Keywords
Higher Education
Epistemics
Resistance
Conflict
Undergraduate
CA
Conversation Analysis
How to Cite
Abstract
Supervision in higher education (HE) often balances the tension between fostering student autonomy and providing sufficient guidance, especially within undergraduate programs. This paper explores an under-researched area: the dynamics of group supervision in undergraduate education, specifically how students challenge their supervisor's expertise. Using video recordings of a group of engineering students at Aalborg University working within a Problem-Based Learning (PBL) framework, the study investigates moments of disagreement between students and their supervisor during project supervision. Employing conversation analysis (CA), the study examines the negotiation of epistemic claims — where students draw on their experience to challenge the supervisor’s expertise — and the subsequent impact on the learning trajectories. The findings highlight that students use their epistemic authority from experience to challenge their supervisor’s proposed academic direction, while the supervisor defends their stance based on disciplinary knowledge. The study emphasizes the importance of aligning cognitive congruence and situated learning to facilitate productive supervision interactions. Ultimately, the paper sheds light on the critical yet often overlooked role of student agency in supervision and offers insights into improving the supervisory process in HE, particularly in group settings.
References
Acker, S., Hill, T., & Black, E. (1994). Thesis Supervision in the Social Sciences: Managed or Negotiated? Higher Education, 28, 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383939
Antaki, C., Biazzi, M., Nissen, A., & Wagner, J. (2008). Accounting for moral judgments in academic talk: The case of a conversation analysis data session. Text & Talk, 28(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.001
Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional Interaction Studies of Talk at Work. Ashgate.
Askehave, I., Prehn, H. L., Pedersen, J., & Pedersen, M. T. (Eds.). (2015). PBL - Problem-Based Learning. Aalborg University. https://www.aau.dk/digitalAssets/148/148025_pbl-aalborg-model_uk.pdf
Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. H. (2002). Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: Shifting dynamics and identities. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 429–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040040201
Bridges, S. M., & Imafuku, R. (Eds.). (2020). Interactional Research Into Problem-Based Learning. Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvs1g9g4
Clayman, S. E. (2013). Turn-Constructional Units and the Transition-Relevant Place. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 150–167). Wiley Blackwell.
de Saint-Georges, I., & Filliettaz, L. (2008). Situated trajectories of learning in vocational training interactions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172746
Del Río, M. L., Díaz-Vázquez, R., & Maside Sanfiz, J. M. (2018). Satisfaction with the supervision of undergraduate dissertations. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417721365
Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J. L., Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452884
Donaghue, H. (2020). ‘Time to construct positive identities’: Display questions in post observation teacher feedback. Classroom Discourse, 11(3), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1581626
Engin, M. (2015). Trainer talk in post-observation feedback sessions: An exploration of scaffolding. Classroom Discourse, 6(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2014.919867
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ETHNOMETHODOLOGY. Prentice-Hall.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
Goodwin, C. (2004). Practices of Seeing Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach. In The Handbook of Visual Analysis (pp. 2–30). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020062
Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-Operative Action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139016735
Gurr, G. M. (2001). Negotiating the “Rackety Bridge”—A Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Stud. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/07924360120043882
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in Qualitative Research Analyisng Social Interaction in Everyday Life. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435385
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2013). Embodied Action and Organizational Activity. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch14
Hendry, G., Wiggins, S., & Anderson, T. (2016). Are You Still with Us? Managing Mobile Phone Use and Group Interaction in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1600
Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B. (2013). The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 57–76). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch4
Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
Heritage, J. (2013). Epistemics in Conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 370–395). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch18
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and Strategies of a Problem-based Learning Facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1004
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Bridges, S. M., & McKeown, J. M. (2019). Facilitating Problem-Based Learning. In M. Moallem, W. Hung, & N. Dabbagh (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Problem-Based Learning (pp. 297–321). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173243.ch13
Illeris, K. (1974). Problemorientering og deltagerstyring. Unge Pædagoger.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Kitzinger, C. (2013). Repair. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 229–257). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences makes knowledge. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039681
Kolmos, A., Fink, F. K., & Krogh, L. (Eds.). (2004). The Aalborg PBL model—Progress, diversity and challenges. Aalborg University Press.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2014). Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472593764
Leyland, C. (2018). Resistance as a resource for achieving consensus: Adjusting advice following competency-based resistance in L2 writing tutorials at a British University. Classroom Discourse, 9(3), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1480966
McIlvenny, P. (2020). The future of ‘video’ in video-based qualitative research is not ‘dumb’ flat pixels! Exploring volumetric performance capture and immersive performative replay. Qualitative Research, 20(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120905460
McQuade, R., Ventura-Medina, E., Wiggins, S., & Anderson, T. (2019). Examining self-managed problem-based learning interactions in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1649366
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and the Society. University of Chicago Press.
Moallem, M., Hung, W., & Dabbagh, N. (Eds.). (2019). The Wiley Handbook of Problem-Based Learning. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173243
Mondada, L. (2007). Commentary: Transcript variations and the indexicality of transcribing practices. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 809–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607082581
Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. (1995). Lectures on conversation: Volumes I & II. Blackwell.
Savin-Baden, M., & Wilkie, K. (Eds.). (2004). Challenging research in problem-based learning. Open Univ. Press.
Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (2000). Factors Affecting Small-Group Tutorial Learning: A Review of Research. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Problem-Based Learning A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions (pp. 19–53). Routledge.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis—Discourse and the emerging internet. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203694343
Scollon, S. W., & de Saint-Georges, I. (2012). Mediated discourse analysis. In M. Handford & J. P. Gee (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 66–78).
Servant, V. F. C. (2016). Revolutions and re-iterations: An intellectual history of problem-based learning. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J. (2013). Introduction. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 1–9). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch1
Stokoe, E. H. (2000). Constructing Topicality in University Students’ Small-group Discussion: A Conversation Analytic Approach. Language and Education, 14(3), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780008666789
Todd, M., Bannister, P., & Clegg, S. (2004). Independent inquiry and the undergraduate dissertation: Perceptions and experiences of final‐year social science students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000188285
Velmurugan, G. (2022). Problem Construction in Problem-Based Learning How Students Deal with Disagreements in Decision-Making. Aalborg University.
Velmurugan, G., Stentoft, D., & Davidsen, J. (2021). Disagreeing about the Problem in PBL: How students negotiate disagreements regarding the Problem in PBL. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v9i1.6241
West, M. (2020). ‘I’m Not Going to Tell You Cos You Need to Think About This’: A Conversation Analysis Study of Managing Advice Resistance and Supporting Autonomy in Undergraduate Supervision. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00194-5
West, M. (2023). Advice Resistance in Undergraduate Supervision Meetings: The Competing Relevance of Expertise and Experience. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 42(5–6), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X231185750
Yew, E. H. J., & Yong, J. J. Y. (2014). Student perceptions of facilitators’ social congruence, use of expertise and cognitive congruence in problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 42(5), 795–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9306-1
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Giajenthiran Velmurugan, Jacob Gorm Davidsen