Modeling the Baltic countries’ Green Transition and Desynchronization from the Russian Electricity Grid

Main Article Content

Nelli Putkonen
Tomi J. Lindroos
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1258-6750
Eimantas Neniškis
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4361-2798
Diāna Žalostība
Egidijus Norvaiša
Arvydas Galinis
Jana Teremranova
Juha Kiviluoma
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1299-9056

Abstract

In the next ten years, the Baltic countries ― Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania ― are planning large investments in renewable power generation and transfer capacity, substantial phase-out of fossil-based power generation, and desynchronization from the Russian electricity grid. In this article, the operational impacts of these changes on the Baltic energy system from 2017 to 2030 are studied with an open-source Backbone energy system model. The operation of Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian power and heat, transport, and building sectors are optimized simultaneously on an hourly level, and results are analysed with operational, environmental, economic, and security indicators.


 


Results suggest that the planned transition would support Baltic targets in renewable generation (from 45% to 92%) and self-reliance (2.3 TWh increase in domestic power generation and 5.5 TWh decrease in natural gas imports) with a moderate impact on system costs. However, an increase in transport CO2 emissions could risk national non-ETS targets. The hourly operation of the system, with a high share of wind and solar, is based on active use of storages and interconnectors. Model results raise concerns about the amount of Estonian dispatchable capacity, the commercial feasibility of Latvian natural gas CHP’s, and the high ramping rates of Lithuanian interconnectors.

Article Details

How to Cite
Putkonen, N., Lindroos, T., Neniškis, E. ., Žalostība, D. ., Norvaiša, E. ., Galinis, A. ., Teremranova, J. ., & Kiviluoma, J. . (2022). Modeling the Baltic countries’ Green Transition and Desynchronization from the Russian Electricity Grid. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 34, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.7059
Section
Articles