Energy Transition Readiness: A Practical Guide
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper addresses the challenge of assessing Energy Transition Readiness levels in businesses. It identifies gaps in existing literature concerning energy transitions and readiness levels. To tackle this, the paper employs organizational learning theory as its foundational model and introduces a new taxonomy of key energy readiness indicators. This taxonomy offers a practical guide for business professionals to implement targeted interventions effectively. Additionally, it enables benchmarking and comparison of sector and industry actors. In summary, the integration of organizational learning theory expands the discourse on strategically managing global challenges.
Article Details
Articles published in International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management are following the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivs (by-nc-nd). Further information about Creative Commons
Authors can archive post-print (final draft post-refereering) on personal websites or institutional repositories under these conditions:
- Publishers version cannot be stored elsewhere but on publishers homepage
- Published source must be acknowledged
- Must link to publisher version
References
Østergaard PA, Maestosi PC. Tools, technologies and systems integration for the smart and sustainable cities to come. Int J Sustain Energy Plan Manag. 2019 Nov;24:1–6. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.3405
Porter S Tuff G, Hardin K. Energy transition: Building the framework for the future of energy, Deloitte US available at: . The Future of Energy Transition | Deloitte US
Kemp-Benedict E. Investing in a green transition. Ecol Econ. 2018;153:218–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.012
Roberts C, Geels FW. Conditions and intervention strategies for the deliberate acceleration of socio-technical transitions: lessons from a comparative multi-level analysis of two historical case studies in Dutch and Danish heating. Technol Anal Strat Manag. 2019;31(9):1081–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1584286
Chlebna C, Mattes J. The fragility of regional energy transitions. Env Innov Soc Transit. 2020;37:66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.07.009
Szép T, Pálvölgyi T, Kármán-Tamus É. Indicator-based assessment of sustainable energy performance in the European Union. Int J Sustain Energy Plan Manag. 2022 May;34:107–24. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.7055
Roberts C, Geels FW, Lockwood M, Newell P, Schmitz H, Turnheim B, et al. The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: Towards a new research agenda. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2018;44:304–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1584286
Lee J, Yang JS. Global energy transitions and political systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2019;115(109370):109370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109370
Kern F, Smith A. Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy. 2008;36(11):4093–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.018
Fleiter T, Rehfeldt M, Herbst A, Elsland R, Klingler AL, Manz P, et al. A methodology for bottom-up modelling of energy transitions in the industry sector: The FORECAST model. Energy Strat Rev. 2018;22:237–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2018.09.005
Toktarova A, Karlsson I, Rootzén J, Göransson L, Odenberger M, Johnsson F. Pathways for low-carbon transition of the steel industry—A Swedish case study. Energies. 2020;13(15):3840. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153840
Arens M, Åhman M, Vogl V. Which countries are prepared to green their coal-based steel industry with electricity?-Reviewing climate and energy policy as well as the implementation of renewable electricity. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110938
Markard J, Geels FW, Raven R. Challenges in the acceleration of sustainability transitions. Env Res Lett. 2020;15(8):081001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9468
Hoogma R, Weber M, Elzen B. Integrated long-term strategies to induce regime shifts towards sustainability: the approach of strategic niche management. Towards environmental innovation systems. 2005;209–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27298-4_12
Williams S, Robinson J. Measuring sustainability: An evaluation framework for sustainability transition experiments. Env Sci Policy. 2020;103:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.012
van Dijk J, Wieczorek AJ, Ligtvoet A. Regional capacity to govern the energy transition: The case of two Dutch energy regions. Env Innov Soc Transit. 2022;44:92–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.06.001
Zhang J, Lucia LD. A transition perspective on alternatives to coal in Chinese district heating. Int J Sustain Energy Plan Manag. 2015;6:49–68. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2015.6.5
Nwanekezie K, Noble B, Poelzer G. Transitions-based strategic environmental assessment. Env Impact Assess Rev. 2021;91(106643):106643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106643
Nwanekezie K, Noble B, Poelzer G. Strategic assessment for energy transitions: A case study of renewable energy development in Saskatchewan, Canada. Env Impact Assess Rev. 2022;92(106688):106688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106688
Loorbach D, Wijsman K. Business transition management: exploring a new role for business in sustainability transitions. J Clean Prod. 2013;45:20–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.002
Sousa, M., Almeida, M. F., & Calili, R. ). Multiple criteria decision making for the achievement of the UN sustainable development goals: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Sustainability. 2021;13(8):4129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084129
Verbeke A, Fariborzi H. Managerial governance adaptation in the multinational enterprise: In honour of Mira Wilkins. J Int Bus Stud. 2019;50(8):1213–30. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00251-7
Sabidussi A. Pantha Rei, The Power of Transitions. ISBN 978-94-6167-450-0; 2021. ava210159_lectorale-rede_online.pdf (avans.nl)
Elavarasan RM, Pugazhendhi R, Irfan M, Mihet-Popa L, Campana PE, Khan IA. A novel Sustainable Development Goal 7 composite index as the paradigm for energy sustainability assessment: A case study from Europe. Eur Appl Energy. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118173
Neofytou H, Nikas A, Doukas H. Sustainable energy transition readiness: A multicriteria assessment index. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;131(109988):109988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109988
Bocca, R., Ashraf, M. Fostering Effective Energy Transition 2022 [Internet]. World Economic Forum; 2022. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/reports/fostering-effective-energy-transition-2022/in-full
Luca ED, Zini A, Amerighi O, Coletta G, Oteri MG, Giuffrida LG, et al. A technology evaluation method for assessing the potential contribution of energy technologies to decarbonisation of the Italian production system. Int J Sustain Energy Plan Manag. 2020 Sep;29:41–56. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.4433
Engel DW, Dalton AC, Anderson KK, Sivaramakrishnan C, Lansing C. Development of technology readiness level (TRL) metrics and risk measures (No. PNNL-21737). Richland, WA (United States; 2012. pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-21737.pdf
Kobos PH, Malczynski LA, Walker LTN, Borns DJ, Klise GT. Timing is everything: A technology transition framework for regulatory and market readiness levels. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2018;137:211–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.052
Vik, J., Melås, A. M., Stræte, E. P., & Søraa, R. A. Balanced readiness level assessment (BRLa): A tool for exploring new and emerging technologies. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;169(120854). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084129
Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage. 1991;17(1):99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
March JG. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci. 1991;2(1):71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manage J. 1997;18(7):509–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::aid-smj882>3.0.co;2-z
Barney J, Wright M, Ketchen DJ Jr. The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. J Manage. 2001;27(6):625–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700601
Teece D, Peteraf M, Leih S. Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. Calif Manage Rev. 2016;58(4):13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
Walter AT. Organizational Agility ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systemic literature review and conceptualization. Manag Rev Q. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00186-6
Brown, J. L., Agnew, N. McK. Corporate agility. Bus Horiz. 1982;25(2):29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(82)90101-X
Cortez MAA, Nugroho KMU. Resource-based view or slack availability of resources: A perception survey of Japanese automotive & electronics companies. J Int Bus Res. 2011;10(3):1–17. JIBR_Vol_10_SI_No_3_2011_p_1-17-libre.pdf (d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net)
Biresselioglu ME, Demir MH, Demirbag Kaplan M, Solak B. Individuals, collectives, and energy transition: Analysing the motivators and barriers of European decarbonisation. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020;66(101493):101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101493
Näslund B. Organizational slack. Ekon Tidskr. 1964;1:26–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/3438856
Leonhardt R, Noble B, Poelzer G, Fitzpatrick P, Belcher K, Holdmann G. Advancing local energy transitions: A global review of government instruments supporting community energy. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2022;83(102350):102350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102350
Bray R, Mejía Montero A, Ford R. Skills deployment for a `just’ net zero energy transition. Env Innov Soc Transit. 2022;42:395–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.02.002
Kemfert C, Präger F, Braunger I, Hoffart FM, Brauers H. The expansion of natural gas infrastructure puts energy transitions at risk. Nat Energy. 2022;7(7):582–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01060-3
Bolwig S, Bazbauers G, Klitkou A, Lund PD, Blumberga A, Gravelsins A, et al. Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2019;101:440–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.019
Pollitt MG. The role of policy in energy transitions: Lessons from the energy liberalisation era. Energy Policy. 2012;50:128–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.004
Aaker DA. How to select a business strategy. Calif Manage Rev. 1984;26(3):167–75.https://doi.org/10.2307/41165087
Merabet A, Al-Durra A, El-Saadany EF. Energy management system for optimal cost and storage utilization of renewable hybrid energy microgrid. Energy Convers Manag. 2022;252(115116):115116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115116
Saeed, M. A., & Kersten, W. Drivers of sustainable supply chain management: identification and classification. 2019;11(4):1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041137
Freeman R. Strategic management: A stakeholder theory. J Manag Stud. 1984;39(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
Sorman AH, García-Muros X, Pizarro-Irizar C, González-Eguino M. Lost (and found) in Transition: Expert stakeholder insights on low-carbon energy transitions in Spain. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020;64(101414):101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101414
Freudenreich B, Lüdeke-Freund F, Schaltegger S. A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. J Bus Ethics. 2020;166(1):3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z
Daugaard D, Ding A. Global drivers for ESG performance: The body of knowledge. Sustainability. 2022;14(4):2322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042322
Iamandi IE, Constantin LG, Munteanu SM, Cernat-Gruici B. Mapping the ESG behavior of European companies. A holistic Kohonen approach. Sustainability. 2019;11(12):3276. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123276
Malesios C, De D, Moursellas A, Dey PK, Evangelinos K. Sustainability performance analysis of small and medium sized enterprises: Criteria, methods and framework. Socioecon Plann Sci. 2021;75(100993):100993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100993
Aaker DA, Mascarenhas B. The need for strategic flexibility. J Bus Strategy. 1984;5(2):74–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039060
Sabidussi A, Lokshin B, Duysters G. The innovator’s dilemma: the performance consequences of sequential or flexible exploration and exploitation patterns in turbulent environments. Technol Anal Strat Manag. 2021;1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1975033
Bohnsack R, Ciulli F, Kolk A. The role of business models in firm internationalization: An exploration of European electricity firms in the context of the energy transition. J Int Bus Stud. 2021;52(5):824–52.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00364-4
Araújo K. The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2014;1:112–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.002
Engel-Cox JA, Wikoff HM, Reese SB. Techno‐economic, environmental, and social measurement of clean energy technology supply chains. J Adv Manuf Process. 2022;4(3). pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-21737.pdf
Ahmed MU, Shafiq A. Toward sustainable supply chains: impact of buyer’s legitimacy, power and aligned focus on supplier sustainability performance. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2022;42(3):280–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-08-2021-0540
Naidoo M, Gasparatos A. Corporate environmental sustainability in the retail sector: Drivers, strategies and performance measurement. J Clean Prod. 2018;203:125–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.253
Govindan K, Shaw M, Majumdar A. Social sustainability tensions in multi-tier supply chain: A systematic literature review towards conceptual framework development. J Clean Prod. 2021;279(123075):123075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123075
Duysters G, Lavie D, Sabidussi A, Stettner U. What drives exploration? Convergence and divergence of exploration tendencies among alliance partners and competitors. Acad Manage J. 2020;63(5):1425–54. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1409
Bhandari KR, Ranta M, Salo J. The resource‐based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm’s embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance. Bus Strat Env. 2022;31(4):1525–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2967
.
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q. 1990;35(1):128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Unruh GC. Understanding carbon lock-in. Vol. 28, Energy Policy.2000 p. 817-830.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00070-7
Unruh GC. Escaping carbon lock-in. Vol. 30, Energy Policy. 2002 p. 317–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00098-2
Quinn RE, Rohrbaugh J. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Manage Sci. 1983;29(3):363–77. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363