A multi-fuel pathway explorer tool for evaluating sustainable alternative fuels for the maritime sector

Main Article Content

Jana Reiter
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6888-5739
Christoph Hoefer
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9396-4404
Jasmin Pfleger
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5065-1375
Wolfgang Gruber-Glatzl
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8707-7109

Abstract

In the maritime sector, sustainable alternative fuels derived from biological and non-biological origin such as hydrogen, ammonia, and methanol show high potential for novel propulsion technologies such as solid oxide fuel cells. Since transitioning to new fuels may require high investments, decision-makers and local municipalities need a systematic approach to identify the most relevant fuel pathways for their prerequisites. However, a modelling approach including fuel production, transport, demand, time-resolved supply rates for testing and comparing sustainable alternative fuels is still lacking.


Here, a Python library called multi-fuel pathway explorer (MFPE) was developed, for fuel-cell applications in the maritime sector. The library offers the possibility of rapid screening and modelling of high-potential pathways depending on the constituents of the target port environment, allowing for in-depth evaluation of technical details compared to commonly applied life-cycle assessment (LCA) or techno-economical assessment (TEA) tools.


For demonstration, a case study was set up at the port of Rotterdam to evaluate fuel pathways by calculation of selected key performance indicators (KPIs). Results demonstrate that the model is applicable on complex multi-fuel systems to compare fuel pathways, identify system-level bottlenecks, and analyse time-resolved dependencies between fuel demand and supply along the pathway.

Article Details

How to Cite
Reiter , J., Hoefer, C., Pfleger, J., & Gruber-Glatzl, W. (2026). A multi-fuel pathway explorer tool for evaluating sustainable alternative fuels for the maritime sector. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 49, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.11207
Section
Articles

References

[1] Z. H. Munim, M. M. H. Chowdhury, H. M. Tusher, and T. Notteboom, ‘Towards a prioritization of alternative energy sources for sustainable shipping’, Mar. Policy, vol. 152, p. 105579, Jun. 2023, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105579.

[2] International Maritime Organization, ‘Symposium on alternative low-carbon and zero-carbon fuels - 9 and 10 February 2021’. Accessed: Apr. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.imo.org/en/About/Events/Pages/Symposium-alternative-low-carbon-and-zero-carbon-fuels.aspx

[3] F. Harahap, A. Nurdiawati, D. Conti, S. Leduc, and F. Urban, ‘Renewable marine fuel production for decarbonised maritime shipping: Pathways, policy measures and transition dynamics’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 415, p. 137906, Aug. 2023, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137906.

[4] N. L. Trivyza, A. Rentizelas, G. Theotokatos, and E. Boulougouris, ‘Decision support methods for sustainable ship energy systems: A state-of-the-art review’, Energy, vol. 239, p. 122288, Jan. 2022, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122288.

[5] European Parliament, Regulation (EU) 2023/1805 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009/16/EC (Text with EEA relevance), vol. 234. 2023. Accessed: Apr. 15, 2026. [Online]. Available: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1805/oj

[6] B. Van Veldhuizen, L. Van Biert, P. V. Aravind, and K. Visser, ‘Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Marine Applications’, Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 2023, pp. 1–35, May 2023, http://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5163448.

[7] Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast) (Text with EEA relevance). 2024. Accessed: Apr. 16, 2026. [Online]. Available: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/2001/2024-07-16

[8] M. Pfenning, M. Von Bonin, and N. Gerhardt, ‘PTX-ATLAS: WELTWEITE POTENZIALE FÜR DIE ERZEUGUNG VON GRÜNEM WASSERSTOFF UND KLIMANEUTRALEN SYNTHETISCHEN KRAFT- UND BRENNSTOFFEN’, Fraunhofer-Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Energiesystemtechnik (Fraunhofer IEE), 2021. Accessed: Sep. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iee.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/iee/energiesystemtechnik/de/Dokumente/Veroeffentlichungen/FraunhoferIEE-PtX-Atlas_Hintergrundpapier_final.pdf

[9] H. Tian, J. Li, M. Yan, Y. W. Tong, C.-H. Wang, and X. Wang, ‘Organic waste to biohydrogen: A critical review from technological development and environmental impact analysis perspective’, Appl. Energy, vol. 256, p. 113961, Dec. 2019, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113961.

[10] D. R. MacFarlane et al., ‘A Roadmap to the Ammonia Economy’, Joule, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1186–1205, Jun. 2020, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.04.004.

[11] S. Sollai, A. Porcu, V. Tola, F. Ferrara, and A. Pettinau, ‘Renewable methanol production from green hydrogen and captured CO2: A techno-economic assessment’, J. CO2 Util., vol. 68, p. 102345, Feb. 2023, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102345.

[12] F. M. Baena-Moreno, L. Pastor-Pérez, Q. Wang, and T. R. Reina, ‘Bio-methane and bio-methanol co-production from biogas: A profitability analysis to explore new sustainable chemical processes’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 265, p. 121909, Aug. 2020, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121909.

[13] K. Askeland, B. Johnsen Rygg, and K. Sperling, ‘The role of 4th generation district heating (4GDH) in a highly electrified hydropower dominated energy system’, Int. J. Sustain. Energy Plan. Manag., pp. 17-34 Pages, Mar. 2020, http://doi.org/10.5278/IJSEPM.3683.

[14] M. G. Prina et al., ‘Smart energy systems applied at urban level: the case of the municipality of Bressanone-Brixen’, Int. J. Sustain. Energy Plan. Manag., pp. 33-52 Pages, Jun. 2016, http://doi.org/10.5278/IJSEPM.2016.10.4.

[15] A. Volkova, A. Hlebnikov, A. Ledvanov, T. Kirs, U. Raudsepp, and E. Latõšov, ‘District Cooling Network Planning. A Case Study of Tallinn’, Int. J. Sustain. Energy Plan. Manag., vol. 34, pp. 63–78, May 2022, http://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.7011.

[16] C. D. Scown, N. R. Baral, M. Yang, N. Vora, and T. Huntington, ‘Technoeconomic analysis for biofuels and bioproducts’, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., vol. 67, pp. 58–64, Feb. 2021, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.01.002.

[17] G. M. Kopanos, P. Liu, and M. C. Georgiadis, Eds, Advances in Energy Systems Engineering. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42803-1.

[18] J.-D. Caprace, C. H. Marques, L. F. Assis, A. Lucchesi, and P. C. Pereda, ‘Sustainable Shipping: Modeling Technological Pathways Toward Net-Zero Emissions in Maritime Transport (Part I)’, Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 8, p. 3733, Apr. 2025, http://doi.org/10.3390/su17083733.

[19] A. Al-Enazi, Y. Bicer, E. C. Okonkwo, and T. Al-Ansari, ‘Evaluating the utilisation of clean fuels in maritime applications: A techno-economic supply chain optimization’, Fuel, vol. 322, p. 124195, Aug. 2022, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124195.

[20] ‘HySupply Cost Tool’, GlobH2E. Accessed: Apr. 18, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.globh2e.org.au/hysupply-cost-tool

[21] Aspen Technology, ‘Aspen Plus | Leading Process Simulation Software | AspenTech’, Aspen Plus | Leading Process Simulation Software | AspenTech. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.aspentech.com/en/products/engineering/aspen-plus

[22] UL Solutions LLC., ‘HOMER - Hybrid Renewable and Distributed Generation System Design Software’, HOMER - Hybrid Renewable and Distributed Generation System Design Software. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.homerenergy.com/

[23] L. Law, B. Foscoli, E. Mastorakos, and S. Evans, ‘A Comparison of Alternative Fuels for Shipping in Terms of Lifecycle Energy and Cost’, Energies, vol. 14, no. 24, p. 8502, Dec. 2021, http://doi.org/10.3390/en14248502.

[24] Energy Systems and Infrastructure Assessment and Argonne National Laboratory, ‘Argonne GREET R&D Model’, Argonne GREET R&D Model. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://greet.anl.gov/

[25] Lloyd’s Register Group Services Limited, ‘Zero Carbon Fuel Monitor - Assessment method’, Lloyd’s Register. Accessed: Apr. 01, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.lr.org/en/knowledge/research/zcfm/assessment-method/

[26] Mark Stark, ‘Green Corridors Cost Model’, Zero Carbon Shipping. Accessed: Apr. 01, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.zerocarbonshipping.com/green-corridors/cost-co2-calculations

[27] Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping, ‘The Center Launches the Fuel Cost Calculator’. [Online]. Available: https://www.zerocarbonshipping.com/news/the-center-launches-the-fuel-cost-calculator

[28] J. Martin, A. Neumann, and A. Ødegård, ‘Renewable hydrogen and synthetic fuels versus fossil fuels for trucking, shipping and aviation: A holistic cost model’, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 186, p. 113637, Oct. 2023, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113637.

[29] J. Hampp, M. Düren, and T. Brown, ‘Import options for chemical energy carriers from renewable sources to Germany’, PLOS ONE, vol. 18, no. 2, p. e0262340, Feb. 2023, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281380.

[30] C. Höfer et al., ‘D1.2 “B: Technology concept design for a multifuel SOFC system including final report on specifications of suitable green fuels and qualities for SOFC”’, AEE INTEC, WUT, Deliverable, Aug. 2024. Available: https://fuelsome.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/FuelSOME-D1.2-B-Techn_AEE-310824-v0.7.pdf.

[31] Python Software Foundation, Python. (2021). [Online]. Available: https://www.python.org/

[32] Port of Rotterdam Authority, ‘Highlights Annual Report 2024’, Port of Rotterdam Authority, Annual Report 2024. [Online]. Available: https://reporting.portofrotterdam.com

[33] ‘Salzkaverne als Wasserstoffspeicher’. Accessed: Jul. 11, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.ees-europe.com/neuigkeiten/news/salzkaverne-als-wasserstoffspeicher

[34] C. Murray, ‘Green hydrogen and energy storage: 26 million kg Netherlands salt cavern and BESS-paired electrolyser in India’, Energy-Storage.News. Accessed: Jul. 11, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.energy-storage.news/green-hydrogen-and-energy-storage-26-million-kg-netherlands-salt-cavern-and-bess-paired-electrolyser-in-india/

[35] ‘JRC Photovoltaic Geographical Information System (PVGIS) - European Commission’. Accessed: Jul. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvg_tools/en/

[36] S. Di Micco, L. Mastropasqua, V. Cigolotti, M. Minutillo, and J. Brouwer, ‘A framework for the replacement analysis of a hydrogen-based polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell technology on board ships: A step towards decarbonization in the maritime sector’, Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 267, p. 115893, Sep. 2022, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115893.

[37] S. Y. W. Chai, F. J. F. Phang, L. S. Yeo, L. H. Ngu, and B. S. How, ‘Future era of techno-economic analysis: Insights from review’, Front. Sustain., vol. 3, p. 924047, Aug. 2022, http://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.924047.

[38] Jana Reiter, Christoph Hoefer, Jasmin Pfleger, and Wolfgang Gruber-Glatzl, Multi-Fuel Pathway Explorer (MFPE). (Feb. 27, 2026). Python. AEE INTEC, Gleisdorf. [Online]. Available: https://gitlab.com/multi-fuel-pathway-explorer/mfpe

[39] J. Reiter, C. Hoefer, and W. Gruber-Glatzl, ‘D1.4 B: Report on multi fuel supply chain modelling (in progress)’, AEE INTEC, Deliverable, 2026.

[40] A. Hagberg, P. Swart, and D. Chult, ‘Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function Using NetworkX’, presented at the Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference, Jan. 2008. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.25080/TCWV9851

[41] T. pandas development team, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas. (Jul. 07, 2025). Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15831829.

[42] C. Howe, ‘World’s biggest solar farm comes online in China’s Xinjiang’, Reuters, Jun. 07, 2024. Accessed: Apr. 21, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.reuters.com/world/china/worlds-biggest-solar-farm-comes-online-chinas-xinjiang-2024-06-03/

[43] Eric Arets, Jan Peter Lesschen, Bas Lerink, Mart-Jan Schelhaas, and Chantal Hendriks, ‘Information on LULUCF actions, The Netherlands’, Wageningen Environmental Research, Dec. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://edepot.wur.nl/538892

[44] Eurostat, ‘Generation and discharge of wastewater in volume’. Eurostat, 2022. http://doi.org/10.2908/ENV_WW_GENV.

[45] P. A. Østergaard, H. Lund, J. Z. Thellufsen, P. Sorknæs, and B. V. Mathiesen, ‘Review and validation of EnergyPLAN’, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 168, p. 112724, Oct. 2022, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112724.

[46] J. C. Refsgaard and H. J. Henriksen, ‘Modelling guidelines––terminology and guiding principles’, Adv. Water Resour., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 71–82, Jan. 2004, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.08.006.

[47] V. Cigolotti, M. Genovese, and P. Fragiacomo, ‘Comprehensive Review on Fuel Cell Technology for Stationary Applications as Sustainable and Efficient Poly-Generation Energy Systems’, Energies, vol. 14, no. 16, p. 4963, Aug. 2021, http://doi.org/10.3390/en14164963.

[48] D. Roy, S. Samanta, S. Roy, A. Smallbone, and A. P. Roskilly, ‘Techno-economic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell-based energy systems for decarbonising residential power and heat in the United Kingdom’, Green Chem., vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 3979–3994, 2024, http://doi.org/10.1039/D3GC02645K.

[49] K. H. M. Al-Hamed and I. Dincer, ‘A novel integrated solid-oxide fuel cell powering system for clean rail applications’, Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 205, p. 112327, Feb. 2020, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112327.

[50] Y. Zhang et al., ‘Particle swarm optimization for a hybrid freight train powered by hydrogen or ammonia solid oxide fuel cells’, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, vol. 72, pp. 626–641, Jun. 2024, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.347.

[51] Federal Office for the Environment, ‘Database of the Swiss Federal Administration, BAFU:2025’. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://nexus.openlca.org/database/BAFU