Drivers of the Sustainability Performance of Induction Stove Conversion Program in Indonesia

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jan 17, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.8414
Keywords:
Energy transition, Electricity, Clean energy, Induction cooker, Correlation model

Main Article Content

Dr. Retno Wulan Damayanti
Universitas Sebelas Maret
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5779-3337
Silvia Dhea Safira, ST
Universitas Sebelas Maret
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5083-6232
Dr. Pringgo Widyo Laksono
Universitas Sebelas Maret
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0502-5453
Haryono Setiadi, ST.,MEng
Universitas Sebelas Maret
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6394-0548
Nisa Aqilla Ellenahaya Entifar, ST
Pukyong National University
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-5350

Abstract

In 2022, Indonesia initiated a pilot project to transition from liquid petroleum gas (LPG) stoves to induction stoves, targeting 8.2 million households by 2025. While LPG is considered a clean cooking fuel by the World Health Organization due to its low PM2.5 emissions, this program aims to further reduce CO2 emissions from cooking activities, aligning with Indonesia's clean energy transition and 2060 Net Zero Emission goals. Throughout the program, doubts and criticisms arose among various sectors of society, particularly concerning the sustainability of this program. This research aims to determine and analyze the driving factors that support the sustainability of the induction stove transition program. Five sustainability aspects, namely, economic, social, environmental, technical, and institutional, were analyzed. A total of 315 Indonesian citizens participated as respondents in this research survey. The Partial Least Squares - Structural Equation Model (PLS–SEM) method was utilized as the analytical approach for the study. The results revealed that nine factors significantly influenced program sustainability, with the strongest impacts from technology costs (path coefficient = 0.859), contextual factors (0.803), electrical infrastructure (0.792), and community perception (0.773). Economic sustainability was driven by technology costs and business opportunities (0.643), while environmental sustainability was strongly influenced by electrical infrastructure. Post-installation support (0.307) and financial management (0.391) significantly impacted technical and institutional sustainability respectively. These empirical findings improve previous research on the sustainability of an energy transition program, which provides insights for researchers and stakeholders in the energy management field, especially in developing countries, for policy determination and decision-making.

Article Details

How to Cite
Damayanti, R. W., Silvia Dhea Safira, Pringgo Widyo Laksono, Haryono Setiadi, & Nisa Aqilla Ellenahaya Entifar. (2025). Drivers of the Sustainability Performance of Induction Stove Conversion Program in Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 43, 5–30. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.8414
Issue
Vol. 43 (2024)
Section
Articles

Articles published in International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management are following the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivs (by-nc-nd). Further information about Creative Commons

Authors can archive post-print (final draft post-refereering) on personal websites or institutional repositories under these conditions:

  • Publishers version cannot be stored elsewhere but on publishers homepage
  • Published source must be acknowledged
  • Must link to publisher version

 

 

References

UNESCAP. Energy Transition Pathways for the 2030 Agenda - SDG 7 Roadmap for Indonesia. New York: United Nation; 2020. https://www.unescap.org/resources/energy-transition-pathways-2030-agenda-sdg7-roadmap-indonesia (accessed April 3, 2024).

Babayomi OO, Dahoro DA, Zhang Z. Affordable clean energy transition in developing countries: Pathways and technologies, iScience (2022) p 104-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104178.

International Energy Agency (IEA). An Energy Sector Roadmap to Net Zero Emissions in Indonesia. Indonesia: IEA Publicatons; 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/an-energy-sector-roadmap-to-net-zero-emissions-in-indonesia (accessed March 15, 2024).

WHO Team. Indoor Air Quality Guidelines: Household Fuel Combustion. Geneva: World Health Organization;2014. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241548885 (accessed August 10, 2024).

Thoday K, Benjamin P, Gan M, Puzzolo E. The Mega Conversion Program from kerosene to LPG in Indonesia: Lessons learned and recommendations for future clean cooking energy expansion, Energy Sustain Dev (2018) p 71-81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.011.

IESR. Indonesia Energy Transition Outlook 2023: Tracking Progress of Energy Transition in Indonesia: Pursuing Energy Security in the Time of Transition. Jakarta: Institute for Essential Services Reform (IESR); 2022. https://iesr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Indonesia-Energy-Transition-Outlook-2023.pdf (accessed April 9, 2024).

Zhou Y, Huang X, Peng S, L. Li. Comparative study on the combustion characteristics of an atmospheric induction stove in the plateau and plain regions of China. Appl. Therm. Eng. 111 (2017) p 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.095.

Rizky DL, Damayanti RW, Laksono P W. Induction Stove Implementation for Sustainable Clean Energy Consumption: A Literature Study, Renewable Energy Systems and Sources. ICRCE 2023. Kolhe ML. Ed. Singapore: Springer (2023) p 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6290-7_8.

Pie OC. The Gas vs Induction stove debate. Japan: Japan Simple Life; 2023. https://japansimplelife.com/viewtopic.php?t=831 (accessed August 9, 2024).

Kim HJ, Lim SY, Yoo SH. Are Korean households willing to pay a premium for induction cooktops over gas stoves?. Sustain. 9 (2017) p 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091546.

Daouda M, Carforo A, Miller H, Ventrella J, Tan YA, Feliciano M, Tryner J, Hallward-Driemeier A, Chillrud S, Commane R, Hernández D, Johnson M, Jack D. Out of Gas, In with Justice: Findings from a gas-to-induction pilot in low-income housing in NYC, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 116 (2024) p 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103662.

EnergyAustralia. Is an induction cooktop right for you?. Australia; 2020. https://www.energyaustralia.com.au/blog/better-energy/induction-cooktop-right-you (accessed August 9, 2024).

Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP). The State of Access to Modern Energy Cooking Services. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2020.

Damayanti RW, Setiadi H, Laksono PW, Rizky DL, Entifar NAE. Factors Affecting Technological Readiness and Acceptance of Induction Stoves : A Pilot Project. Emerg. Sci. J. 7 (2024) p 1892–1923. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-06-04.

Banerjee M, Prasad R, Rehman IH, Gill B. Induction stoves as an option for clean cooking in rural India. Energy Policy 88 (2016) p 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.021.

Pratiwi CD, R. Damayanti RW, Laksono PW. Public Sentiment Analysis to Support Indonesian Government Induction Stove Program. E3S Web Conf. 465 (2023) p. 02006. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346502006.

Purwanti A. The Long Road to Converting LPG to Induction Stove. Jakarta: Kompas; 2022 p 17. https://www.kompas.id/baca/riset/2022/09/20/ (accessed December 2, 2024).

Kshirsagar VS, Pawar PM, Mehetre ST, Holistic approach for biogas technology implementation to improve sustainability. Curr. Sci. 116 (2019) p 249–255. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v116/i2/249-255.

Ben-Eli MU. Sustainability: definition and five core principles, a systems perspective. Sustain. Sci. 13 (2018) p 1337–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0564-3.

Ruggerio CA. Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Sci. Total Environ. 786 (2021) p 147481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481.

Poudel B, Parton K, Morrison M. The drivers of the sustainable performance of renewable energy-based mini-grids. Renew. Energy 189 (2022) p 1206–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.006.

Glavič P. Updated Principles of Sustainable Engineering. Processes. 10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10050870.

Paudel J, Sharifi A, Khan GD. What are the drivers of sustainable energy transition? Insights from an empirical analysis of household preferences for electric induction cooking in Nepal. J. Clean. Prod. 417 (2023) p 138021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138021.

Yudiartono Y, Windarta J, Adiarso A. Sustainable Long-Term Energy Supply and Demand: The Gradual Transition to a New and Renewable Energy System in Indonesia by 2050. Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev. 12 (2023) p 419–429. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2023.50361.

Moraskar A, Daigavane PM. Analysis &Design of Technical Feasibility of Electric Cooking for Scalable India, in 10th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology - Signal and Information Processing (ICETET-SIP-22) (2022) p 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETET-SIP-2254415.2022.9791496.

Martínez-Gómez J, Ibarra D, Villacis S, Cuji P, Cruz PR. Analysis of LPG, electric and induction cookers during cooking typical Ecuadorian dishes into the national efficient cooking program, Food Policy 59 (2016) p 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.12.010.

Ochoa Avilés JP, E Silva VVR, Tofoli FL. Household induction cooking system based on a grid-connected photovoltaic system. IET Circuits. Devices Syst. 14 (2020) p 1117–1128. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cds.2019.0305.

Ahmad W, Hassan M, Masud SFB, Amjad MS, Samara F, Zeshan, Anwar M, Rafique MZ, Nawaz T. Socio-economic benefits and policy implications of generating sustainable energy from municipal solid waste in Pakistan. Energy Clim. Chang. 5 (2024) p. 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100124.

Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. Europe Business Review 2014;26:106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.

Abudayyeh D, Almomani M, Almomani O, Jaber D, Alhelo E. Examining the Determinants of Electric Vehicle Acceptance in Jordan: A PLS-SEM Approach. World Electr. Veh. J. 14 (2023) p 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj14110304.

Sundarakani B, Rajamani HS, Madmoune A. Sustainability study of electric vehicles performance in the UAE: moderated by blockchain. Benchmarking 31 (2024) p 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2021-0624

Duc ML, Viet QNK. Analysis Affect Factors of Smart Meter A PLS-SEM Neural Network. Int. Res. J. Adv. 4 (2022) p 288–301. https://doi.org/10.47392/irjash.2022.071.

ISO/TR 19867-3:2018(E). Clean cookstoves and clean cooking solutions — Harmonized laboratory test protocols — Part 3: Voluntary performance targets for cookstoves based on laboratory testing vol. 2018. Geneva: ISO; 2018.

Astuti SP, Day R, Emery SB, A successful fuel transition? Regulatory instruments, markets, and social acceptance in the adoption of modern LPG cooking devices in Indonesia. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 58 (2019) p 101248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101248.

Hakam DF, Nugraha H, Wicaksono A, Rahadi RA, Kanugrahan SP. Mega conversion from LPG to induction stove to achieve Indonesia’s clean energy transition. Energy Strateg. Rev. 41 (2022) p 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100856.

Al Irsyad MI, Anggono T, Anditya C, Ruslan I, Cendrawati DG, Nepal R. Assessing the feasibility of a migration policy from LPG cookers to induction cookers to reduce LPG subsidies. Energy for Sustainable Development 70 (2022) p 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2022.08.003.

Menghwani V, Zerriffi H, Dwivedi P, Marshall JD, Grieshop A, Bailis R. Determinants of Cookstoves and Fuel Choice Among Rural Households in India 16 (2019) p 21–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-018-1389-3.

T Tawiah T, Iddrisu S, Gyaase S, Twumasi M, Asante KP, Jack D. The feasibility and acceptability of clean fuel use among rural households. A pilot study in Central Ghana. J. Public Health Africa 13 (2022) p 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2022.2205.

Osiolo HH. Cook stove technology adoption: Evidence from Kenya. Energy Sustain. Dev. 63 (2021) p 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2021.06.004.

Ganewo Z, Kare S, Mulugeta M, Alemu A, Mathewos M. Determinants of improved cookstove adoption and its benefits Ethiopia. World J. Innov. Res. 3 (2023) p 2454–8236. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3526232/v1.

Damayanti RW, Setiadi H, Kurnianto DK, Entifar NAE. Configuration Analysis of Technology Readiness, Technology Acceptance, and Public Satisfaction Regarding Continued Induction Stove Use in Indonesia. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 14 (2) p 428–438. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.14.2.19010.

Tama A. Deployment of Electric Induction Technologies into Cooktops Plates as a Part of Energy Sustainability. Smart Grid Renew. Energy 13 (2022) p 55–74. https://doi.org/10.4236/sgre.2022.133004.

Gould CF, Schlesinger SB, Molina E, Bejarano ML, Valarezo A, Jack DW. Household fuel mixes in peri-urban and rural Ecuador: Explaining the context of LPG, patterns of continued firewood use, and the challenges of induction cooking. Energy Policy 136 (2020) p 111053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111053.

Hilmiyati-Mas’adah H, Sudiro A, Rohman F, Yuniarinto A, Hakam DF, Nugraha H. Assessing the Impact of Urban Lifestyle and Consumption Values on Conversion Intention: A Study towards Energy Sustainability. Sustain. 15 (2023) p 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086549.

Wanamaker C. The Environmental, Economic, and Social Components of Sustainability. Soapboxie; 2022. https://soapboxie.com/social-issues/The-Environmental-Economic-and-Social-Components-of-Sustainability (accessed July 9, 2024).

Broska LH. It’s all about community: On the interplay of social capital, social needs, and environmental concern in sustainable community action. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 79 (2021) p 102165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102165.

Goldemberg J, Martinez-Gomez J, Sagar A, Smith KR. Household air pollution, health, and climate change: Cleaning the air. Environ. Res. Lett. 13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa49d.

Vidhi R, Shrivastava P, Parikh A. Social and Technological Impact of Businesses Surrounding Electric Vehicles. Clean Technol. 3 (2021) p 81–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol3010006.

Apenko SN, Fomina IA. Analysis of the maturity of sustainable project management in Russian enterprises in the transition to the digital economy. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. - Humanit. Soc. Sci. 12 (2019) p 530–544. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0407.

Digalwar AK, Thomas RG, Rastogi A. Evaluation of Factors for Sustainable Manufacturing of Electric Vehicles in India. Procedia CIRP 8 (2021) p 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.142.

Z Tarigan ZJH. The influence of social media marketing on customer loyalty through perceived usefulness of streaming technology, perceived enjoyment, and brand loyalty. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 8 (2024) p 1001–1016. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.12.007.

Spampatti T, Hahnel UJJ, Trutnevyte E, Brosch T. Short and long-term dominance of negative information in shaping public energy perceptions: The case of shallow geothermal systems. Energy Policy 167 (2022) p 113070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113070.

Xiao J, Goulias KG. Perceived usefulness and intentions to adopt autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy Practice. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 161 (2022) p 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.05.007.

Irwin NB. Sunny days: Spatial spillovers in photovoltaic system adoptions. Energy Policy 151 (2021) p 112192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112192.

Sanguino R, Barroso A, Fernández-Rodríguez S, Sánchez-Hernández MI. Current trends in economy, sustainable development, and energy: a circular economy view. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27 (2020) p 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07074-x.

Arianpoo N, Islam ME, Wright AS, Niet T. Electrification policy impacts on land system in British Columbia, Canada. Renew. Sustain. Energy Transit. 5 (2024) p 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2024.100080.

Abdallah SM, Bressers H, Clancy JS. Energy reforms in the developing world: Sustainable development compromised?. Int. J. Sustain. Energy Plan. Manag. 5 (2015) p 41–56. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2015.5.5.

Market Research Report 2019-2022. Induction Stove Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis. Fortune Business Insight; 2023. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/induction-stove-market-104494 (accessed December 20, 2023).

Verghese S. Induction Cookstop Market. Future Market Insight; 2023. https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/induction-cooktops-market (accessed December 20, 2023).

Foulds C, Khalid R, Jensen EA, Sule O, Lorenz L. Social responsibility in research and innovation practice and policy across global regions, institutional types, and fields: Interview data and qualitative content analysis outputs revealing the perspectives and experiences of professionals. Open Res. Eur. 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15688.1.

Ali K, Kausar N, Amir M. Impact of pollution prevention strategies on environment sustainability: role of environmental management accounting and environmental proactivity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30 (2023) p 88891–88904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28724-1.

Din AU, Ming J, Rahman IU, Han H, Yoo S, Alhrahsheh RR. Green road transportation management and environmental sustainability: The impact of population density. Heliyon 9 (2023) p 19771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19771.

J Martínez J, Martí-Herrero J, Villacís S, Riofrio AJ, VacaD. Analysis of energy, CO2 emissions and economy of the technological migration for clean cooking in Ecuador. Energy Policy 107 (2017) p 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.033.

Zhao F, Bai F, Liu X, Liu Z. A Review on Renewable Energy Transition under China’s Carbon Neutrality Target. Sustain. 14 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215006.

Popkova EG, Sergi BS. Energy infrastructure: Investment, sustainability and AI. Resour. Policy 91 (2024) p 104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104807.

T Kativhu T, Mazvimavi D, Tevera D, Nhapi I. Implementation of Community Based Management (CBM) in Zimbabwe: The dichotomy of theory and practice and its influence on sustainability of rural water supply systems. Phys. Chem. Earth 106 (2018) p 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2018.05.003.

Dauenhauer PM, Frame D, Eales A, Strachan S, Galloway S, Buckland H. Sustainability evaluation of community-based, solar photovoltaic projects in Malawi. Energy. Sustain. Soc. 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-0241-0.

Ferdoush MR, Al Aziz R, Karmaker CL, Debnath B, Limon MH, Bari ABMM. Unraveling the challenges of waste-to-energy transition in emerging economies: Implications for sustainability. Innov. Green Dev. 3 (2024) p 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100121.

Mukhtar N. Conceptual Model of Technical Sustainability for Integration into Electrical/Electronic Engineering Programmes in Nigerian Polytechnics. IEEE Access. 8 (2020) p 128519–128535. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002579.

Mukhtar N, Bin Kamin Y, Saud MSB. Quantitative validation of a proposed technical sustainability competency model: A PLS-SEM approach. Front. Sustain. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.841643.

Moreira-Santos D, Au-Yong-Oliveira M, Palma-Moreira A. Fintech Services and the Drivers of Their Implementation in Small and Medium Enterprises. Inf. 13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090409.

Wong S, Yeung JKW, Yip Lau Y, So J. Technical sustainability of cloud-based blockchain integrated with machine learning for supply chain management. Sustain. 13 (2021) p 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158270.

Morse S, McNamara N. This Is Where We Have Scored’: Exploring the Interface between Project and Institutional Sustainability Facilitated by a Faith-Based Development Organisation in Sierra Leone. Sustain. 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097292.

Hondroyiannis G, Sardianou E, Nikou V, Evangelinos K, Nikolaou I. Energy market dynamics and institutional sustainability: How affect the Europe’s circular economy. Circular Economy. Circ. Econ. 2 (2023) p 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2023.100048.

Kayaga S, Mugabi J, Kingdom W. Evaluating the institutional sustainability of an urban water utility: A conceptual framework and research directions. Util. Policy 27 (2013) p 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2013.08.001.

Nicli S. Socio-economic, political, and institutional sustainability of agroforestry in alta verapaz, guatemala. J. Agric. Rural Dev. Trop. Subtrop. 120 (2019) p 105–117. https://doi.org/10.17170/kobra-20190613561.

Purvis B, Mao Y, Robinson D. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustain. Sci. 14 (2019) p 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5.

Schöggl JP, Rusch M, Stumpf L, Baumgartner RJ. Implementation of digital technologies for a circular economy and sustainability management in the manufacturing sector. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 35 (2023) p 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.012.

Chen X, Kurdve M, Johansson B, Despeisse M. Enabling the twin transitions: Digital technologies support environmental sustainability through lean principles. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 38 (2023) p 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.03.020.

Nagariya R, Kumar D, Kumar I. Sustainable service supply chain management: from a systematic literature review to a conceptual framework for performance evaluation of service only supply chain. Benchmarking 29 (2022) p 1332–1361. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2021-0040.

Katre A, Tozzi A. Assessing the sustainability of decentralized renewable energy systems: A comprehensive framework with analytical methods. Sustain. 10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041058.

Andrade C. The Limitations of Online Surveys. Indian J. Psychol. Med. 42 (2020) p 575–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620957496.

Jain P, Rekha. Impact of Demographic Factors : Technology Adoption in Agriculture. In SCMS Journal of Indian Management. September (2017) pp. 93–102. https://www.scms.edu.in/uploads/journal/July-September%202017.pdf (accessed January 10, 2024).

Central Statistics Agency of Indonesia. Indonesian Population Data; 2023. https://www.bps.go.id/en. (accessed August 10, 2024).

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39 (2007) p 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.

Hair JF, Hult GT, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2017. http://lccn.loc.gov/2016005380.

Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31 (2019) p 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.

Puji LGK, Adianto J, Gabe RT. Gender Performance in the Kitchen of Indonesian Middle-Class. Int. J. Built Environ. Sci. Res. 7 (2023) p 61. https://doi.org/10.24853/ijbesr.7.1.61-74.

Djono, Sukmawati F, Salimi M. Indonesian Culinary History and Values: Exploration Study in Solo City, Indonesia. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 18 (2023) p 961–969. http://dx.doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180332.

David W, Widianingsih NN, Ardiansyah.Cooking behaviour of different ethnic groups residing in and around lowland rainforests of Sumatra, Indonesia. Int. J. Agric. Resour. Gov. Ecol. 13 (2017) p 162–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJARGE.2017.086444.

Hair J, Hollingsworth CL, Randolph AB, Chong AYL. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 117 (2017) p 442–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130.

Demir A, Ergün E. Justice Fosters the Effect of Team-Building Interventions on Viability and Performance. Sustain. 15 (2023) p 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su151512023.

Balassa BE, Nagy NG, Gyurián N. Perception and social acceptance of 5G technology for sustainability development. J. Clean. Prod. 467 (2024). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142964.

Wang K, Ke Y. Social sustainability of communities: A systematic literature review. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 47 (2024) pp. 585–597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.04.031.

Zhao X, Toronjo H, Shaw CC, Murphy A, Taxman FS. Perceived communication effectiveness in implementation strategies: a measurement scale. Implement. Sci. Commun. 3 (2022) p 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00284-4.

Bajracharya Y, Adhikari P, Sharma BP. Factors Determining the Adoption of Induction Stove for Household Cooking in Bhaktapur. J. Sci. Eng. 10 (2023) p 31–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jsce.v10i1.61015.

Mendoza JMF, Gallego-Schmid A, Velenturf APM, Jensen PD, Ibarra D. Circular economy business models and technology management strategies in the wind industry: Sustainability potential, industrial challenges and opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 163 (2022) p. 112523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112523.

Rydehell H, Löfsten H, Isaksson A. Novelty-oriented value propositions for new technology-based firms: Impact of business networks and growth orientation. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 29 (2018) p 161–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2018.09.001.

Shaheen F, Lodhi MS, Rosak-Szyrocka J, Zaman K, Awan U, Asif M, Ahmed W, Siddique M. Cleaner Technology and Natural Resource Management: An Environmental Sustainability Perspective from China. Clean Technol. 4 (2022) p 584–606. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol4030036.

Mikulčić H, Baleta J, Klemeš JJ. Cleaner technologies for sustainable development. Clean. Eng. Technol. 7 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100445.

Gaglioppa B, Tabone F. Human behaviours: New paradigms of energy efficiency. Communication tools to deliver a technical message to non-experts. E3S Web Conf. 343 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202234305001.

Akter S, Mary N, Edward M. The impact of an improvement in the quality and reliability of rural residential electricity supply on clean cooking fuel adoption : Evidence from six energy poor Indian states. World Dev. 172 (2023) p 106366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106366.

Selçuklu SB, Rodgers MD, Movlyanov A. Economically and environmentally sustainable long-term power system expansion. Comput. Ind. Eng. 164 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107892.

Černák I, Rojček M, Jenčo M. Analysis of Sustainability of IT Team Development in an Organization. TEM J. 12 (2023) p 43–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.18421/TEM121-06.

Pearce JM. Ensuring technical competency for management of research-focused organizations. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 29 (2018) p 172–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2018.09.002.

Olawumi T O, Chan DWM. Key drivers for smart and sustainable practices in the built environment. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 27 (2020) p 1257–1281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-06-2019-0305.

Gill N, Osman P, Head L, Voyer M, Harada T, Waitt G, Gibson C. Looking beyond installation: Why households struggle to make the most of solar hot water systems. Energy Policy 87 (2015) p 83–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.038.

Pavanelli JMM, Sang EV, Oliveira CE, Campos FE, Lazaro LLB, Edomah, N, Igari, AT. An institutional framework for energy transitions: Lessons from the Nigerian electricity industry history. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 97 (2023). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.102994.

Blohm M. An enabling framework to support the sustainable energy transition at the national level. Sustain. 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073834.

Hossain MR, Rao A, Sharma GD, Dev D, Kharbanda A. Empowering energy transition: Green innovation, digital finance, and the path to sustainable prosperity through green finance initiatives. Energy Econ. 136 (2024) p 107736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107736.

Shah RV. Financial incentives for promotion of electric vehicles in India - An analysis using the environmental policy framework. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 21 (2022) p 1227-1234. https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2022.v21i03.028.

Xu T, Liu D, Mo L. Policy design of government subsidy for end-of-life solar panel recycling. Appl Math Model 129 (2024) p 390-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2024.01.047.

Colmenares-Quintero RF, Benavides-Castillo JM, Rojas N, Stansfield KE. Community perceptions, beliefs and acceptability of renewable energies projects: A systematic mapping study. Cogent Psychol 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1715534.

Tribbe J, Zuin V, Delaire C, Khush R, Peletz R. How do rural communities sustain sanitation gains? Qualitative comparative analyses of community-led approaches in Cambodia and Ghana. Sustain. 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105440.

Arora, P, Rehman, IH, Suresh R, Sharma A, Sharma, D, & Sharma An. Assessing the role of advanced cooking technologies to mitigate household air pollution in rural areas of Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India. Environmental Technology and Innovation 20 (2020) p 101084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101084

Manesh MHK, Onishi VC. Energy, exergy, and thermo-economic analysis of renewable energy-driven polygeneration systems for sustainable desalination. Processes 9 (2021) p 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020210.

Jayashree S, Reza MNH, Malarvizhi CAN, Mohiuddin M. Industry 4.0 implementation and Triple Bottom Line sustainability: An empirical study on small and medium manufacturing firms. Heliyon 7 (2021) p e07753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07753.

Damayanti RW, Hartono B, Wijaya AR. Project Managers’ Perspectives on the Complexity of Construction Megaproject in Indonesia: A Multicase Study. IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. 49 (2021) p 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2021.3063812.

Boadu S, Otoo E. A comprehensive review on wind energy in Africa: Challenges, benefits and recommendations. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 191 (2024) p 114035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114035.

Khosravani F , Abbasi E, Choobchian S, Ghazizade MJ. A comprehensive study on criteria of sustainable urban waste management system: using content analysis. Sci. Rep. 13 (2023) p 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49187-x.

Noverita R, Mussry DJS. Proposed PT PLN (Persero) marketing capability to realize induction stove as a preferable option for LPG substitution and electrifying lifestyle growth. In: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Business Management and Research (ICBMR). 160 (2020) p 36–44. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.201222.006.

Razmjoo AA, Sumper A.Investigating energy sustainability indicators for developing countries. Int. J. Sustain. Energy Plan. Manag. 21 (2019) p 59–76. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2019.21.5.

Damayanti RW, Setiadi H, Laksono PW, Rizky DL. Indonesia Induction Stoves Conversion Program: Technology Adoption and Behavior. In 17th Global Congress on Manufacturing and Management (2023). https://doi.org/p 1-19. 10.18517/ijaseit.14.2.19010.

Huang MS, Liao CC, Li ZF, Shih ZR, Hsueh HW. Quantitative Design and Implementation of an Induction Cooker for a Copper Pan. IEEE Access 9 (2021) p 5105–5118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3046713.

Al Hasibi RA. Multi-objective Analysis of Sustainable Generation Expansion Planning based on Renewable Energy Potential: A case study of Bali Province of Indonesia. Int J of Sust Energy Plan and Mgt 31 (2021) p 189–210. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.6474.

Østergaard PA. Editorial - International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol 28. Int J of Sust Energy Plan and Mgt 28 (2020) p 1–2. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.5737.

Østergaard PA, Johannsen M. Energy Transition in the Global South – Editorial for the International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol 35. Int J of Sust Energy Plan and Mgt 35 (2022) p 1–4. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.7393.

Tumiran S, Putranto LM, Priyanto A, Savitri I. Generation expansion planning for high-potential hydropower resources: The case of the Sulawesi electricity system. Int J of Sust Energy Plan and Mgt 28 (2020) p 37–52. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.3247.

Damayanti R. W., E. Pujiyanto, Z. H. Rahman, D. L. Rizky, and N. A. E. Entifar, Utilising Failure Mode And Effect Analysis and The Kano Model for Induction Stove Performance Improvement During Indonesia’s Energy Conversion Program. J Eng Manag Inf Technol 2 (3) (2024) p 119–128. https://doi.org/10.61552/jemit.2024.03.003.

Nguyen M, Malik A, Sharma P, Kingshott R, Gugnani R. High involvement work system and organizational and employee resilience: Impact of digitalisation in crisis situations. Technol Forecast Soc Change 205 (2024) p 123510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123510.