Crowdfunding of Climate Mitigation Measures in Agriculture: Developing a Sustainable Business Model Concept
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/jbm.v12i2.8843Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to develop a sustainable business model (SBM) concept for local crowdfunding of climate measures in agriculture. Many climate measures entail significant capital costs preventing farmers from their adoption, and existing finance schemes have experienced limited success. Crowdfunding can be a novel financing tool for farmers to implement climate measures in agriculture.
Design/Methodology/Approach: We apply the adapted SBM canvas framework and argue that the framework presents a suitable tool for identifying and validating business models for a local crowdfunding program.
Findings: By applying the adapted SBM canvas tool and through an extensive mixed method approach, the study identifies 6 relevant design principles for SBM development and relates them to different dimensions in the SBM canvas.
Practical Implications: The study develops a proven business model concept that can be implemented by practitioners and farmers to facilitate the adoption of climate change mitigation measures, overall contributing to the transition to a low emission society.
Originality/Value: This study demonstrates the existing limitations of the adapted SBM canvas and suggests how it can be improved by integrating external structural constraints that can be a barrier to business model development. Moreover, we contribute to the SBM literature by being the first to connect Design Science with crowdfunding and the adapted SBM canvas.
References
Ahlers, G. K., Cumming, D., Günther, C. and Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 39, No.4, pp. 955-980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
Banerjee, A., Banerji, B., Berry, J., Duflo, E., Kannan, H., Mukerji, S., Shotland, M., Walton, M. (2017). From Proof of Concept to Scalable Policies: Challenges and Solutions, with an Application. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 73-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.4.73
Barnes. A.P., Toma, L. (2012). A typology of dairy farmer perceptions towards climate change. Climatic Change, Vol. 112, pp. 507–522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0226-2
Baumgart-Getz, A., Prokopy, L.S., Floress, K. (2012). Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 96, No.1, pp. 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.006
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., and Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 585-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003
Belz, F. M., Binder, J. K. (2017). Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Convergent Process Model. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1887
Bocken, N.M.P., C.S.C. Schuit, C. Kraaijenhagen, (2018). Experimenting with a circular business model: Lessons from eight cases, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 28, pp. 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.02.001
Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., Evans, S., (2014). A literature and practice review to develop Sustainable Business Model Archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 65, pp. 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., Evans, S., (2013). A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling. Corporate Governance. Vol. 13, No. 5, 482–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2013-0078
Burton, R. Farstad, M. (2020). Cultural lock-in and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions: the case of dairy/beef farmers in Norway. Sociologia Ruralis, No. 60, pp. 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12277
Böckel, A., Hörisch, J., Tenner, I. (2021). A systematic literature review of crowdfunding and sustainability: Highlighting what really matters. Management Review Quarterly, Vol. 71, pp. 433–453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00189-3
Calic, Goran, and Elaine Mosakowski. (2016). Kicking Off Social Entrepreneurship: How a Sustainability Orientation Influences Crowdfunding Success. Journal of Management Studies Vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 738–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12201
Caputo, A., Schiocchet, E., Triose, C. (2022). Sustainable business models as successful drivers in equity crowdfunding. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 31, No. 7, pp. 3509-3522. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3102
Ching, H,Y. Fauvel, C. (2013). Criticisms, variations and experiences with business model canvas, European Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 26 -37.
Ciulli, F., Kolk, A., Bidmon, C.M., Sprong, N., Hekkert, M.P. (2022). Sustainable business model innovation and scaling through collaboration. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Vol. 45, pp. 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.11.003
Coes, B. (2014). Critically assessing the strengths and limitations of the business model canvas, Master thesis Business Administration, University of Twente, available at: https://essay.utwente.nl/64749/1/Coes_MA_MB.pdf
Conte, M.N., Kotchen, M, J., (2010). Explaining the price of voluntary carbon offsets. Climate Change Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 93–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S2010007810000091
Cooper, M. H. Boston, J., Bright J. (2013). Policy challenges for livestock emissions abatement: lessons from New Zealand, Climate Policy, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 110-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2012.699786
Cumming, D. J., Leboeuf, G, Schwienbacher A., (2017). Crowdfunding cleantech, Energy Economics, Vol. 65, pp. 292-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.030
Danda, K.K., Hartmann, L.P. (2011). The Ethics of Carbon Neutrality: A Critical Examination of Voluntary Carbon Offset Providers. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 100, pp. 119–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0766-4
Davidson, D.J., Rollins, C., Lefsrud, L., Anders, S., Hamann, A. (2019). Just don’t call it climate change: climate-skeptic farmer adoption of climate-mitigative practices. Environmental. Research Letters, Vol.14 034015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aafa30
Dumbrell, N.P., Kragt, M.E., Meier, Biggs, J. S., Thorburn, P., J. (2017). Greenhouse gas abatement costs are heterogeneous between Australian grain farms. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 37, No. 28, pp.1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0438-6
Dumbrell, N.P., Kragt, M.E., Gibson, F.L. (2016). What carbon farming activities are farmers likely to adopt? A best–worst scaling survey, Land Use Policy, Vol. 54, pp. 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.002
FAO, (2020). Emissions due to agriculture. Global, regional and country trends 2000–2018. FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series No 18. Rome.
Farstad, M., Hårstad R.M.B. (2022). Crowdfunding of GHG mitigation measures in agriculture: A feasible contribution to global climate challenges? Socio-cultural constraints and enablers in Norway. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, Vol. 122, No. 2, pp. 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2022.2152972
Geissdoerfer M, Bocken NM, Hultink, EJ. (2016). Design thinking to enhance the sustainable business modelling process–a workshop based on a value mapping process. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 135, pp. 1218–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.020
Goni, F.A., Gholamzadeh Chofreh, A., Estaki Orakani, Z. Klemeš, J.J., Davoudi, M., Mardani, A. (2021). Sustainable business model: A review and framework development. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, Vol. 23, pp. 889–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01886-z
Gössling, S., Haglund, L., Kallgren, H., Revahl, M., Hultman, J. (2009). Swedish air travellers and voluntary carbon offsets: towards the co-creation of environmental value? Current Issues in Tourism, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500802220687
Hansen, S., Bakke Haavik, T.; Bergslid, I.K., Elvatun, H.; van Gool, B.; Lunnan, T.; Røthe, G.; Walland, F. (2018). Miljø-og klimavennlig melkeproduksjon Inspirasjon fra seks melkeproduksjonsbruk, NIBIO Rapport 4:16.
Haring, G., M. (2019). Mapping of the Business Model Experimentation Process for Coolcrowd, Ruralis Report 8/2019, Trondheim. https://ruralis.no/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/r-8_19-mapping-of-the-business-model-experimentation-process-for-coolcrowd-g-m--haring.pdf
Hohle, E. E., Bardalen, A., Haugen J.M., Kvalevåg M., Øygarden, L., Hanssen-Bauer, I., Walland F., Brunvatne, J.O. (2016). Landbruk og klimaendringer. Report from Working Group, 19 February. Oslo: Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/416c222bde624f938710ff36751ef4d6/rapport-landbruk-og-klimaendringer---rapport-fra-arbeidsgruppe-190216.pdf
IATA, (2022). “Enabling Voluntary Carbon Offsetting.” Available at: https://www.iata.org/en/programs/environment/carbon-offset/#:~:text=What%20is%20carbon%20offsetting%3F,investing%20in%20carbon%20reduction%20projects. (Accessed 01.08.2022).
Joyce, A., Paquin, R.L., (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 135,1474-1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067
Kragt, M., E. Burton, R, Zahl-Thanem, A., Otte, P., P. (2021). Farmers’ interest in crowdfunding to finance climate change mitigation practices, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 321, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128967
Kendig, C.E. (2016). What is Proof of Concept Research and how does it Generate Epistemic and Ethical Categories for Future Scientific Practice? Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 22, pp. 735–753. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9654-0
Kragt, M.E., Burton, R., Zahl-Thanem, A., Otte, P.P. (2021). Farmers’ interest in crowdfunding to finance climate change mitigation practices, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 321, 128967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128967
Kreft C., Huber, R., Wuepper, D., Finger, R. (2021). The role of non-cognitive skills in farmers' adoption of climate change mitigation measures, Ecological Economics, Vol. 189,107169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107169
Lam, P. T. and Law, A. O. (2016). Crowdfunding for renewable and sustainable energy projects: An exploratory case study approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 60, pp. 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.046
Lehner, O. M. (2013). Crowdfunding social ventures: A model and research agenda. Venture Capital, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 289-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2013.782624
Lokuge, N., Anders, S. (2022). Carbon-credit systems in agriculture: A review of literature. The School of Public Policy Publications, Vol. 15, No. 12, pp. 1-43., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4096174
Maehle, Natalia, Otte, P. P., Drozdova, N. (2020). “Crowdfunding Sustainability.” Shneor, R., Zhao, L., and Flåten, B-T. (eds). Advances in Crowdfunding Research and Practice. Palgrave MacMillan, p.393-422.
Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Natalicchio, A., Panniello, U., Roma, P. (2019). Understanding the crowdfunding phenomenon and its implications for sustainability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 141, pp. 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.002
Miljødirektoratet, (2021). Klimagassutslipp fra jordbruk. https://miljostatus.miljodirektoratet.no/tema/klima/norske-utslipp-av-klimagasser/klimagassutslipp-fra-jordbruk/ (accessed 01.08.2022).
Miljødirektoratet, (2020). «Klimakur 2030 – Tiltak og virkemidler mot 2030» available at: https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/m1625/m1625.pdf#page=46 (accessed 01.08.2022).
Moerkerken, A., Blasch, J., van Beukering, P. van Well. E. (2020). A new approach to explain farmers’ adoption of climate change mitigation measures. Climatic Change, Vol. 159, pp. 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02595-3
Ortas, E., Burritt, R.L. and Moneva, J.M. (2013). Socially responsible investment and cleaner production in the Asia Pacific: Does it pay to be good? Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 52, pp. 272-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.024
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley and Sons Hoboken, New Jersey.
Otte, P.P., Zahl-Thanem, A., Hansen, S., Maehle, N. (2019). Norwegian farmers’ willingness to participate in a local climate crowdfunding program – results from a national survey. Ruralis report (R-5/19), Trondheim. https://ruralis.no/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/rapport-5_19-norwegian-farmers-willingness-to-participate-in-a-local-climate-crowdfunding-program-results-from-a-national-survey--p-otte-a--zahl-thanem-s--hansen-and-n--mhle-31-05.pdf
Regjeringen, (2019). «Enighet om klimaavtale mellom regjeringen og jordbruket».available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/enighet-om-klimaavtale-mellom-regjeringen-og-jordbruket/id2661309 / (21.06.2019), (accessed 01.08.2022).
Ruggiero, S., Kangas, H.-L., Annala, S., Lazarevic, D., (2021). Business model innovation in demand response firms: Beyond the niche-regime dichotomy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 39, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.02.002
Shneor, R. (2020). “Crowdfunding in Norway: Status Report 2019 Q1-Q4”. Oslo: Norwegian Crowdfunding Association. Available at: https://www.crowdfunding-research.org/norwegian-market-statistics (accessed 18.05.2020).
Shneor, R., Zhao, L., Flåten, B.-T. (2020). Introduction: From Fundamentals to Advances in Crowdfunding Research and Practice. In R. Shneor, L. Zhao and B.-T. Flåten (Eds.) Advances in Crowdfunding: Research and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, 1-18.
Shneor, R., Maehle, N. (2020). Advancing crowdfunding research: New insights and future research agenda. Baltic Journal of Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-04-2020-420
Statista Research Department, n.d. Market size of crowdfunding worldwide, available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1078273/global-crowdfunding-market-size/ (accessed 25.02.2023).
Shneor, R., Vik, A.A. (2020). Crowdfunding success: a systematic literature review 2010–2017. Balt. J. Manag., 15(2), 149-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-04-2019-0148
Stoknes, P.E.; Soldal, O.B.; Hansen, S.; Kvande, I.; Skjelderup, S.W. (2021). Willingness to Pay for Crowdfunding Local Agricultural Climate Solutions. Sustainability, Vol. 13, 9227. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169227
Stoknes, P. E. (2014). Rethinking climate communications and the psychological climate paradox. Energy Research and Social Science Vol. 1, pp. 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.007
Testa, S., Nielsen, K. R., Bogers, M. Cincotti, S. (2019). The role of crowdfunding in moving towards a sustainable society. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 141, pp. 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.011
UNFCC, (2022). “The Paris Agreement”, available at: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement, (accessed 27.07.2022).
Van Burg, E., Jager de, S., Reymen, I., Cloodt, M. (2012). Design principles for corporate venture transition processes in established technology firms. R&D Management, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 455-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00695.x
Verschuuren, J. (2018). Towards an EU Regulatory Framework for Climate-Smart Agriculture: The Example of Soil Carbon Sequestration. Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 301-322. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000395
Wreford, A., Ignaciuk, A., Gruère, G. (2017). Overcoming barriers to the adoption of climate-friendly practices in agriculture, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 101, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Ziegler, T., Shneor, R., Wenzlaff, K., Wang, W.B., et al., (2020). The Global Alternative Finance Market Benchmarking Report, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. Available at: https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020-04-22-ccaf-global-alternative-finance-market-benchmarking-report.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles published in Journal of Business Models follow the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivs (by-nc-nd). Further information about Creative Commons
