Factors Influencing Trust in Geothermal Energy Projects Case of Seven Projects in East-Africa
Main Article Content
Abstract
Geothermal energy is widely considered a clean and renewable energy source, yet it faces significant social opposition in several countries, including Japan, Kenya, Greece, and Switzerland, among others. These challenges are often linked to trust issues. East African countries are actively developing their geothermal energy resources; however, some projects, such as the Olkaria IV and Akiira geothermal energy projects in Kenya, have faced social resistance. This study investigates the factors influencing trust in geothermal energy projects by analyzing public participation materials included in the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) reports of seven geothermal projects in the East African region.
Firstly, 150 comments related to trust were selected from a total of 680 comments in the public participation materials. Secondly, a two-step qualitative inductive coding approach was employed to develop four trust categories and fifteen issue-related codes. Finally, dummy variables were created using SPSS 24, and statistical analyses, including correlation and chi-square tests, were conducted. The findings indicate that trust issues predominantly concern corporate trust (34.67%), technological trust (33.33%), and procedural trust (28.67%). Correlation and chi-square analyses revealed that these concerns are linked to employment, corporate support (e.g., corporate social responsibility projects), environmental and social risks, and public engagement.
This study emphasizes the importance of fairness and transparency in employment, corporate social responsibility activities, and public engagement, as well as the necessity of communicating and mitigating environmental and social risks both before and during the implementation of geothermal energy projects. It recommends that policymakers establish clear, transparent guidelines for public engagement and strengthen legal frameworks regarding land ownership and resettlement to reduce conflicts. Additionally, corporates should focus on enhancing transparency in corporate practices and ensuring procedural fairness to foster trust with local communities and leaders.
Article Details
Articles published in International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management are following the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivs (by-nc-nd). Further information about Creative Commons
Authors can archive post-print (final draft post-refereering) on personal websites or institutional repositories under these conditions:
- Publishers version cannot be stored elsewhere but on publishers homepage
- Published source must be acknowledged
- Must link to publisher version
References
[1] Kubota, H., Hondo, H., Hienuki, S., & Hideshi, K. (2013). Determining barriers to developing geothermal power generation in Japan: Societal acceptance by stakeholders involved in hot springs. Energy Policy, 61, 1079-1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.084
[2] Benighaus, C., & Bleicher, A. (2019). Neither risky technology nor renewable electricity: Contested frames in the development of geothermal energy in Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, 47, 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.022
[3] Ejderyan, O., Ruef, F., & Stauffacher, M. (2020). Entanglement of top-down and bottom-up: Sociotechnical innovation pathways of geothermal energy in Switzerland. The Journal of Environment and Development, 29(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496519886008
[4] Kong’ani, L. N. S., Wahome, R. G., & Thenya, T. (2021). Variety and management of developmental conflicts: The case of the Olkaria IV geothermal energy project in Kenya. Conflict, Security & Development, 21(6), 781-804. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2021.2000806
[5] Barich, A., Stokłosa, A. W., Hildebrand, J., Elíasson, O., Medgyes, T., Quinonez, G., Casillas, A. C., & Fernandez, I. (2021). Social license to operate in geothermal energy. Energies, 15(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010139
[6] Payera, S. V. (2018). Understanding social acceptance of geothermal energy: Case study for Araucanía region, Chile. Geothermics, 72, 138-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.10.014
[7] Chavot, P., Heimlich, C., Masseran, A., Serrano, Y., Zoungrana, J., & Bodin, C. (2018). Social shaping of deep geothermal projects in Alsace: Politics, stakeholder attitudes, and local democracy. Geothermal Energy, 6, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-018-0111-6
[8] Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683-2691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
[9] Nkinyam, C. M., Ujah, C. O., Asadu, C. O., & Kallon, D. V. (2025). Exploring Geothermal Energy as a Sustainable Source of Energy: A systemic Review. Unconventional Resources, 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uncres.2025.100149
[10] Agoundedemba, M., Kim, C. K., & Kim, H. G. (2023). Energy status in Africa: challenges, progress and sustainable pathways. Energies, 16(23), 7708, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16237708
[11] ThinkGeoEnergy. (n.d.). Geothermal energy production & utilisation. ThinkGeoEnergy. Retrieved April 5, 2025, from https://www.thinkgeoenergy.com/geothermal/geothermal-energy-production-utilisation/
[12] Hughes, L., & Rogei, D. (2020). Feeling the heat: responses to geothermal development in Kenya’s Rift Valley. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 14(2), 165-184, https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2020.1716292.
[13] Abdi, A. M., Murayama, T., Nishikizawa, S., Suwanteep, K., & Mariita, N. O. (2024). Determinants of community acceptance of geothermal energy projects: A case study on a geothermal energy project in Kenya. Renewable Energy Focus, 50, 100594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2024.100594
[14] Abdi, A. M., Murayama, T., Nishikizawa, S., Suwanteep, K., & Mariita, N. O. (n.d.). Social acceptance and associated risks of geothermal energy development in East Africa: Perspectives from geothermal energy developers. Clean Energy, 8(8), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkae051
[15] Van der Horst, D. (2007). NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy policy, 35(5), 2705-2714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012
[16] Devine‐Wright, P. (2011). Public engagement with large‐scale renewable energy technologies: breaking the cycle of NIMBYism. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.89.
[17] Cui, L., Chen, Y., Wang, X., & Liu, S. (2023). Complexity review of NIMBY conflict: Characteristics, mechanism and evolution simulation. Systems, 11(5), 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11050246
[18] Burningham, K., Barnett, J., & Thrush, D. (2006). The limitations of the NIMBY concept for understanding public engagement with renewable energy technologies: a literature. Accessed April, 27. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=c88fd81e9c5dac100e6225708f6763ebb1943c51
[19] Liu, L., Bouman, T., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2019). Effects of trust and public participation on acceptability of renewable energy projects in the Netherlands and China. Energy Research & Social Science, 53, 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.006
[20] Żywiołek, J., Tucmeanu, E. R., Tucmeanu, A. I., Isac, N., & Yousaf, Z. (2022). Nexus of transformational leadership, employee adaptiveness, knowledge sharing, and employee creativity. Sustainability, 14, 11607. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811607
[21] Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., bin Bahruddin, M. A., & Ali, M. (2018). How trust can drive forward the user acceptance to the technology? In-vehicle technology for autonomous vehicle. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 118, 819-836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.019.
[22] Pellizzone, A., Allansdottir, A., De Franco, R., Muttoni, G., & Manzella, A. (2015). Exploring public engagement with geothermal energy in southern Italy: A case study. Energy Policy, 85, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.002
[23] Pellizzone, A., Allansdottir, A., De Franco, R., Muttoni, G., & Manzella, A. (2017). Geothermal energy and the public: A case study on deliberative citizens’ engagement in central Italy. Energy Policy, 101, 561-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.013
[24] Grims, J. M. (2023). Why geothermal energy? A questionnaire-analysis of community acceptance to promote energy justice and sustainable development strategies in rural Argentina. Proceedings of the 48th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, SGP-TR-224, Stanford University, Stanford, California. https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/GeoConf/papers/SGW/2023/Grimes.pdf
[25] Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., bin Bahruddin, M. A., & Ali, M. (2018). How trust can drive forward the user acceptance to the technology? In-vehicle technology for autonomous vehicle. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 118, 819-836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.019.
[26] Kalkbrenner, B. J., & Roosen, J. (2016). Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: The role of community and trust in Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.006
[27] Lienhoop, N. (2018). Acceptance of wind energy and the role of financial and procedural participation: An investigation with focus groups and choice experiments. Energy Policy, 118, 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.063
[28] Anggreta, D. K., Somantri, G. R., & Purwanto, S. A. (2022). Social acceptance: Mapping the perspectives of stakeholders in the development of geothermal power plants in West Sumatra, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(4), 1053-1065. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170402
[29] Trutnevyte, E., & Wiemer, S. (2017). Tailor-made risk governance for induced seismicity of geothermal energy projects: An application to Switzerland. Geothermics, 65, 295-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2016.10.006
[30] Hughes, L., & Rogei, D. (2020). Feeling the heat: Responses to geothermal development in Kenya’s Rift Valley. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 14(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2020.1716292
[31] Gehringer, M., & Loksha, V. (2012). Geothermal Handbook: Planning and Financing Power Generation A Pre-launch. The World Bank Group, Washington, USA, 16-100. https://www.esmap.org/sites/esmap.org/files/Loksha_Gehringer_Geothermal%20Training%20July%202012%20(Day1)_0.pdf
[32] Fichtner. (2012). Etude cadre environnementale et sociale du projet d’évaluation des ressources géothermiques de Djibouti. The World Bank website. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/743681468246003355/pdf/Djibouti1.pdf
[33] Ethiopian Electric Power Corporation. (2013a). Environmental and social impact assessment report of Aluto Langano geothermal site. The World Bank website. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/pt/151581468038142238/pdf/E43920V10P13360Box382090B00PUBLIC0.pdf
[34] Ethiopian Electric Power Corporation. (2013b). Environmental and social impact assessment report of Alalobad Tendaho geothermal project site. The World Bank website. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/496311468257673067/pdf/E43920V20P133600Box382090B00PUBLIC0.pdf
[35] Geothermal Development Company & LOG Associates. (2019). Environmental and social impact assessment for the proposed geothermal drilling project in West Menengai. NEMA Kenya website. https://www.nema.go.ke/images/Docs/EIA_14601469/EIA%201569%20%20Menengai%20West%20Geothermal%20Drilling%20Project%20Report-min.pdf
[36] GIBB Africa. (2009). Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Report (No. E2337V6). The World Bank website. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/zh/932731468048839074/pdf/E23370EA0V60P1030370Box345601B01PUBLIC1.pdf
[37] Sosian Energy & GIBB International. (2019). Updated environmental and social impact assessment report for the development of 1x35 MW geothermal power plant in Menengai. The African Development Bank website. https://esa.afdb.org/sites/default/files/Sosian%20Menengai%20GeothermalUpdated%20ESIA%20Report.pdf
[38] Sosian Energy. (2019). Environmental and social impact assessment study for the proposed geothermal exploration drilling energy Makongenu/Menengai geothermal project. The NEMA-Kenya website. https://www.nema.go.ke/images/Docs/EIA_16701679/ESIA_1671%20Sosian%20Energy%20report%20_SR%201671-min.pdf
[39] Huberman, A. M., Miles, M. B., & De Backer, C. (1991). Analyse des données qualitatives: recueil de nouvelles méthodes (Vol. 480). Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.
[40] Grames, E. M., Stillman, A. N., Tingley, M. W., & Elphick, C. S. (2019). An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co-occurrence networks. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 1645-1654. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13268
[41] Contini, M., Annunziata, E., Rizzi, F., & Frey, M. (2018). Business strategies in geothermal energy market: A citizens-based perspective. In A. Manzella, A. Allansdottir, & A. Pellizzone (Eds.), Geothermal energy and society (pp. 39-53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78286-7_3
[42] Spampatti, T., Hahnel, U. J., Trutnevyte, E., & Brosch, T. (2022). Short and long-term dominance of negative information in shaping public energy perceptions: The case of shallow geothermal systems. Energy Policy, 167, 113070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113070
[43] Cousse, J., Trutnevyte, E., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2021). Tell me how you feel about geothermal energy: Affect as a revealing factor of the role of seismic risk on public acceptance. Energy Policy, 58, 112547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112547
[44] Karytsas, S., & Polyzou, O. (2021). Social acceptance of geothermal power plants. In C. O. Colpan, M. A. Ezan, & O. Kizilkan (Eds.), Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of geothermal power plants (pp. 65-79). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821037-6.00004-4
[45] Prats, M., S. Smid and M. Ferrin. (2024). Lack of trust in institutions and political engagement: An analysis based on the 2021 OECD Trust Survey, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 75, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/83351a47-en.