Keywords
Curriculum design
Curriculum development
Integrated curricula
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper will present the argument that while Problem Based Learning (PBL) (or its variant Project Based Learning, PjBL) provides significant benefits and advantages to student learning in of itself, the full benefit of PBL is only completely realised as part of an “integrated” curriculum that provides a variety of learning opportunities and instructional support. We propose that PBL should be more widely considered and used as the key integrative feature within a curriculum to enable programmes to connect theory, practice, societal context, values and skills as well as to break the mentality that comes with modularisation. To do this, we suggest that a coherent thread of PBL should be enacted that is stratified to progress students through increasingly open problems and projects, each connected to other aspects of the taught curriculum while enabling skills development and the formation of professional and responsible attitudes and attributes. We provide some examples from our own experience in Engineering but advocate that this approach is much more widely applicable within higher education.
References
Anderson, R. D., (2004). Germany and the Humboldtian Model. In European Universities from the Enlightenment to 1914. Oxford.
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New directions for teaching and learning, 1996(68), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966804
Barnett, Ronald (2011). Being a University. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842485
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. Revised ed. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Blackmore, P., & Kandiko, C.B. (2012). Strategic Curriculum Change in Universities: Global Trends, (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203111628
Bruner, J.S. (1960). The Process of Education. Cambridge, M A: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028999
Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2021). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: a review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 90-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615
Christie, M., & De Graaff, E. (2017). The philosophical and pedagogical underpinnings of Active Learning in Engineering Education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1254160
Coyle, E., Allebach, J., & Krueger, J. (2006). The vertically integrated projects (VIP) program in ECE at Purdue: fully integrating undergraduate education and graduate research. In 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 11-1336).
Crawley, E. F., & Hosoi, A. E. (2019). Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) program at MIT - Building community, developing projects, and connecting with industry. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33124
Davis, M. (1998). Making a case for design-based learning. Arts Education Policy Review, 100(2), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632919809599450
Dole, S., Bloom, L., & Doss, K. K. (2017). Engaged learning: Impact of PBL and PjBL with elementary and middle grade students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), 9.
https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1685
Engineering Council. (2020). The Accreditation of Higher Education Programmes (AHEP) Fourth Edition. Engineering Council.
Fung, D. (2017). Connected Curriculum for Higher Education. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1qnw8nf
Gallagher, S.E. & Savage, T. (2023). Challenge-based learning in higher education: an exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 1135-1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863354
GMC. (2018). Outcomes for Graduates. General Medical Council, UK.
Goldberg, D.E., & Somerville, M. (2014). A Whole New Engineer: The Coming Revolution in Engineering Education. Douglas, MI: Threejoy Associates, Incorporated.
Goldberg, D.E., & Somerville, M., (2023). A Field Manual for a Whole New Education: Rebooting Higher Education for Human Connection and Insight in a Digital World. Douglas, MI: Threejoy Associates, Incorporated.
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International journal of educational research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Habbal, F., Kolmos, A., Hadgraft, R.G., Egelund Holgaard J., & Reda, K. (2024). Reshaping Engineering Education: Addressing Complex Human Challenges. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5873-3
Harden, R. M., & Stamper, N. (1999). What is a spiral curriculum? Medical Teacher, 21(2), 141-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599979752
Hrynchak, P., & Batty, H. (2012). The educational theory basis of team-based learning. Medical Teacher, 34(10), 796-801. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.687120
Kolmos, A., De Graaff, E., & Du, X. (2009). Diversity of PBL – PBL Learning Principles and Models. In Research on PBL practice in engineering education (pp. 9-21). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909321_003
Kolmos, A. (2017). PBL Curriculum Strategies. In A. Guerra, R. Ulseth, & A. Kolmos (Eds.), PBL in Engineering Education – International Perspectives on Curriculum Change (pp 1–12). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-905-8_1
Lahiff, A., Tilley, E., Broad, J., Roach, K., & Detmer, A. (2019). Disciplinary learning in project-based undergraduate engineering education: The case for new knowledge. In: Kloot, B., (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2019 Research in Engineering Education Symposium (REES 2019) (pp. 578-587). REEN (Research in Engineering Education Network): Cape Town, South Africa.
Marginson, S. (2016). Higher Education and the Common Good. (1st ed.). Melbourne University Publishing: Melbourne, Australia.
Mitchell, J. E., Nyamapfene, A., Roach, K., & Tilley, E. (2021). Faculty wide curriculum reform: the integrated engineering programme. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 48-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1593324
Newman, J. H. (1996). The idea of a university. M. M. Garland, S. Castro-Klaren, G. P. Landow, G. M. Marsden, & F. Turner (Eds.). Yale University Press.
Premalatha, K. (2019). Course and Program Outcomes Assessment Methods in Outcome-Based Education: A Review. Journal of Education, 199(3), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057419854351
Roach, K., Tilley, E., & Mitchell, J. (2018). How authentic does authentic learning have to be? Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 495-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1462099
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its Constructivist Framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. In Walker, A., Leary, H., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Ertmer, P. A. (Eds.), Essential Readings in Problem-Based Learning: Exploring and Extending the Legacy of Howard S. Barrows (pp. 5-16). Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq6fh.6
Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education: Untold Stories. SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham.
Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2004). Foundations of Problem-Based Learning (p. 198). New York: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Smith, K.L. (2012). Lessons learnt from literature on the diffusion of innovative learning and teaching practices in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(2), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.677599
Short, E.C. (2002). Knowledge and the Educative Functions of a University: Designing the Curriculum of Higher Education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270110069181
Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
SRA. (2014). Academic Stage Handbook, Solicitors Regulation Authority, UK.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 John Mitchell, Emanuela Tilley