Hybridity, Transparency, Structured Freedom and Flipped Engagement
An Example of Networked Learning Pedagogy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/nlc.v12.8675Keywords:
Hybridity, Transparency, Structured freedom, Flipped engagement, Epistemic practiceAbstract
In this paper, we contribute to current discussions of what constitutes the field of networked learning as a research domain and what makes networked learning particularly relevant and distinct within the broader landscape of digital technology in higher education. We enter this dialogue through discussing and reflecting on a hybrid learning design for a 10-ECTS module that builds on a Networked Learning Pedagogy. The purpose of our discussions is to elicit tensions and contradictions that surface when students are confronted with a networked learning pedagogy. We discuss the module in relation to ideas of networked learning pedagogy, present four pedagogical principles underpinning the module, and we draw out interesting tensions and contradictions that have emerged. Following this, we use the discussions to feed into the ongoing dialogue of ‘what is networked learning’, and we discuss how networked learning can contribute to practice and policy in higher education through developing practice.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Ryberg, Lykke Brogaard Bertel, Mia Thyrre Sørensen, Jacob Davidsen, Ulla Konnerup
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-ND
This license enables reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC-ND includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
ND: No derivatives or adaptations of the work are permitted.