Bridging sustainability and finance: The value driver adjustment approach, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp.17–28, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1176425
Stolowy, H. and Paugam, L. (2018), The expansion of non-financial reporting: An exploratory study, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 48 No. 5, pp.525–548, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1470141
Suchman, M.C. (1995), Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp.571–610, available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Tang, H. (2022), The effect of ESG performance on corporate innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and agency cost, Sustainability, Vol. 14 No. 7, p.3769, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073769
Umoren, A.O., Udo, E.J. and George, B.S. (2015), Environmental, social and governance disclosures: A call for integrated reporting in Nigeria, Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol. 3 No. 6, pp.227–233, available at: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20150306.19
Veenstra, E.M. and Ellemers, N. (2020), ESG indicators as organizational performance goals: Do rating agencies encourage a holistic approach?, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 24, p.10228, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410228
Wilburn, K. and Wilburn, R. (2013), Using global reporting initiative indicators for CSR programs, Journal of Global Responsibility, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp.62–75, available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/20412561311324078
Worthington-Smith, M.D. and Giamporcaro, S. (2022), ESG materiality: Insights from the South African investment industry, in Handbook of Research on Global Aspects of Sustainable Finance in Times of Crises, IGI Global Scientific Publishing, pp.217–240, available at: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8501-6.ch011
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles published in Journal of Business Models follow the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivs (by-nc-nd). Further information about Creative Commons
