Students' digital learning environments

Authors

  • Francesco Caviglia Centre for Teaching Development and Digital Media, Aarhus University
  • Christian Dalsgaard Centre for Teaching Development and Digital Media, Aarhus University
  • Jacob Davidsen E-learning Lab, Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University
  • Thomas Ryberg E-learning Lab, Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54337/nlc.v11.8751

Keywords:

Personal learning environments, LMS, Virtual learning environments, Digital learning environments, Educational technology

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to examine the nature of students’ digital learning environments to understand the interplay of institutional systems and tools that are managed by the students themselves. The paper is based on a study of 128 students’ digital learning environments. The objectives of the study are 1) to provide an overview of tools for students’ study activities, 2) to identify the most used and most important tools for students and 3) to discover which activities the tools are used for. The empirical study reveals that the students have a varied use of digital media. Some of the most used tools in the students’ digital learning environments are Facebook, Google Drive, tools for taking notes, and institutional systems. Additionally, the study shows that the tools meet some very basic demands of the students in relation to collaboration, communication, and feedback. Finally, the study shows that most of the important tools are not related to the systems provided by the educational institutions. Based on the study, the paper concludes with a discussion of how institutional systems connect to the other tools in the students’ practices, and how we can qualify students’ digital learning environments in relation to existing and emerging needs.

Downloads

Published

14-05-2018

How to Cite

Caviglia, F., Dalsgaard, C., Davidsen, J., & Ryberg, T. (2018). Students’ digital learning environments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning , 11, 165–172. https://doi.org/10.54337/nlc.v11.8751