Prioritizing Sustainable Technological Solutions for Zero-Energy Buildings in Semi-Temperate Mountainous Climates Based on Technology Transfer Criteria
Main Article Content
Abstract
In cold-mountainous climates, buildings face significant heating demands and complex environmental challenges that hinder the achievement of net-zero energy performance. This study presents a dual-focused framework integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods—Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)—with technology-transfer criteria to evaluate and prioritize thirty sustainable technological solutions across three categories: building envelope, mechanical systems, and energy management. The framework emphasizes cost-effectiveness, technical maturity, and local compatibility to ensure practical applicability. Case-study comparisons from Turkey, Canada, and Switzerland demonstrate the transferability of optimized technological solutions. Results reveal that advanced high-performance insulation, dynamic glazing, and hybrid photovoltaic-thermal systems rank highest in combined energy savings and transfer potential. The proposed decision-support model offers policymakers and practitioners a robust tool for adapting global best practices to diverse cold-mountainous regions, contributing to the accelerated adoption of net-zero energy buildings worldwide.
Article Details
Articles published in International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management are following the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivs (by-nc-nd). Further information about Creative Commons
Authors can archive post-print (final draft post-refereering) on personal websites or institutional repositories under these conditions:
- Publishers version cannot be stored elsewhere but on publishers homepage
- Published source must be acknowledged
- Must link to publisher version
References
[1] Wang Z, Wang L, and Malkawi A. Modeling the long-term energy and environmental benefits of net-zero buildings in cold climates: A case study of a multi-family residential building in Canada. Applied Energy 341, 120909, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120909
[2] Jafari A, Valentin V. Framework for performance evaluation of ZEBs using climate-based indicators. Energy and Buildings 268, 112222, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112222
[3] Papadopoulos S, Azar E, Woon WL, Kontokosta, CE. Integrating topographical variables into ZEB design for mountainous regions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 152, 111678, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111678
[4] Sartori A, Liu Z, Mahbub MS, Pilati F, Brunelli M, Viesi D. Optimizing the integration of renewable energy sources, energy efficiency, and flexibility solutions in a multi-network pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 41, 87–107, 2024, http://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.8167
[5] Leeuwen R.van, Wit J.B.de, Smit GJ. Energy scheduling model to optimize transition routes towards 100% renewable urban districts. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 13(3), 19–46, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2017.13.3
[6] Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences 1, 1, 83–98, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSci.2008.017590
[7] Perinhas SM.de O, Sousa JAM.de, Viveiros, C.S.P.C, Barata FA.de SF. Techno-economic assessment of battery energy storage systems in renewable energy communities. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 44, 59–72, 2025, https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.9290
[8] Osorio-Aravena JC, Aghahosseini A, Bogdanov D, Caldera U, Muñoz-Cerón E, Breyer C. The role of solar PV, wind energy, and storage technologies in the transition toward a fully sustainable energy system in Chile by 2050 across power, heat, transport and desalination sectors. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 25, 77–94.2020 https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.3385
[9] Divkovic D, Knorr L, Meschede H. Design approach to extend and decarbonize existing district heating systems - case study for German cities. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 38, 141–156, 2023, http://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.7655
[10] Viesi D, Mahbub MS, Brandi A, Thellufsen JZ, Østergaard PA, Lund H, Baratieri M, L. Multi-objective optimization of an energy community: an integrated and dynamic approach for full decarbonization in the European Alps. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 38, 8–29. 2025 https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.7607
[11] Gohari S, Larssæther S. Sustainable Energy Planning as a co-creative governance challenge. Lessons from the Zero Village Bergen. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 24.2019 http://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.3353
[12] Li L, Kumar R. Ranking passive design measures for nearly zero-energy buildings in subtropical climates using AHP–TOPSIS. Sustainable Cities and Society 64, 102527, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102527
[13] Ascione F, Bianco N, De Masi RF, Vanoli GP. Energy retrofit of educational buildings: Transient energy simulations, model calibration and multi-objective optimization towards nearly zero-energy performance. Energy and Buildings 144, 303–319, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.056
[14] Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1981. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
[15] Rezaei J, Fallah Lajimi H. A robust AHP–TOPSIS model for energy strategy evaluation under uncertainty. Energy Policy 149, 112016, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112016
[16] Zhang Y, Ren J, Pu Y, Wang P. Solar energy potential assessment: A framework to integrate geographic, technological, and economic indices for a potential analysis. Renewable Energy 149, 577–586, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.048
[17] Zhang Y, Hsu CC. What role do emission trading schemes, energy innovation, and technology transfer play in sustainable recovery? A perspective from BRICS economies. Geoscience Frontiers 101778, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101778
[18] Wang, X, Li Y, Zhang J, Liu H. Design and transient analysis of renewable energy-based residential net-zero energy buildings with energy storage. Renewable Energy 220, 119512, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119512
[19] Zhang W, Deng M, Xiong Q. Evaluation of energy performance in positive energy building: X HOUSE at Solar Decathlon Middle East 2021. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 192, 114163, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114163
[20] Abdou, NEl, Mghouchi Y, Hamdaoui S, Hajjaji A. Multi-objective optimization of passive energy efficiency measures for net-zero energy buildings in Morocco. Building and Environment 204, 108141, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108141
[21] Acar S, Yeldan AE, Kumbaroğlu G. Transforming Türkiye’s power system: An assessment of economic, social, and external impacts of an energy transition by 2030. Clean Energy Systems 4, 100064, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cles.2023.100064
[22] AI–Ali S. Developing countries and technology transfer. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 10, 7–8, 704–713, 1995. https://www.inderscience.com/jhome.php?jcode=ijtm
[23] Ajmera P. Ranking the strategies for the Indian medical tourism sector through the integration of SWOT analysis and TOPSIS method. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 30, 8, 668–679, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2016-0101
[24] Alam MH. A review article of net zero energy building construction in Bihar. Int. Res. J. Mod. Eng. Technol. Sci 6, 1, 2024. https://www.irjmets.com/
[25] Amada K, Shimoda Y, Mizuno M, Kondo T. Feasibility of staying at home in a net-zero energy house during summer power outages. Energy and Buildings 273, 112352, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112352
[26] Aruta G, Ascione F, De Masi RF, Vanoli GP. Optimizing the energy transition of social housing to a renewable, nearly zero-energy community: The goal of sustainability. Energy and Buildings 282, 112798, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112798
[27] Assadpourkalboland N, Hasheminejad SM. Modeling the impact of risks on the success of oil and gas industry projects. SSRN 4719535 2024, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4719535
[28] Belussi L, Barozzi B, Bellazzi A, Danza L, Devitofrancesco A, Fanciulli C, Salamone F. A review of the performance of zero energy buildings and energy efficiency solutions. Journal of Building Engineering 25, 100772, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100772
[29] Cabeza LF, Chàfer M. Technological options and technological solutions towards zero energy buildings contributing to climate change mitigation: A systematic review. Energy and Buildings 219, 110009, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110009
[30] Carlucci S, Causone F, De Rosa M, Pagliano L. Zero-energy living lab. in Smart Energy Control Systems for Sustainable Buildings. Springer, Cham 1–35, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52076-6_1
[31] Christopher S, Kousksou T, Jamil A, Zeraouli Y. Renewable energy potential towards attainment of net-zero energy buildings status – A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production 136942, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136942
[32] da Silva VL, Kovaleski JL, Pagani RN. Fundamental elements in technology transfer: An in-depth analysis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 34, 2, 223–244, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1898308
[33] Davydiuk O, Koval V, Mikhno I. Identifying directions for improving means of technology transfer safety regulation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies 125(13), 2023. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.290116
[34] D'Agostino D, Tsemekidi Tzeiranaki S, Zangheri P, Bertoldi P. Assessing nearly zero energy buildings (NZEBs) development in Europe. Energy Strategy Reviews 36, 100681, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100681
[35] Ebrahimi-Moghadam A, Farzaneh-Gord M. A sustainable optimal biomass waste-driven CCHP system to boost the nearly zero energy building concept. Energy Conversion and Management 277, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116663
[36] Farhadikhah Z, Husseini SMH. A review of methods and models of technology transfer. International Letters on Social and Humanistic Sciences 62, 173–181, 2015. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.62.173
[37] Gibbons L, Javed S. A review of HVAC solution-sets and energy performance of nearly zero-energy multi-story apartment buildings in Nordic climates by statistical analysis of environmental performance certificates and literature review. Energy 238, 121709, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121709
[38] Guo F, Wang J, Song Y. Reducing carbon emissions in prefabricated buildings supply chains: A focus on component manufacturing processes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 31, 23, 34507–34525, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33345-6
[39] Heidari S, Mahmoudi A, Emrouznejad A. Identifying and prioritizing supply chain sustainability indicators for perishable products via grounded theory and fuzzy hierarchical analysis approach. Journal of Systems Management 7(1), 233–264, 2021, https://doi.org/10.30495/jsm.2021.1919814.1427
[40] Ilham N I, Hassan M Y, Ariffin J, Baharudin A, Hashim H. Prospects and challenges of Malaysia’s distributed energy resources in business models towards zero-carbon emission and energy security. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development 11(4), 2022, https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2022.45008
[41] Jaysawal R K, Chakraborty S, Elangovan D, Padmanaban S. Concept of net zero energy buildings (NZEB) – A literature review. Clean Engineering Technology, 11, 100582, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100582
[42] Li J, Yu Q, Ma D. Does China’s high-speed rail network promote inter-city technology transfer? A multilevel network analysis based on the electronic information industry. Transportation Policy 145, 11–24, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.12.008
[43] Zhang X, Li Y, Chen Z. A technology-transfer index for assessing replicability of ZEB strategies. Energy Efficiency 15, 4, 643–659, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-022-10027-1
[44] Garcia P, Müller F, Svensson T. Passive solar strategies and thermal mass in mountainous ZEBs: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 165, 112445, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112445
[45] Lund H, Østergaard PA, Connolly D, Mathiesen BV. Smart energy and smart energy systems. Energy 137, 556–565, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.123
[46] Nemet GF. How solar energy became cheap: A model for low-carbon innovation. Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429027628