The meaning of punctuation

Interlexical realisations of logico-semantic relations in Swedish

Forfattere

  • Alexander Katourgi Lund University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.globe.v20i1.11644

Resumé

Sentence-internal punctuation marks are rarely used clause-internally and more often delimit clauses from other clauses and non-clausal supplements. The present study explores how thusly delimited clauses and supplements semantically relate to their frame clause. These supplement structures are treated as clause complexes, regardless of the form of their segments, and analysed using SFG’s logico-semantic relations, with a focus on the quantitative differences between sentences based on the delimiting punctuation mark: colon, dash or parenthesis.
The most common logico-semantic relation marked by these punctuation marks is Elaboration, reflecting that the three punctuation marks are more or less interchangeable in appositions. But there are significant quantitative differences between the marks: Elaboration is more common with parentheses, while dash to a higher degree marks Extension and Enhancement, and colon often marks projection—including Interpersonal projection, which is here presented as a relation type on its own. From a methodological and theoretical point of view, a clear result is also the fact that the relations between clauses and non-clausal supplements are highly receptible to logico-semantic analysis, despite this generally being reserved for the relations between clauses. The study paves the way for a wider application of the system of logico-semantic relations in the future.

Referencer

Arús-Hita, Jorge, Kazuhiro Teruya, Mohamed Ali Bardi, Abhishek Kumar Kashyap & Isaac N. Mwinlaaru (2018). ‘Quoting and reporting across languages: A system-based and text-based typology’. Word, 64(2): 69–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2018.1463001

Bateman, John A & Klaas Jan Rondhuis (1997). ‘Coherence relations: Towards a general specification’. Discourse processes, 2(1): 3–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545006

Bredel, Ursula (2008). Die Interpunktion des Deutschen: Ein kompositionelles System zur Online-Steuerung des Lesens. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

Dahl, Alva (2015). I skriftens gränstrakter: Interpunktionens funktioner i tre samtida svenska romaner. Uppsala: Department of Scandinavian languages, Uppsala University.

Dawkins, John (1995). ‘Teaching punctuation as a rhetorical tool’. College composition and communication, 46(4): 533–548. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc19958721

Döring, Sandra (2015). ‘Parentheticals are – presumably – CPs’. In Kluck, Marlies, Dennis Ott & Mark de Vries (eds.), Parenthesis and ellipsis: Cross-linguistic and theoretical perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 109–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514831.109

Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K Pullum (eds.) (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530

Jones, Bernard (1996). What’s the point? A (computational) theory of punctuation. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva (2011). ‘On thetical grammar’. Studies in language, 35(4): 852–897. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal

Karhiaho, Izabela (2003). Der Doppelpunkt im Deutschen: Kontextbedingungen und Funktionen. Gothenburg: Department of German, Gothenburg University.

Karlsson, Ola (ed.) (2017). Svenska skrivregler (4th ed.). Stockholm: Liber.

Katourgi, Alexander (2024). Kolon: Ett interpersonellt skiljetecken. In: Svenskans beskrivning, 38(1): 84–100. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-113368

Levinson, Joan Persily (1985). Punctuation and the orthographic sentence: A linguistic analysis. New York City: City University of New York.

Mann, William C. & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen (1991). ‘Functions of language in two frameworks’. Word, 42(3): 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1991.11435839

Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & Kazuhiro Teruya (2024). Systemic Functional Linguistics: A Complete Guide. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315675718

Nunberg, Geoffrey (1990). The linguistics of punctuation. Stanford: Center for the study of language and information, Stanford University.

Ott, Dennis & Mark de Vries (2016). ‘Right-dislocation as deletion’. Natural language & Linguistic Theory, 34(2): 641–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9307-7

Patt, Sebastian (2013). Punctuation as a means of medium-dependent presentation structure in English: Exploring the guide functions of punctuation. Tübingen: Narr. https://doi.org/10.24053/9783823377535

Potts, Christopher (2005). The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273829.001.0001

Quirk, Randolph, Sydney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.

Renkema, Jan (2009). The texture of discourse: Towards an outline of connectivity theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Retriever (n.d.). Mediearkivet. https://retriever.se/mediearkivet

Rössler, Paul, Peter Besl & Anna Saller (eds.) (2022). Vergleichende Interpunktion – Comparative punctuation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110756319

Teleman, Ulf, Staffan Hellberg & Erik Andersson (1999). Svenska Akademiens grammatik – vol. 4. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien & Norstedts ordbok.

de Vries, Mark (2009). ‘Specifying coordination: An investigation into the syntax of dislocation, extraposition and parenthesis’. In Dreyer, Cynthia R. (ed.), Language and linguistics: Emerging trends. Hauppauge: Nova. 37–98.

Downloads

Publiceret

24-09-2026

Nummer

Sektion

SFL: Sprogets rolle i vores multimodale tilgang til verden